Cover not available
Part of
Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches
Edited by Valentina Vapnarsky and Edy Veneziano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 182] 2017
► pp. 243–271

Two classes of verbs in Northern Australian languages

Implications for the typology of polycategoriality

| University of Manchester
This paper discusses some of the implications for the typology of parts of speech – including the notion of polycategoriality – of the existence, in some Australian languages, of two clearly distinct lexical categories which meet the common definition of “verb”. Both appear exclusively in predicative function, but only one of them can form independent predicates, while the other is restricted to dependent predication. It is argued that the commonly assumed set of universal major parts of speech, even if conceived of as prototypes, is eurocentric and should be replaced by a more fine-grained set of syntacto-pragmatic functions which are better suited to identifying categorial overlap, and allow us to give proper consideration to more specialised parts of speech.
Keywords: parts of speech, dependent predicates, ideophones, preverbs, closed-class verbs, subordination, Australian languages
Article outline
  • 1.“Non-verbal verbs” as a distinct part of speech
    • 1.1Introduction
    • 1.2Two classes of verbs
  • 2.Parts of speech in Jaminjung
    • 2.1Background information on Jaminjung
    • 2.2Part of speech differentiation
  • 3.Functions of Uninflecting Verbs (UVs) in Jaminjung
    • 3.1Uninflecting Verbs as second predicate in complex predicates
    • 3.2Uninflecting Verbs as main predicate in adverbial clauses
    • 3.3Uninflecting Verbs as pragmatically dependent predicates
    • 3.4Uninflecting Verbs as mimetic predicates
    • 3.5Summary
  • 4.Implications for the notion of polycategoriality
    • 4.1Including dependent predication in the typology of parts of speech
    • 4.2An ATV perspective on more minor “dependent predicates”
    • 4.3Polycategoriality in an ATV perspective
    • 4.4Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 1 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.182.09sch
References (88)
References
Amberber, M., Baker, B. & Harvey, M. (eds). 2010. Complex Predicates. Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, F.K. 2001. Ideophones and the nature of the adjective class in Ewe. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 25–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amha, A. 2010. Compound verbs and ideophones in Wolaitta revisited. In Amberber, Baker & Harvey (eds), 259–290. Google Scholar
Backhouse, A.E. 2004. Inflected and uninflected adjectives in Japanese. In Adjective Classes. A Cross-linguistic Typology, R.M.W. Dixon & A.Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 50–73. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baker, B. & Harvey, M. 2010. Complex predicate formation. In Amberber, Baker & Harvey (eds), 13–47. Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2002. The Typology of Parts of Speech Systems: The Markedness of Adjectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhat, D.N.S. 1994. The Adjectival Category: Criteria for Differentiation and Identification [Studies in Language Companion Series 24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, C. & Lindlar, M. 1998. Alles Kölsch. Eine Dokumentation der aktuellen Stadtsprache in Köln. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Birk, D.B.W. 1976. The Malakmalak Language of Daly River (Western Arnhem Land) [Pacific Linguistics, Series B, 45]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Bisang, W. 2010. Precategoriality and syntax-based parts of speech: The case of Late Archaic Chinese. In Parts of Speech: Empirical and Theoretical Advances [Benjamins Current Topics 25], U. Ansaldo, J. Don & R. Pfau (eds), 65–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G. & van Kemenade, A. 2003. Preverbs: An introduction. In Yearbook of Morphology 2003, G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds), 1–11. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broschart, J. 1991. Noun, verb, and participation (A typology of the noun/verb-distinction). In Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen, H. Seiler & W. Premper (eds), 65–137. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
. 1997. Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology 1: 123–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, M. 1997. Complex predicates in Urdu. In Complex Predicates, A. Alsina, J. Bresnan & P. Sells (eds), 107–149. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2010. The light verb jungle - still hacking away. In Amberber, Baker & Harvey (eds), 48–78. Google Scholar
Butt, M. & Geuder, W. 2001. On the (semi)lexical status of light verbs. In Semi-lexical Categories. The Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words, H. Van Riemsdijk & N. Corver (eds), 323–370. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capell, A. 1979. Classification of verbs in Australian languages. In Australian Linguistic Studies [Pacific Linguistics, Series C, 54], S.A. Wurm (ed), 229–322. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Cook, A. 1988. Participle sentences in Wakiman. In Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 15], P. Austin (ed), 69–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 2000. Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, M.P. Vogel & B. Comrie (eds), 65–102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dench, A.C. 1995. Martuthunira. A language of the Pilbara Region of Western Australia [Pacific Linguistics, Series C, 125]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Dickinson, C. 2002. Complex Predicates in Tsafiki. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 2001. The Australian linguistic area. In Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance. Problems in Comparative Linguistics, A.Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds), 64–104. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspective. In Adjective Classes. A Cross-linguistic Typology, R.M.W. Dixon & A.Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1–49. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1977. Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 1: 19–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, I. Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Evans, N.D. 1995. A Grammar of Kayardild with Historical-comparative Notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. & Osada, T. 2005. Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9: 351–390.Google Scholar
Foley, W.A. 1986. The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gil, D. 2000. Syntactic categories, cross-linguistic variation and universal grammar. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, P.M. Vogel & B. Comrie (eds), 173–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1984. Syntax. A Functional-typological Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haig, G. 2000. Anatomy of a closed word class: Frequency, regularity and productivity of verbs in Kurdish. Ms, Philipps-Universität Marburg.Google Scholar
Hale, K. 1982. Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In Papers in Warlpiri grammar memory of Lothar Jagst, S.M. Swartz (ed.), 217–315. Berrimah NT: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1994. Core structures and adjunctions in Warlpiri syntax. In Studies in Scrambling. Movement and Non-Movement Approaches to Free Word-Order Phenomena, N. Corver & H. van Riemsdijk (eds), 185–219. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, M. 2008. Proto Mirndi. A Discontinuous Language Family in Northern Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. & König, E. 1995. Converbs in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 1980. Nunggubuyu Myths and Ethnographic Texts. Canberra: AIAS.Google Scholar
. 1984. Functional Grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: AIAS.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K. 1992a. Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992b. Parts of speech. In Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 23], M. Fortescue, P. Harder & L. Kristoffersen (eds), 29–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K., Rijkhoff, J. & Siewierska, A. 2004. Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics 40: 527–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N.P & Schultze-Berndt, E.. 2005. Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives, N.P. Himmelmann & E. Schultze-Berndt (eds), 1–67. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J. 1996. Discourse and the construction of categories. Berkeley Linguistic Society 22: 159–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & Thompson, S.A. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60: 703–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985. The iconicity of the universal categories 'noun' and 'verb'. In Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], J. Haiman (ed.), 151–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. 1978. The Core of Walmatjari Grammar. Canberra: AIAS.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 2010[1911]. The role of the verb. In Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen, 321–326. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kinkade, M.D. 1983. Salish evidence against the universality of "noun" and "verb". Lingua 60: 25–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kofod, F.M. 1996. Verb stems in the Jarragan languages of the East Kimberley. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society , Canberra.
Kulemeka, A.T.C. 1995. Sound symbolic and grammatical frameworks: A typology of ideophones in Asian and African languages. South African Journal of African Languages 15: 73–84.Google Scholar
Laughren, M. 2010. Warlpiri verbs of change and causation: The thematic core. In Amberber, Baker & Harvey (eds), 176–236. Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. 2008. Roots, stems and word classes. Studies in Language 32: 546–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lois, X. & Vapnarsky, V. 2006. Root indeterminacy and polyvalence in Yukatekan Mayan languages. In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, X. Lois & V. Vapnarsky (eds), 69–115. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, 2 Vols. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McGregor, W.B. 1990. A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Sound symbolism in Gooniyandi, a language of Western Australia. Word 47: 339–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Ideophones as the source of verbs in Northern Australian languages. In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 205–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, W.B. 2002. Verb Classification in Australian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merlan, F.C. 1994. A Grammar of Wardaman. A Language of the Northern Territory of Australia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M. 2000. Noun and verb in Iroquoian languages: Multicategorisation from multiple criteria. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, P.M. Vogel & B. Comrie (eds), 379–420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 1975. Verb borrowing. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 8: 3–30.Google Scholar
Nash, D. 1982. Warlpiri verb roots and preverbs. In Papers in Warlpiri Grammar, in memory of Lothar Jagst, S. Swartz (ed), 165–216. Berrimah, NT: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1986. Topics in Warlpiri Grammar. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
. 2007 (1998). Warlpiri verbs roots. Slightly amended version of appendix to Nash's Topics in Warlpiri Grammar (1980, 1986). Created: 23 April 1998, Last modified: 18 July 2007. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62: 56–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, I. 2007. Constructional Economy and nonfinite independent clauses. In Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, I. Nikolaeva (ed.), 138–180. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, R. 1998. A Grammar of Wambaya, Northern Territory (Australia) [Pacific Linguistics, Series C, 140]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J.B. 1996. Sounds like Life: Sound-symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. 1992. Kalam Pandanus Language – An old New Guinea experiment in language engineering. In The Language Game. Papers in Memory of Donald Laycock [Pacific Linguistics, Seies C, 110], T. Dutton, M. Ross & D. Tryon (eds), 313–334. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
. 1993. A language that defies description by ordinary means. In The Role of Theory in Language Description, W.A. Foley (ed.), 87–129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustet, R. 2000. How arbitrary is lexical categorization? Verb vs. adjectives. Linguistic Typology 4: 175–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rauh, G. 2010. Syntactic Categories: Their Identification and Description in Linguistic Theories. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Reid, N.J. 1990. Ngan'gityemerri. A language of the Daly River region, Northern Territory of Australia. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Rumsey, A. 1982. An Intra-sentence Grammar of Ungarinjin, North-Western Australia [Pacific Linguistics, Series B, 86]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Samarin, W. 1971. Survey of Bantu ideophones. African Language Studies 12: 130–168.Google Scholar
Sasse, H.-J. 1993a. Das Nomen – eine universelle Kategorie? Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 46: 187–221.Google Scholar
. 1993b. Syntactic categories and subcategories. In Syntax, J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld & T. Vennemann (eds), 646–686. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. 2000. Simple and Complex Verbs in Jaminjung: A Study of Event Categorisation in an Australian Language. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
. 2001. Ideophone-like Characteristics of Uninflected Predicates in Jaminjung (Australia). In Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz (eds), 355–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Preverbs as an open word class in Northern Australian languages: Synchronic and diachronic correlates. In Yearbook of Morphology 2003, G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds), 145–177. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. & Himmelmann, N.P. 2004. Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 8: 59–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1986. Classifiers, verb classifiers, and verbal categories. Berkeley Linguistic Society 12: 497–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.C. 2010. Lexical categories and pragmatic functions. Linguistics 48: 717–777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Lier, E. 2009. Parts of Speech and Dependent Clauses: A Typological Study [LOT dissertation series 221]. Utrecht: LOT publications.Google Scholar
Voeltz, F.K.E. & Kilian-Hatz, C. 2001. Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. 1999. Coverbs and Complex Predicates in Wagiman. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, J. 2009. A Typology of Verbal Borrowings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Mora-Bustos, Armando
2022. Predicados no nucleares en mazahua (otomangue). Lengua y Sociedad 21:2 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Ross, Daniel
2022. Chapter 14. Pseudocoordination and Serial Verb Constructions as Multi-Verb Predicates. In Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 274], ► pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Shaw, Marlieke & Hendrik De Smet
2022. Loan Word Accommodation Biases: Markedness and Finiteness. Transactions of the Philological Society 120:2 ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Krauße, Daniel & Mark Harvey
2021. Complex predication and adverbial modification in Wagiman. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:1 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Aldai, Gontzal
2020. Complex predicates, simple inflecting verbs, and “uninflecting verbs” in Pre-Basque. Linguistics 58:6 ► pp. 1609 ff. DOI logo
Sansò, Andrea
2020. Routes Towards The Irrealis. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3 ► pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Kemmerer, David
2019. Concepts in the Brain, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.