Part of
New Approaches to English Linguistics: Building bridges
Edited by Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja and Sarah Chevalier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 177] 2016
► pp. 112
References (23)
References
Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus & Kautzsch, Alexander (eds). 2014. The Evolution of Englishes. The Dynamic Model and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. English as a Global Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan. 2006. How random is a corpus? The library metaphor. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2): 177–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2010. Methodological skills in corpus linguistics: A polemic and some pointers towards quantitative methods. In Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching, Tony Harris & María Moreno Jaén (eds), 121–146. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012. Corpus linguistics, theoretical linguistics, and cognitive/psycholinguistics: Towards more and more fruitful exchanges. In Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English. Theory and Description, Joybrato Mukherjee & Magnus Huber (eds), 41–63. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Quantitative designs and statistical techniques. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 50–71. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Gut, Ulrike (eds). 2012. Mapping Unity and Diversity Worldwide. Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English around the World G43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura A. 2013. Cognitive Linguistics. The Quantitative Turn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1992. Models for non-native Englishes. In The Other Tongue. English Across Cultures, Braj B. Kachru (ed.), 48–74. Chicago IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro, Padró, Muntsa, Poibeau, Thierry & Villavicencio, Aline (eds). 2014. Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (CogACLL), April 2014, Gothenburg, Sweden. Athens: Association for Computational Linguistics. <[URL]> (29 June 2015).
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Marianne Hundt. 2011. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Hodgetts Syder, Frances. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In Language and Communication, Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds), 191–226. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey & McCarthy, Diana (eds). 2004. Corpus Linguistics. Readings in a Widening Discipline. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of new Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Postcolonial English. Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2003. Isolation and Language Change. Contemporary and Sociohistorical Evidence from Tristan da Cunha English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schulte in Walde, Sabine & Melinger, Alissa. 2008. An in-depth look into the co-occurrence distribution of semantic associates. Italian Journal of Linguistics. Special Issue on From Context to Meaning. Distributional Models of the Lexicon in Linguistics and Cognitive Science 20(1): 89–128.Google Scholar
Strevens, Peter. 1980. Teaching English as an International Language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Noord, Gertjan & Bouma, Gosse. 2009. Parsed corpora for linguistics. In Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on the Interaction between Linguistics and Computational Linguistics. Virtuous, Vicious or Vacuous? 33–39. Athens: Association for Computational Linguistics. <[URL]> (29 June 2015) DOI logo
Walenski, Matthew & Ullman, Michael T. 2005. The science of language. The Linguistic Review 22: 327–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar