This paper discusses utterance-final uses of intensifying adverbs (absolutely, definitely, really and totally), which are often ambiguous in terms of their syntactic status between postposed clausal constituents and extra-clausal units. These adverbs are analyzed as macrogrammatical elements serving different cognitive tasks arising at one particular point in the linear production of an utterance, namely its potential end, such as modifying illocutionary force and strengthening the display of alignment with the co-participant’s views. As part of macrogrammar, they accompany a microgrammatical unit, which is characterized by internal morphosyntactic dependency relations. Final intensifying adverbs are showcase examples of the piece-by-piece emergence of linguistic structure in on-line speech production and thus require an analytic approach based on the linearity of speaking in time.
Auer, Peter. 1996. On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In Prosody in Conversation. Interactional Studies, Elizabeth Couper Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds), 57–100. Cambridge: CUP.
Auer, Peter. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25 (1): 7–36.
Auer, Peter. 2006. Increments and more. Anmerkungen zur augenblicklichen Diskussion über die Erweiterbarkeit von Turnkonstruktionseinheiten. In Grammatik und Interaktion, Arnulf Deppermann, Reinhard Fiehler & Thomas Spranz-Fogasy (eds), 279–294. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
Auer, Peter. 2009. On-line syntax: thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31: 1–13.
Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan (eds). 2011. Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich (eds). 2014. Discourse Functions at the Right and Left Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill.
Berendonner, Alain. 1990. Pour une macro-syntaxe. Travaux de Linguistique 21: 25–36.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2003. Le recouvrement de la syntaxe et de la macro-syntaxe. In Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique. L’analyse linguistique de l’oral, Antonietta Scarano (ed.), 53–75. Firenze: Bulzoni.
Chafe, Wallace. 1992. Intonation units and prominences in English natural discourse.
Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on prosody in natural speech
, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, Report No. 92-37[R1] . Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Cheshire, Jenny. 2007. Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2): 155–193.
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Du Bois, John W. & Giora, Rachel. 2014. From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 351–357.
Duden-Grammatik. 2009. Die Grammatik. Published by the Dudenredaktion. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Eisenberg, Peter. 2006. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik, Vol. 2: Der Satz. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134–184. Cambridge: CUP.
Goodwin, Charles. 2006. Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves. Text and Talk 26(4/5): 443–461.
Haselow, Alexander. 2012. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language & Communication 32(3): 182–204.
Haselow, Alexander. 2015. Left vs. right periphery in grammaticalization: The case of anyway. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series 166], Andrew Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds), 157–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Grammatikalisierung: Von der Performanz zur Kompetenz ohne angeborene Grammatik. In Gibt es eine Sprache hinter dem Sprechen?, Sybille Krämer & Ekkehard König (eds), 262–286. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hennig, Mathilde. 2013. Die Ellipse. Neue Perspektiven auf ein altes Phänomen. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Holmes, Janet. 1988. Of course: A pragmatic particle in New Zealand woman’s and men’s speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8(1): 49–74.
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–157.
Hopper, Paul J. 1998. Emergent grammar. In The New Psychology of Language, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 155–175. Mahwah NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Hopper, Paul J. 2004. The openness of grammatical constructions. Chicago Linguistic Society 40: 239–256.
Hopper, Paul J. 2011. Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds), 22–44. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. Language description: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 852–897.
Lerner, Gene. 1996. On the ‘semi-permeable character’ of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Interaction and Grammar, Eleonore Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra Thompson (eds), 238–276. Cambridge: CUP.
Lewis, Diana. 2003. Rhetorical motivations for the emergence of discourse particles, with special reference to English of course. In Particles, Ton van der Wouden, Ad Foolen & Piet van de Craen (eds). Special issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics
16: 79–91.
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte NC: Information Age.
Linell, Per & Mertzlufft, Christine. 2014. Evidence for a dialogical grammar: Reactive constructions in Swedish and German. In Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation, Susanne Günthner, Wolfgang Imo & Jörg Bücker (eds), 1–32. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: OUP.
Merchant, Jason. 2005. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(6): 661–738.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2011. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: The on-line formatting of left and right dislocations in French conversation. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds), 45–87. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pichler, Heike & Levey, Stephen. 2011. In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: general extenders in Northeast England. English Language & Linguistics 15(3): 441–471.
Pierrhumbert, Janet & Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in Communication, Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds), 271–311. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, John M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: CUP.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 52–133. Cambridge: CUP.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Aijmer, Karin. 2002. The expectation marker of course. Languages in Contrast 4(1): 13–43.
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6): 701–721.
Stenström, Ana-Brita & Jørgensen, Annette M. 2008. La función fática de los apelativos en la conversación juvenil de Madrid y Londres.
Actas del III Congreso EDICE
, Universidad de Valencia, 1-14.
Tagliamonte, Sali & Denis, Derek. 2010. The stuff of change: General extenders in Toronto, Canada. Journal of English Linguistics 38(4): 335–368.
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2009. Tag Questions in English – The First Century. Journal of English Linguistics 37(2): 130–161.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2012. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. In Intersections of Intersubjectivity, Liselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds). Special issue of English Text Construction 5(1): 7–28.
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, Vol. 1–3. Berlin: De Gruyter.
2016. Elément de macro-syntaxe : comment catégoriser une classe insaississable ?. Modèles linguistiques XXXVIII:74 ► pp. 11 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.