The metaphorical structuring of kinship in Latin
In this paper, I analyze how concepts related to the domains of space and plants were used by Latin speakers to deliver their culturally specific understanding of (some aspects of) human kinship, in the light of the theory of conceptual metaphor. I go on to claim that analysis of the metaphorical layer of Latin lexicon of kinship can contribute to its “emic” description in ancient Rome, that is, framing it (as much as possible) in concepts near to the Romans’ own experience. First, I describe the contribution that the domains of space and plants makes to the metaphorical structuring of Roman ideas about kinship. Then, I move on to their interplay and to their interaction with Roman images of time, which appear to be ultimately responsible for some of the seemingly odd features of these metaphors. I conclude by trying to spell out some differences between modern and ancient elaborations of the tree as a cultural image.
References
Bader, Françoise
1962 La formation des composés nominaux du latin. Paris: Belles Lettres.
Beltrami, Lucia
1998 Il sangue degli antenati: Stirpe, adulterio e figli senza padre nella cultura romana. Bari: Edipuglia.
Benveniste, Émile
1936 Liber et Liberi.
Revue Des Études Latines 14: 51–8.
Benveniste, Émile
1965 Termes de parenté dans les langues indo-européennes.
L’Homme 5(3–4): 5–16.
Benveniste, Émile
1969 Le Vocabulaire Des Institutions Indeo-européennes. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Bettini, Maurizio
1991 Anthropology and Roman Culture: Kinship, Time, Images of the Soul. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bettini, Maurizio
1999 The Portrait of the Lover. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Bettini, Maurizio
2009 Affari di famiglia: La parentela nella letteratura e nella cultura antica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Bettini, Maurizio & Short, William
2014 Introduzione. In
Con i Romani. Antropologia della cultura antica,
Maurizio Bettini &
William Short (eds), 7–22. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Boroditsky, Lera
2000 Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors.
Cognition 75(1): 1–28.
Boroditsky, Lera
2001 Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time.
Cognitive Psychology 43(1): 1–22.
Boroditsky, Lera & Ramscar, Michael
2002 The roles of body and mind in abstract thought.
Psychological Science 13(2): 185–89.
Bretin-Chabrol, Marine
2012 L’arbre et la lignée: Métaphores végétales de la filiation et de l’alliance en latin classique. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.
Brugman, Claudia & Lakoff, George
1988 Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks. In
Lexical Ambiguity Resolution,
Steven Small,
Garrison Cottrell &
Michael Tanenhaus (eds), 477–507. Palo Alto CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Bruns, Carl Georg
1887 Fontes iuris romani antiqui. Freiburg: Mohr.
Buccheri, Alessandro
2012 Costruire l’umano in termini vegetali. Φύω e φύσις nella tragedia greca.
I Quaderni del Ramo d’Oro Online 5: 137–65.
Casasanto, Daniel
2010 Space for thinking. In
Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions,
Vyvyan Evans &
Paul Chilton (eds), 453–78. London: Equinox.
Casasanto, Daniel & Boroditsky, Lera
2008 Time in the mind: Using space to think about time.
Cognition 106(2): 579–93.
Chilton, Paul A
2010 Introduction. In
Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions,
Vyvyan Evans &
Paul Chilton (eds), 1–18. London: Equinox.
Delbrück, Berthold
1889 Die indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen. Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Alterthumskunde. Lipsia: Hirzel.
Deleuze, Gilles & Guattari, Félix
1987 A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Evans, Vyvyan
2013 Language and Time. Cambridge: CUP.
Evans, Vyvyan & Chilton, Paul
(eds) 2010 Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. London: Equinox.
Fayer, Carla
1994 La familia romana. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.
Flower, Harriet
1996 Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford: Clarendon.
Geertz, Clifford
1983 Local knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York NY: Basic Books.
Guastella, Gianni
1985 La rete del sangue: simbologia delle relazioni e modelli dell’identità nella cultura romana.
Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 15: 49–123.
Johnson, Christopher, Jussen, Bernhard, Warren Sabean, David & Teuscher, Simon
(eds) 2013 Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present. New York NY: Berghahn Books.
Johnson, Mark
1987 The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane
2000 L’ombre des ancêtres: Essai sur l’imaginaire médiéval de la parenté. Paris: Fayard.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2005 Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: CUP.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2006 Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.
Landau, Barbara, Dessalegn, Banchiamlack & Goldberg, Ariel
2010 Language and space: Momentary interactions. In
Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions,
Vyvyan Evans &
Paul Chilton (eds), 51–78. London: Equinox.
Lentano, Mario
2007 La prova del sangue: Storie di identità e storie di legittimità nella cultura latina. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Lloyd, Geoffrey
2007 Cognitive Variations. Oxford: OUP.
Lowe, Dunstan
2010 The symbolic value of grafting in ancient Rome.
Transactions of the American Philological Association 140: 461–88.
Moore, Kevin
2006 Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts.
Cognitive Linguistics 17(2): 199–244.
Murphy, Gregory
1996 On metaphoric representation.
Cognition 60: 173–204.
Núñez, Rafael, Motz, Benjamin & Teuscher, Ursina
2006 Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego-and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time.
Metaphor and Symbol 21(3): 133–46.
Núñez, Rafael & Sweetser, Eve
2006 With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time.
Cognitive Science 30(3): 401–50.
Rosenberg, David & Grafton, Anthony
2010 Cartographies of Time. A History of the Timeline. New York NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
Schadt, Hermann
1982 Die Darstellungen der Arbores consanguinitatis und der Arbores affinitatis: Bildschemata in juristischen Handschriften. Tübingen: Wasmuth.
Short, William
2014 Metafora. In
Con i Romani: Un’antropologia della cultura antica,
Maurizio Bettini &
William Short (eds), 329–52. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Short, William
2013 Latin Dē: A view from cognitive semantics.
Classical Antiquity 32(2): 378–405.
Thomas, Yan
1988 Le droit romain. Le traité des computs du jureconsulte Paul. In
Le dossier occidentale de la parenté. Textes juridiques indésirables sur la généalogie,
Pierre Legendre (ed.), 27–119. Paris: Fayard.
Traugott, Elizabeth
1975 Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing: A contribution to the study of semantic fields.
Semiotica 15(3): 207–230.
Tyler, Andrea & Evans, Vyvyan
2003 The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.
Violi, Patrizia
1997 Significato ed esperienza. Milan: Bompiani.
Voci, Pasquale
1982 Linee storiche del diritto ereditario romano I.
ANRW 2(14): 391–448.
Watson, Alan
1971 The Law of Succession in the Later Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Buccheri, Alessandro, Irene De Felice, Chiara Fedriani & William M. Short
2021.
Semantic analysis and frequency effects of conceptual metaphors of emotions in Latin. From a corpus-based approach to a dictionary of Latin metaphors.
Journal of Latin Linguistics 20:2
► pp. 163 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.