Cover not available
Part of
Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 57–84

Vertical scales in temporal sub constructions in Latin

| Case Western University
Latin authors of the classical period used sub rarely and purposefully in a temporal construction like a polarity item with the dichotomous nouns nox and lux to convey the relative quantity of atmospheric light at dusk and dawn, implying a scale at its minimum value within an absolute frame of reference. This construction comes out of the spatial semantics of sub as “under” through a manipulation of metaphor, directional mappings from vertical to horizontal axes, and up/down and center/periphery image schemas. Beginning with the embodied experience of the sky as “above”, projections onto topological features such as mountains allows for negative and inceptive uses of sub for pragmatic scalar construal and implicature.
Keywords: conceptual blending, construction grammar, frame semantics, image schemas, landmark/trajectory, polarity, primary metaphor, scalar implicature
Published online: 11 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.03kni
References (33)
References
Bennett, Charles. 1907. The Latin Language. A Historical Outline of its Sounds, Inflections, and Syntax. Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio. 1991. Anthropology and Roman Culture. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry. 2001. Case. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Samuel. 1823. Praxis on the Latin Prepositions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coleman, Robert. 1990. Latin prepositional syntax in Indo-European perspective. In New Studies in Latin Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 21], Robert Coleman (ed.), 323-38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coren, Stanley, Ward, Lawrence & Enns, James. 2003. Sensation and Perception. Hoboken NJ: Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve. 2012. Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodge, Ellen & Lakoff, George 2005. Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In Beate Hampe & Joseph Grady (eds), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, 57-92. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, James. 1998. The History & Practice of Ancient Astronomy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6(3): 353-75.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111-137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph. 2005. Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10): 1595-1614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael. 2004. The pragmatics of polarity. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Lawrence Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 701-723. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2011. The Grammar of Polarity: Pragmatics, Sensitivity, and the Logic of Scales. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Chris & Pinkster, Harm. 1983. Latin preverbs and cases. In Latin Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Harm Pinkster (ed.),145-166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 1985. The relationship between prepositions and cases within Latin prepositional phrases. In Subordination and Other Topics in Latin, Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), 253-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Núñez, Rafael & Sweetser, Eve. 2006. With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30: 401–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platner, Samuel. 1929. A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg. 2011. The Roman Calendar from Numa to Constantine Time, History, and the Fasti. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Frank. 2008. C.R. Cockerell and the discovery of entasis in the columns of the Parthenon. In The Persistence of the Classical: Essays on Architecture Presented to David Watkin, Frank Salmon (ed.), 106-123. London: Philip Wilson.Google Scholar
Schlicher, John. 1936. The development of Caesar’s narrative style. Classical Philology 31(3): 212-224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, William. 2013. Latin De: A view from cognitive semantics. Classical Antiquity 32(2): 378-405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sihler, Andrew. 1995. New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stevens, Gorham. 1924. Entasis of Roman columns. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 4: 121-152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 2006. ‘The suburbs of your good pleasure’: Cognition, culture and the bases of metaphoric structure. In The Shakespearean International Yearbook, Graham Bradshaw (ed.), 24-55. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Thompson, Peter, Papadopoulou, Georgia & Vassiliou, Eleni. 2007. The origins of entasis: illusion, aesthetics or engineering. Spatial Vision 20(6): 531-543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 2011. The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
de Vaan, Michiel. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ellison, Tim
2023. Historical rhapsody: Citation and pseudo‐citation in Herder's Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte zur Bildung der Menschheit. The German Quarterly 96:4 ► pp. 482 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.