Cover not available
Part of
New Approaches to English Linguistics: Building bridges
Edited by Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja and Sarah Chevalier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 177] 2016
► pp. 117–140

Dialect contact influences on the use of get and the get-passive

| Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
get is a highly frequent and multifunctional English verb but has so far gone unnoticed in variationist studies of World Englishes. This study aims at exploring to what extent dialect contact contributes to the variation of get in British, Jamaican, and Singaporean English, in particular to variation in the frequencies of its word-forms and in the use of the get-passive. For that purpose, all tokens of get in the ICE (International Corpus of English) corpora of Great Britain, Jamaica, and Singapore were analysed for form and meaning. The results demonstrate that influence from the major standard varieties British and American English as well as substrate influence can be made responsible for the variation of get.
Keywords: GET-passive, word-forms, World Englishes, substrate influence, dialect contact
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Token frequencies of get and its word-forms
    • 2.1Overall token frequencies of get across varieties
    • 2.2The distribution of the word-forms of get across varieties
  • 3.The get-passive
    • 3.1The nature of the (get-) passive
    • 3.2Factors influencing the variation of the get-passive
      • 3.2.1Prescriptivism
      • 3.2.2Colloquialisation
      • 3.2.3Substrate influence
      • 3.2.4Mode
    • 3.3The special meaning and use of the get-passive
    • 3.4Summary of the hypotheses
    • 3.5Results from the data
      • 3.5.1Frequencies
      • 3.5.2Mode
      • 3.5.3Use and meaning
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.177.05bru
References (37)
References
Allsopp, Richard (ed.). 2003[1996]. Dictionary of Caribbean English Usage. Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Wee, Lionel. 1999. The passive in Singapore English. World Englishes 18(1): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2009. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Leech, Geoffrey. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biewer, Carolin. 2009. Passive constructions in Fiji English: A corpus-based study. In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds), 361–377. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Robert W. (ed.). 1996. The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage, 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Yao, Xinyue. 2013. Colloquial features in World Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4): 479–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1971. Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, Dell Hymes (ed.), 349-370. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1998. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 4: 1776–1997, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 2007. Singapore English. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2005. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Farquharson, Joseph T. 2013a. Jamaican. In The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. 1: English-based and Dutch-based Languages, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds), 81–91. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013b. Jamaican structure dataset. In Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (27 November 2013).
Givón, Talmy. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy & Yang, Lynne. 1994. The rise of the English get-passive. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 119–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2011. Corpus data in usage-based linguistics: What’s the right degree of granularity for the analysis of argument structure constructions? In Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion [Human Cognitive Processing 32], Mario Brdar, Stefan T. Gries & Milena Žic Fuchs (eds), 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Passive constructions. In The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds), 358–361. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hasselgren, Angela. 1994. Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2): 237–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübler, Axel. 1998. The Expressivity of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2001. What corpora tell us about the grammaticalisation of voice in get-constructions. Studies in Language 25(1): 49–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds). 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (3 November 2014).
Lee, Nala Huiying, Ping, Ling Ai & Nomoto, Hiroki. 2009. Colloquial Singapore English got: Functions and substratal influences. World Englishes 28(3): 293–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2012. Standards of English in South-East Asia. In Standards of English: Codified Varieties Around the World, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 274–293. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa & Ansaldo, Umberto. 2013a. Colloquial Singapore English (Singlish). In The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English, Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (17 March 2014).
. 2013b. Singlish structure dataset. In Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Susanne Maria Michaelis et al. (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (27 November 2013).
Lindquist, Hans. 2009. Corpus Linguistics and the Description of English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2007. Varieties of English around the world: Collocational and cultural profiles. In Phraseology and Culture in English, Paul Skandera (ed.), 437–468. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian & Sand, Andrea. n.d. The English language in Jamaica. <[URL]> (1 November 2013).
Newman, John & Rice, Sally. 2006. Transitivity schemas of English eat and drink in the BNC. In Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, Stefan T. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 225–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter. 2013. Jamaican Creole. In The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English, Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (17 March 2014).
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sand, Andrea. 2013. Jamaican English. In The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English, Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (17 March 2014).
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John McHardy. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1993. Predication in Caribbean English Creoles [Creole Language Library 10].Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Hundt, Marianne, Bethany Dallas & Shimon Nakanishi
2024. The be‐ versus get‐passive alternation in world Englishes. World Englishes 43:1 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Fehringer, Carol
2022. Theget-passive in Tyneside English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 43:3 ► pp. 330 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.