Part of
Negation and Contact: With special focus on Singapore EnglishEdited by Debra Ziegeler and Zhiming Bao
[Studies in Language Companion Series 183] 2017
► pp. 63–80
Edited by Debra Ziegeler and Zhiming Bao
[Studies in Language Companion Series 183] 2017
► pp. 63–80
Chapter 4A positive polarity focus particle under negation
Not also and the impact of pragmatic activation
This chapter reviews the three types of relations of negation with linguistic expressions. Items are in focus, or out of focus and in scope, or out of scope of negation. Out of scope is characteristic of positive polarity items, yet their relation to negation is modified in activated, discourse-old propositions. Thus of also in the direct scope of clausal negation, as demonstrated by this corpus study. A PPI being part of an activated proposition over which the negation ranges as a whole makes it unnecessary to compute an unavailable interpretation for the relation between the negative and the PPI. The significance of the work is to show the extensive intervention of activation for the interpretation of negation.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Quantifier all and the tripartite relation to negation
- 3. Also in the scope of negation requires activation
- 5.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements -
Notes -
References
References (14)
Beyssade, Claire. 2010.
Seulement et ses usages scalaires. Langue Française 165: 103–124. 
Cheung, Lawrence Yam-Leung. 2009. Negative wh-construction and its semantic properties. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18(3): 197–232.
Cirillo, Robert J. 2013. On the lack of stranded negated quantifiers and inverse scope of negation in Romance. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 5], Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen, Luisa Meroni & Manuela Pinto (eds), 59–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Crnic, Luka. 2013. How to get even with desires and imperatives. In Beyond ‘Any’ and ‘Ever’. New Explorations in Negative Polarity Sensitivity, Eva Csipak, Regine Eckardt, Mingya Liu & Manfred Sailer (eds), 127–153. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Déprez, Viviane, Tubau, Susagna, Cheylus, Anne & Espinal, Maria Teresa. 2015. Double negation in a negative concord language: An experimental investigation. Lingua 163: 75–107.
Gunlogson, Christine. 2008. A question of commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 101–136.
Han, Chunghye. 2002. Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua 112: 112–229.
Horn, Laurence R. 2001. A Natural History of Negation. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Larrivée, Pierre. 2012. Positive polarity, negation, activated propositions. Linguistics 50(4): 869–900.
. 2001. L’interprétation des séquences négatives: Portée et foyer des négations en Français. Brussels: Duculot.
Romero, Maribel. 2014, High negation in subjunctive conditionals and polar questions? In Sinn und Bedeutung 19, Eva Csipak & Hedde Zeijlstra (eds), 499–516.
Seuren, Pieter A. M. 1985. Discourse Semantics. London: Routledge.
Spector, Benjamin. 2014. Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity. Semantics and Pragmatics 7(11): 1–61.
Tottie, Gunnel & Neukom-Hermann, Anja. 2010. Quantifier-negation interaction in English: A corpus linguistic study of all…not constructions. In The Expression of Negation, Laurence R. Horn (ed.), 149–185. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Yamada, Aaron
2024. A diachronic analysis of Spanish alg- series and n- series items in negated clauses. Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.