Part of
Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 115140
References (56)
References
Ameka, Felix. 1990. The grammatical packaging of experiencers in Ewe: A study in the semantics of syntax. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10: 139–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babiniotis, George Demetrius. 2002. Lexikó tēs Néas Ellēnikḗs Glṓssas (Dictionary of the Modern Greek language). Athens: Centre of Lexicology.Google Scholar
Bakos, Ferenc. 1991. Román-magyar kéziszótár (Romanian-Hungarian dictionary). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Becher, Jutta. 2003. Experiencer Constructions in Wolof. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg, Institut für Afrikanistik und Äthopistik.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2004. The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Non Nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buarque de Holanda Ferreira, Aurélio. 1975. Novo dicionário da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
Cairns, Douglas. 1993. Aidôs: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. Vêtu d’impudeur et enveloppé de chagrin. Le rôle des métaphores de “l’habillement” dans les concepts d’émotion en Grèce ancienne. In Les vêtements antiques: s’habiller, se déshabiller dans les mondes anciens, Florence Gherchanoc & Valérie Huet (eds), 175–88. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel. 2013. Experiential origins of mental metaphors: Language, culture, and the body. In The Power of Metaphor: Examining Its Influence on Social Life, Mark Landau, Michael Robinson & Brian Meier (eds), 249–268. Washington DC: American Psychological Association Books.Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel & Dijkstra, Katinka. 2010. Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition 115(1): 179–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clausner Timothy & Croft, William. 1997. Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science 21: 247–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10(1): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewell, Robert. 2005. Dynamic patterns of containmnt. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph Grady (ed.), 369–394. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Meillet, Antoine. 1959. Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue latine. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2004. Experiencer objects in Iwaidjan languages (Australia). In Non nominative subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 169–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara. 2011. Experiential metaphors in Latin: Feelings were containers, movements and things possessed. Transactions of the Philological Society 109(3): 307–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara, Manzelli, Gianguido & Ramat, Paolo. 2013. Gradualness in contact-induced grammatical replication: The case of the abstract possession construction in the Circum-Mediterranean area. In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 391–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Jurado, Francisco. 2000. Las ‘metáforas de la vida cotidiana’ en latín y su proyección etimológica en castellano. In Cien años de investigación semántica, de Michel Breal a la actualidad: Actas del Congreso Internacional de Semántica, Vol. 2, José Manuel Oliver Frade (ed.), 1571–1584. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar
García Jurado, Francisco & López Gregoris, Rosario. 1995. Las ‘metáforas de la vida cotidiana’ en el lenguaje plautino como procedimiento de caracterización de los personajes. SIFC 13: 233–245.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 2005. Emobodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond & Colston, Herbert. 1995. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6: 347–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, Beate. 2005. Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph Grady (eds), 1–12. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark & Rohrer, Tim. 2007. We are live creatures: Embodiment, American pragmatism, and the cognitive organism. In Body, Language, and Mind, Vol. 1, Jordan Zlatev, Tom Ziemke, Roz Frank & René Dirven (eds), 17–54. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kavaleto-Petrova, Margarita, Todorov, Simeon, Bertoli-Simeonova, Marija & Tonkin, Ivan. 1992. Bălgarsko-italianski rečnik. Sofija: Nauka i izkustvo.Google Scholar
Koltay-Kastner, Jenő. 1963. Magyar-olasz szótár (Hungarian-Italian dictionary). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Konstan, David. 2006. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kovalev, Vladimir. 1995. Russo, Russkij. Dizionario russo italiano, italiano russo. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture and Body in Human Body. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1985. Possessive constructions in Oceanic languages and Proto-Oceanic. In Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress, Andrew Pawley & Lois Carrington (eds), 93–140. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Series C.Google Scholar
Leka, Ferdinand & Simoni, Zef. 1996. Dizionario albanese-italiano. Fjalor shqip-italisht, Tiranë: Çabej / Besa.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2003. On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. A Study of the Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki. 1991. The meanings of the genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics 2(2): 149–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padel, Ruth. 1992. In and Out of the Mind: Greek Images of the Tragic Self. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Prandi, Michele. 2012. A plea for Living Metaphors: Conflictual Metaphors and Metaphorical Swarms. Metaphor and Symbol 27(2): 148–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redhouse, James. 1994[2003]. Redhouse büyük elsözlüğü. İngilizce-Türkçe. Türkçe-İngilizce. The Larger Redhouse Portable Dictionary. English-Turkish, Turkish-English, On Sekizinci Baskı. İstanbul: SEV Matbaalacılık ve Yayıncılık Eğitim.Google Scholar
Sinha, Chris & De López, Kristine Jensen. 2000. Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1-2): 17–41.Google Scholar
Short, William. 2012. Latin De: A view from cognitive semantics. Classical Antiquity 32(2): 378–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
‪Stafford, Emma & Herrin, Judith (eds). 2005. Personification in the Greek World: ‪From Antiquity to Byzantium. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan T. Gries (eds), 1–16. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Kettler, Sonja, Stroh, Cornelia & Urdze, Aina. 2008. Split Possession: An Areal-linguistic Study of the Alienability Correlation and Related Phenomena in the Languages of Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Andrea & Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verma, Manindra, Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveettil & Verma Mahendra (eds). 1991. Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max, Yates, Alan & Dols, Nicolau. 1999. Catalan. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, Culture and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1999. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yonge, Charles. 1877. Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. New York NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Berno, Francesca Romana
2023. Roman Luxuria, DOI logo
Tur, Cristina
2022. Metonimias y metáforas conceptuales con manus en el teatro latino. Emerita 90:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Tur, Cristina
2024. Concepts that fit in a (Roman) hand. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1  pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Buccheri, Alessandro, Irene De Felice, Chiara Fedriani & William M. Short
2021. Semantic analysis and frequency effects of conceptual metaphors of emotions in Latin. From a corpus-based approach to a dictionary of Latin metaphors. Journal of Latin Linguistics 20:2  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Jiménez Martínez, María Isabel
2020. El movimiento como metáfora. Colocaciones con los verbos de movimiento venio e incido en latín. Nova Tellus 38:2  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.