Cover not available
Part of
Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents
Edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 178] 2016
► pp. 417–446

Aspects of discourse marker sequencing

Empirical challenges and theoretical implications

| University of Vienna
| University of New Mexico
In research on Discourse Markers (DMs) it has long been noted that DMs frequently occur in sequences, e.g., oh well or you know I mean. Despite the ubiquity of this phenomenon and occasional citations of examples in studies on individual DMs, the combinatory behavior of DMs has received only limited attention as a theoretically relevant phenomenon in its own right. This chapter provides an overview of the phenomenon that synthesizes the results of prior research, complemented with new analyses of our own. We separately address two different aspects of DM sequencing. The first is the question of co-occurrence of DMs, that is, which DMs combine frequently with one another. The second aspect concerns the ordering of DMs when occurring in sequence. In discussing the results of empirical studies of both of these aspects we outline what research on DMs and the structure of the clause periphery stands to gain from studying DM sequences.
Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.14loh
References (55)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguisics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Pragmatic markers in spoken interlanguage. Nordic Journal of English Studies 3(1): 173–190.Google Scholar
. 2011. Well I’m not sure I think… The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(2): 231-254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle. 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. In A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 84]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne. 2005. Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen [Linguistik - Impulse und Tendenzen 9], Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah de Groodt (eds), 335-362. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Alton J. 1988. Language in particular: A lecture. In Linguistics in Context: Lectures from the 1985 LSA/TESOL and NEH Institutes, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 17-35, Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bouma, Gerlof. 2009. Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. In Von der Form zur Bedeutung: Texte automatisch verarbeiten / From Form to Meaning: Processing Texts Automatically, Proceedings of the Biennial GSCL Conference 2009, Chiarcos, Eckart de Castilho & Stede (eds), 31–40. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Brizuela, Maquela, Andersen, Elaine & Stallings, Lynne. 1999. Discourse markers as indicators of register. Hispania 82(1): 128–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cieri, Christopher, Graff, David, Kimball, Owen, Miller, Dave & Walker, Kevin. 2004a. Fisher English Training Speech, Part 1: Transcripts. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
. 2004b. Fisher English Training Speech, Part 1: Speech. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
. 2005a. Fisher English Training Speech, Part 2: Transcripts. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Fisher English Training Speech, Part 2: Speech. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2002. Speaking in time. Speech Communication 36: 5-13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuenca, Maria-Josep & Marín, Maria-Josep. 2009. Co-occurrence of discourse markers in Catalan and Spanish oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics 41(5): 899–914. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Anne. 1983. Speakers’ conceptions of the functions of prosody. In Prosody: Models and Measurements, Anne Cutler & D. Robert Ladd (eds), 80–91. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D'Arcy, Alexandra Faith. 2005. Like: Syntax and Development. PhD Dissertation. Toronto.Google Scholar
Diani, Giuliana. 2004. The discourse functions of I don’t know in English conversation. In Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 120], Karin Aijmer & Anna-Brita Stenström (eds), 151-171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. 2014. So pues entonces: An examination of bilingual discourse markers in Spanish oral narratives of personal experience of New York City-born Puerto Ricans. Sociolinguistic Studies 8 (1): 57–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics 1(2): 293-320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The sequencing of contrastive discourse markers in English. Baltic Journal of the English Language, Literature, and Culture 1: 29-35.Google Scholar
. 2013. Combinations of contrastive discourse markers in English. International Review of Pragmatics 5: 318–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gansner, Emden R., Koutsofios, Eleftherios, North, Stephen C. & Vo, Kiem-Phong. 1993. A technique for drawing directed graphs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 19(3): 214–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gansner, Emden R. & Koutsofios, Eleftherios. 2006. Drawing Graphs with Dot: Dot's User's Manual. <[URL]>
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3603-3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Haiping Long. 2013. An outline of discourse grammar. In Reflections on Functionalism in linguistics, Bischoff, Shannon & Carmen Jeny (eds), 155-206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Hirschberg, J. & Litman, D. 1993. Empirical studies on the disambiguation of cue phrases. Computational Linguistics 19: 501-530.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 19(1)], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds) 17-35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Ben. 2003. Automatic classification of discourse markers on the basis of their co-occurrences. In Proceedings of the ESSLLI Workshop The Meaning and Implementation of Discourse Particles , Manfred Stede & Henk Zeevat (eds), 1-8. Nancy.
Knott, Alistair. 1996. A Data-driven Methodology for Motivating a Set of Coherence Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Koops, Christian & Lohmann, Arne. 2015. A quantitative approach to the grammaticalization of discourse markers: Evidence from their sequencing behavior. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(2): 232-259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee-Goldman, Russell. 2011. No as a discourse marker. Journal of Pragmatics 43(10): 2627–2649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, William & Cutler, Anne. 1983. Prosodic marking in speech repair. Journal of Semantics 2: 205-217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael. 1994. Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society 23(3): 325–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Simone. 2005. Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Dinah. 1979. Well. Linguistic Inquiry 10(4): 727- 32.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2010. Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 866–891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oates, Sarah Louise. 2000. Multiple discourse marker occurrence: Creating hierarchies for Natural Language. In Proceedings of the 3rd CLUK Colloquium , Brighton, 41-45.
. 2001. Multiple Discourse Marker Occurrence: Creating Hierarchies for Natural Language Generation. MA dissertation, University of Brighton.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo & Baayen, Harald. 2009. Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85(1): 109–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redeker, Gisela. 1991. Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics 29: 1139–1172.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds), 54-75. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1999. Discourse markers. Tutorial overview. Lingua 107: 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Rethinking well . Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1025-1060. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sara & Jucker, Andreas. 2002. Discourse markers as turns. In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics meets Conversational Interaction, Anita Fetzer & Christiane Meierkord (eds), 151-178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struckmaier, Volker. 2014. Ja doch wohl C? Modal particles in German as C-related elements. Studia Linguistica 68(1): 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2016. Teen Talk: The Language of Adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Thurmaier, Maria. 1991. Combinatorial regularities for modal particles and their use as an instrument of analysis. Multilingua 10(1-2): 19–42.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1997. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at ICHL XII, Manchester, UK, 2005.
Vicher, Anne & Sankoff, David. 1989. The emergent syntax of pre-sentential turn openings. Journal of Pragmatics 13: 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2007. À propos de la genèse diachronique des combinaisons de marqueurs. L’exemple de bon ben et enfin bref . Langue Francaise 154: 94–109.Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Shirtz, Shahar
2024. Discourse markers as the locus of signaling the main-event line in Alsea narratives. Linguistics 62:1 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Dobrego, Aleksandra, Alena Konina & Anna Mauranen
2023. Continuous speech segmentation by L1 and L2 speakers of English: the role of syntactic and prosodic cues. Language Awareness 32:3 ► pp. 487 ff. DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2023. Chapter 4. On the rise of a marker of disaffiliation from Others’ discourse. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Bourgeois, Samuel
2022. “Oh yeah, one more thing: It’s gonna be huge.”. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105], ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Kazemian, Reza & Mohammad Amouzadeh
2022. Aspects ofvæ(‘and’) as a discourse marker in Persian. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:4 ► pp. 588 ff. DOI logo
Lewis, Diana M.
2021. Chapter 13. Pragmatic markers at the periphery and discourse prominence. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Abraham, Werner
2020. Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics, DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander
2020. Chapter 8. Local and global structures in discourse and interaction. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
2020. Chapter 2. Dual process frameworks on reasoning and linguistic discourse. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2020. Chapter 5. Dichotomous or continuous?. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2021. Chapter 3. Presentation followed by negotiation. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Ranger, Graham
2018. Chapter 8. ‘I think’. In Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197], ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Discourse Structuring Markers in English [Constructional Approaches to Language, 33], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.