Ontological and orientational metaphors arise from general cognitive processes and rely on our embodied experience of the physico-spatial world, providing us with image schemas that we commonly exploit in order to interpret and express abstract notions in terms of spatial configurations. This is particularly true in the case of emotions and feelings, which are much less clearly defined than our bodily functions. Indeed, recurrent embodied patterns building bridges between spatial orientations and feelings occur in a great variety of languages. It has long been noted, for instance, that the vertical axis up vs. down offers the basis for portraying many experiential metaphors in terms of ‘happy/positive is up’, ‘sad/negative is down’. This paper shows that both ontological and orientational metaphorization is largely attested in this domain of experience in Latin, and provides corpus-based evidence for frequency and productivity effects and cross-linguistic comparisons that testify how the human body is a universal cognitive key to interpret and categorize emotions in modern as well as in ancient languages.
2003Experiencer Constructions in Wolof. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg, Institut für Afrikanistik und Äthopistik.
Bickel, Balthasar
2004The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Non Nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Buarque de Holanda Ferreira, Aurélio
1975Novo dicionário da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.
Cairns, Douglas
1993Aidôs: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: OUP.
Cairns, Douglas
2012Vêtu d’impudeur et enveloppé de chagrin. Le rôle des métaphores de “l’habillement” dans les concepts d’émotion en Grèce ancienne. In Les vêtements antiques: s’habiller, se déshabiller dans les mondes anciens, Florence Gherchanoc & Valérie Huet (eds), 175–88. Paris: Errance.
Casasanto, Daniel
2013Experiential origins of mental metaphors: Language, culture, and the body. In The Power of Metaphor: Examining Its Influence on Social Life, Mark Landau, Michael Robinson & Brian Meier (eds), 249–268. Washington DC: American Psychological Association Books.
Casasanto, Daniel & Dijkstra, Katinka
2010Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition 115(1): 179–185.
Clausner Timothy & Croft, William
1997Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science 21: 247–282.
Clausner Timothy & Croft, William
1999Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10(1): 1–31.
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
Deignan, Alice
2005Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dewell, Robert
2005Dynamic patterns of containmnt. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph Grady (ed.), 369–394. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Ernout, Alfred & Meillet, Antoine
1959Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue latine. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.
2011Experiential metaphors in Latin: Feelings were containers, movements and things possessed. Transactions of the Philological Society 109(3): 307–326.
Fedriani, Chiara
2014Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill.
Fedriani, Chiara, Manzelli, Gianguido & Ramat, Paolo
2000Las ‘metáforas de la vida cotidiana’ en latín y su proyección etimológica en castellano. In Cien años de investigación semántica, de Michel Breal a la actualidad: Actas del Congreso Internacional de Semántica, Vol. 2, José Manuel Oliver Frade (ed.), 1571–1584. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.
García Jurado, Francisco & López Gregoris, Rosario
1995Las ‘metáforas de la vida cotidiana’ en el lenguaje plautino como procedimiento de caracterización de los personajes. SIFC 13: 233–245.
Gibbs, Raymond
2005Emobodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: CUP.
Gibbs, Raymond & Colston, Herbert
1995The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6: 347–78.
Hampe, Beate
2005Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph Grady (eds), 1–12. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Heine, Bernd
1997Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Johnson, Mark
1987The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, Mark & Rohrer, Tim
2007We are live creatures: Embodiment, American pragmatism, and the cognitive organism. In Body, Language, and Mind, Vol. 1, Jordan Zlatev, Tom Ziemke, Roz Frank & René Dirven (eds), 17–54. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kavaleto-Petrova, Margarita, Todorov, Simeon, Bertoli-Simeonova, Marija & Tonkin, Ivan
1992Bălgarsko-italianski rečnik. Sofija: Nauka i izkustvo.
2006The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Kovalev, Vladimir
1995Russo, Russkij. Dizionario russo italiano, italiano russo. Bologna: Zanichelli.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2000Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture and Body in Human Body. Cambridge: CUP.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2002Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1985Possessive constructions in Oceanic languages and Proto-Oceanic. In Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress, Andrew Pawley & Lois Carrington (eds), 93–140. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Series C.
1991The meanings of the genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics 2(2): 149–205.
Padel, Ruth
1992In and Out of the Mind: Greek Images of the Tragic Self. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Prandi, Michele
2012A plea for Living Metaphors: Conflictual Metaphors and Metaphorical Swarms. Metaphor and Symbol 27(2): 148–170.
Redhouse, James
1994[2003]Redhouse büyük elsözlüğü. İngilizce-Türkçe. Türkçe-İngilizce. The Larger Redhouse Portable Dictionary. English-Turkish, Turkish-English, On Sekizinci Baskı. İstanbul: SEV Matbaalacılık ve Yayıncılık Eğitim.
Sinha, Chris & De López, Kristine Jensen
2000Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1-2): 17–41.
Short, William
2012Latin De: A view from cognitive semantics. Classical Antiquity 32(2): 378–405.
Stafford, Emma & Herrin, Judith
(eds)2005Personification in the Greek World: From Antiquity to Byzantium. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2006Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan T. Gries (eds), 1–16. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Stolz, Thomas, Kettler, Sonja, Stroh, Cornelia & Urdze, Aina
(eds)1991Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Wheeler, Max, Yates, Alan & Dols, Nicolau
1999Catalan. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1992Semantics, Culture and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford: OUP.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1999Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.
Yonge, Charles
1877Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. New York NY: Harper.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Berno, Francesca Romana
2023. Roman Luxuria,
Buccheri, Alessandro, Irene De Felice, Chiara Fedriani & William M. Short
2021. Semantic analysis and frequency effects of conceptual metaphors of emotions in Latin. From a corpus-based approach to a dictionary of Latin metaphors. Journal of Latin Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Jiménez Martínez, María Isabel
2020. El movimiento como metáfora. Colocaciones con los verbos de movimiento venio e incido en latín. Nova Tellus 38:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Tur, Cristina
2022. Metonimias y metáforas conceptuales con manus en el teatro latino. Emerita 90:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.