Cover not available
Part of
Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 57–84

Vertical scales in temporal sub constructions in Latin

| Case Western University

Latin authors of the classical period used sub rarely and purposefully in a temporal construction like a polarity item with the dichotomous nouns nox and lux to convey the relative quantity of atmospheric light at dusk and dawn, implying a scale at its minimum value within an absolute frame of reference. This construction comes out of the spatial semantics of sub as “under” through a manipulation of metaphor, directional mappings from vertical to horizontal axes, and up/down and center/periphery image schemas. Beginning with the embodied experience of the sky as “above”, projections onto topological features such as mountains allows for negative and inceptive uses of sub for pragmatic scalar construal and implicature.

Keywords: conceptual blending, construction grammar, frame semantics, image schemas, landmark/trajectory, polarity, primary metaphor, scalar implicature
Published online: 11 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.03kni
References
Bennett, Charles
1907 The Latin Language. A Historical Outline of its Sounds, Inflections, and Syntax. Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio
1991 Anthropology and Roman Culture. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry
2001 Case. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Samuel
1823 Praxis on the Latin Prepositions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coleman, Robert
1990 Latin prepositional syntax in Indo-European perspective. In New Studies in Latin Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 21], Robert Coleman (ed.), 323-38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coren, Stanley, Ward, Lawrence & Enns, James
2003 Sensation and Perception. Hoboken NJ: Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve
2012 Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodge, Ellen & Lakoff, George
2005 Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In Beate Hampe & Joseph Grady (eds), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, 57-92. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, James
1998 The History & Practice of Ancient Astronomy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark
2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1975 Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6(3): 353-75.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1982 Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111-137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph
2005 Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10): 1595-1614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael
2004 The pragmatics of polarity. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Lawrence Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 701-723. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2011 The Grammar of Polarity: Pragmatics, Sensitivity, and the Logic of Scales. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2008 Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Chris & Pinkster, Harm
1983 Latin preverbs and cases. In Latin Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Harm Pinkster (ed.),145-166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1985 The relationship between prepositions and cases within Latin prepositional phrases. In Subordination and Other Topics in Latin, Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), 253-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Núñez, Rafael & Sweetser, Eve
2006 With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30: 401–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platner, Samuel
1929 A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg
2011 The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine Time, History, and the Fasti. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Frank
2008 C.R. Cockerell and the discovery of entasis in the columns of the Parthenon. In The Persistence of the Classical: Essays on Architecture Presented to David Watkin, Frank Salmon (ed.), 106-123. London: Philip Wilson.Google Scholar
Schlicher, John
1936 The development of Caesar’s narrative style. Classical Philology 31(3): 212-224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, William
2013 Latin De: A view from cognitive semantics. Classical Antiquity 32(2): 378-405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sihler, Andrew
1995 New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stevens, Gorham
1924 Entasis of Roman columns. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 4: 121-152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
2006 ‘The suburbs of your good pleasure’: Cognition, culture and the bases of metaphoric structure. In The Shakespearean International Yearbook, Graham Bradshaw (ed.), 24-55. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Thompson, Peter, Papadopoulou, Georgia & Vassiliou, Eleni
2007 The origins of entasis: illusion, aesthetics or engineering. Spatial Vision 20(6): 531-543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
2011 The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
de Vaan, Michiel
2008 Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ellison, Tim
2023. Historical rhapsody: Citation and pseudo‐citation in Herder's Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte zur Bildung der Menschheit. The German Quarterly 96:4 ► pp. 482 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.