Part of
Language Contact and Change in the Americas: Studies in honor of Marianne Mithun
Edited by Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Diane M. Hintz and Carmen Jany
[Studies in Language Companion Series 173] 2016
► pp. 273296
References (43)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The Languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala (Comunidad Lingüística Jakalteka). 2001a. Stzotib’al Popti’. Vocabulario Jakalteko (Popti’). Ciudad de Guatemala.Google Scholar
. 2001b. Ak’b’oj payat tzoti’ yul ab’xub’al popti’. Actualización lexical idioma maya jakalteko (Popti’). Ciudad de Guatemala.Google Scholar
Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala (Méndez Cruz, A.F.) 2001c. Stxolb’anil Ab’xub’al Popti’. Gramática descriptiva jakalteka Popti’. Ciudad de Guatemala.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent. 1968. Tzeltal Numeral Classifiers: A Study in Ethnographic Semantics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1999. Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: Counting and beyond. In Numeral Types and Changes Worldwide, Jadranka Gvozdanovic (ed.), 113-185. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitborde, Lawrence B. 1973. Selection and Setting in Jacaltec Noun Classifier Usage. Paper presented at the summer meetings of the Linguistic Society of America. Ann Arbor MI.
Craig, Colette. 1977. Jacaltec Syntax: A Study of Complex Sentences. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. Jacaltec: Fieldwork in Guatemala. In Languages and Their Speakers, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 3-57. Cambridge MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
. 1986. Jacaltec noun classifiers: A study in language and culture. In Noun Classes and Categorization [Typological Studies in Language 7], Colette G. Craig (ed.), 263-295, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Jacaltec noun classifiers: A study in grammaticalization, Lingua 70(4): 241‑284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Los clasificadores de nombre en Jacalteco: una innovación kanjobalana. In Lecturas sobre la lingüística maya, Nora C. England & Stephen R. Elliot (eds), 221-252. Antigua, Guatemala: CIRMA.Google Scholar
. 1992. Classifiers in a functional perspective. In Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective: Papers from the Functional Grammar Conference, Copenhagen, 1990, Michael Fortescue, Peter Harder & Lars Kristoffersen (eds), 277-303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Day, Christopher. 1973. The semantics of social categories in a transformational grammar of Jacaltec. In Meaning in Mayan Languages, Munro S. Edmonson (ed.), 85-105. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
de León, Lourdes. 1988. Noun and Numeral Classifiers in Mixtec and Tzotzil: A Referential View. PhD dissertation, University of Sussex.
Delgado Rojas, Edna Patricia, Silvestre Sanchez, José Aurelio, Silvestre Diaz, María Elizabeth & Ross Montejo, Antonio Benicio. 2007. Stz’ib’nheb’anil ab’xub’al popti’. Gramática normativa Popti’. Guatemala City: Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 2010. Investigating Variation: The Effects of Social Organization and Social Setting [Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
England, Nora C. 1992a. Introducción a la lingüística: Idiomas mayas. Guatemala: PLFM, Editorial Cholsamaj.Google Scholar
. 1992b. Endangered languages: Doing Mayan linguistics in Guatemala. Language 68(1): 29-35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldwasser, Orly & Grinevald, Colette. 2012. What are determinatives good for? In Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian [Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica 9], Eitan Grossman, Stéphane Polis & Jean Winand (eds), 17-53. Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morpho-syntactic typology of classifiers. In Systems of Nominal Classification, Gunter Senft (ed.), 50-92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Linguistique et langues mayas du Guatemala. [Faits de Langues 20]. Meso-Amérique, Caraïbes, Amazonie Volume 1: 17-27. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
. 2006. Encounters at the brink: Linguistic fieldwork among speakers of endangered languages. In The Vanishing Languages of the Pacific Rim, Chapter 3, Osahito Miyaoka, Osamu Sakiyama, & Michael E. Krauss (eds), 35-76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. The (Jakaltek) Popti’ noun classifier system: From its origins to recent developments. The Diachrony of Classification Systems COST Workshop (Action A31), Paper given in Wassenaar, 12-14 March.
. 2010a. Quarante ans de perspective sur deux langues en danger: Le jakaltek popti’ du Guatemala et le rama du Nicaragua. In Linguistique de terrain sur langues en danger: Locuteurs et linguistes [Faits de Langues 35-36], Colette Grinevald & Michel Bert (eds), 39-78. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
. 2010b. Linguistique de terrain sur LED: Locuteurs et méthodes. In Linguistique de terrain sur langues en danger: Locuteurs et linguistes [Faits de Langues 35-36], Colette Grinevald & Michel Bert (eds), 133-177. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
. 2015. Classifiers, Linguistics of. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn., Vol. 3, James Wright (ed.), 811-818. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Nicholas Arthur. 1967. The Chuj Language. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
. 2012. The noun classifiers of the Cuchumatanes: A case of diffusion from Otomanguean. International Journal of American Linguistics 78(3): 411-427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence S. 1974. Idiomas de Mesoamérica [Seminario de Integración Social Guatemalteca 33]. Guatemala City: Editorial José de Pineda Ibarra y Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
La Farge, Oliver & Byers, Douglas. 1931. The Year Bearer’s People [Middle American Research Institute Series 3]. New Orleans LA: Tulane University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1996. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Laura Ellen. 1977. Positional Roots in Kanjobal. PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
Méndez Cruz, Atonio Feliciano. 1997. Diccionario Popti’ (Jakalteko)-CASTELLANO Morfosemántico. Hej stzoti’al jab’xub’al. Ciudad de Guatemala: Nawal Wuj, NORAD.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1990. Language obsolescence and linguistic description. International Journal of American Linguistics 56: 1-26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Who shapes the record: The speaker and the linguist. In Linguistic Fieldwork, Paul Newman & Martha Ratcliff (eds), 34-54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Grammars and the community. Studies in Language 30(2): 281-306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montejo, Ruperto & De Nicholas, Pedro. 1996. Gramática del idioma q’anjob’al. Antigua, Guatemala: Proyecto Lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar
Mora-Marín David F. 2002. Full phonetic complementation, semantic classifiers, and semantic determinatives in ancient Maya hieroglyphic writing. Ancient Mesoamerica 19(2): 195-213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehg, Kenneth L. 1981. Ponapean Reference Grammar [PALI Language Texts: Micronesia]. Honolulu HI: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank & Payne, Doris. 2007. Nominal classification in the North West Amazon: Issues in areal diffusion and typological characterization. International Journal of American Linguistics 73(4): 381-387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zavala Maldonado, Roberto. 1989. Los clasificadores nominales del kanjobal de San Miguel Acatán: Esbozo gramatical y tipología de sistemas clasificatorios. Tesis de licenciatura. Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia. México, D.F.
. 2000. Multiple classifier systems in Akatek (Mayan). In Systems of Nominal Classification, Gunter Senft (ed.), 114-146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chacon, Thiago Costa
2022. Gender and Noun Class Markers in Kubeo (Tukanoan). Faits de Langues 52:2  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.