References

References

Abraham, Werner
2017Discourse marker = discourse particle = thetical = modal particle? A futile comparison. In Discourse Particles – Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 241–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
In press. Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte. In MISU-Sammelband, Shin Tanaka & Elisabeth Leiss eds
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16: 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–50. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano & Ramat, Paolo
1996Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2015Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages und Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from Going Romance, Amsterdam 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1], Enoch Aboh, Aafke Hulk, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty J.
2006Semantic and pragmatic contributions to information status. In Explorations in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Ken Turner (eds). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38: 14–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
2006Mitigation. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, William L.
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, subject, topic, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1976[1991] Mica: note di sintassi e pragmatica. In Teoria linguistica e sintassi italiana, Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 311–323. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2008Modal particles in Italian. Working papers in Linguistics University of Venice 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola
2013Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Waltereit, Richard
2009Diachronic pathways and pragmatic strategies: different types of pragmatic particles from a diachronic point of view. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 43–61. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Approaches to Discourse Particles [Studies in Pragmatics 1], Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 403–425. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1996Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 475–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell Vidal, María Vitoria
2010Futuro y evidencialidad. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 26: 9–34.Google Scholar
Espinal, María Teresa
1993The interpretation of no-pas in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 353–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 La negació . In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Joan Solà, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró, Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 2727–2797. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Miola, Emanuele
2014French déjà, Piedmontese Regional Italian già: A case of contact-induced pragmaticalization. In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance languages, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 166–189. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara
2014The development of discourse and pragmatic markers. In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 10–26. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen Mosegaard, Maj-Britt
2009The grammaticalization of negative reinforcers in Old and Middle French: A discourse-functional approach. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 227–251. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen Mosegaard, Maj-Britt & Visconti, Jacqueline
2009On the diachrony of reinforced negation in French and Italian. In Grammaticalization and pragmatics. Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues, Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds), 137–171. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012The evolution of negation in French and Italian: Similarities and differences. Folia Linguistica 46: 453–482.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard Mervyn
1970Meaning and speech acts. Philosophical Review 79: 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2012Mirativity does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16: 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1994Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1981A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. In Papers from the 17th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 164–171. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Parry, Mair
1997The Dialects of Italy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera
1988Fenomeni della negazione dal latino all’italiano. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Nocentini, Alberto
2003La cosiddetta negazione espletiva in italiano. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 88: 72–90.Google Scholar
Olbertz, Hella
2009Mirativity and exclamatives in functional discourse grammar: Evidence from Spanish. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 82: 66–82. Amsterdam: Functional Grammar Foundation.Google Scholar
Parry, Mair
2013Negation in the history of Italo-Romance. In The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Vol. 1: Case Studies, David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds), 77–118. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego
2009Presuppositional negation and the {addressee}. Padua Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 22–29.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego & Penello, Nicoletta
2008Osservazioni su mica in italiano e alcuni dialetti veneti. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 8.Google Scholar
2012L’avverbio mica tra widening semantico e restrizioni sintattiche. In Linguaggio e cervello / Semantica, Atti del XLII Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica italiana (SLI), Pisa (25–27 September 2008), Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini & Irene Ricci (eds). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A.
2010Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds), 15–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981Toward a taxonomy of Given-New information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William S. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reese, Brian J.
2006The meaning and use of negative polar interrogatives. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 331–354. [URL]
Romero, Maribel & Han, Chung – hye
2004On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 609–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A.
2003 No and Tampoco: A pragmatic distinction in Spanish negation. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 999–1030. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005The pragmatics of negation in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 115: 1427–1456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Fine-tuning Jespersen’s cycle. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn [Studies in Language Companion Series 80], Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario
2014The pragmaticalization of ‘already’ in Romance: From discourse grammar to illocution. In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance languages, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 190–210. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline
2009From ‘textual’ to ‘interpersonal’: On the diachrony of the Italian particle mica . Journal of Pragmatics 41: 937–950. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2001Modal particles and their functional equivalents: A speech-act-theoretical approach. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1391–1417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997Negation and Clausal Structure. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul
2000The characterization of exclamative clauses in Paduan. Language 76: 123–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79: 39–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 53 other publications

Beaver, David & Kristin Denlinger
2020. Negation and Presupposition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Christoph J. Völter
2020. Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
Breitbarth, Anne
2020. The Negative Cycle and Beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 530 ff. DOI logo
Cerruti, Massimo
2020. Chapter 6. From dialect to standard: Facilitating and constraining factors. In Intermediate Language Varieties [Studies in Language Variation, 24],  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj
2020. The Neurology of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 725 ff. DOI logo
De Clercq, Karen
2020. Types of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
de Swart, Henriëtte
2020. Double Negation Readings. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Delfitto, Denis
2020. Expletive Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Delfitto, Denis, Chiara Melloni & Maria Vender
2019. The (en)rich(ed) meaning of expletive negation. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 1:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Dwivedi, Veena D.
2020. Individual Differences in Processing of Negative Operators. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 713 ff. DOI logo
Viviane Déprez & M. Teresa Espinal
2020. The Oxford Handbook of Negation, DOI logo
Fleisher, Nicholas
2020. Calculating the Scope of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Francis, Naomi & Sabine Iatridou
2020. Modals and Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Fălăuş, Anamaria
2020. Negation and Alternatives. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2020. Negative Concord and the Nature of Negative Concord Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 458 ff. DOI logo
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. The Morpho-Syntactic Nature of the Negative Marker. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. Evolution of Negative Dependencies. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 546 ff. DOI logo
Grodzinsky, Yosef, Virginia Jaichenco, Isabelle Deschamps, María Elina Sánchez, Martín Fuchs, Peter Pieperhoff, Yonatan Loewenstein & Katrin Amunts
2020. Negation and the Brain. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 694 ff. DOI logo
Guerini, Federica
2023. Negative structures in neo-standard Italian: non è che (‘it is not that’) + S and mica (‘a crumb’) in comparison. Sociolinguistica 37:1  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
2020. Cognitive Precursors of Negation in Preverbal Infants. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 589 ff. DOI logo
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Neg-raising. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Negation and Opposition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Joshi, Shrikant
2020. Affixal Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Kaup, Barbara & Carolin Dudschig
2020. Understanding Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 635 ff. DOI logo
Larrivée, Pierre
2019. Chapter 6. Historical pragmatics, explicit activation and wh in situ in French. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 15],  pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Larrivée, Pierre
2020. Sémantique de la grammaire, parcours typologiques et changement historique. Semiotica 2020:234  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Larrivée, Pierre
2020. The Role of Pragmatics in Negation Change. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Larrivée, Pierre & Alda Mari
2022. Interpreting high negation in Negative Interrogatives: the role of the Other. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s2  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Martins, Ana Maria
2020. Metalinguistic Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Mayr, Clemens
2020. Intervention Effects with Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Moeschler, Jacques
2020. Negative Predicates. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Muller, Hanna & Colin Phillips
2020. Negative Polarity Illusions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 656 ff. DOI logo
Papeo, Liuba & Manuel de Vega
2020. The Neurobiology of Lexical and Sentential Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 740 ff. DOI logo
Pearce, Elizabeth
2020. Negation and Constituent Ordering. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Poletto, Cecilia
2020. The Possible Positioning of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Prieto, Pilar & M. Teresa Espinal
2020. Negation, Prosody, and Gesture. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
Quer, Josep
2020. The Expression of Negation in Sign Languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Remberger, Eva-Maria
2020. Chapter 2. Information-structural properties of is that clauses. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213],  pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Ripley, David
2020. Denial. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Romero, Maribel
2020. Form and Function of Negative, Tag, and Rhetorical Questions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Schein, Barry
2020. Negation in Event Semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez, Liliana & Jennifer Austin
2020. Negation in L2 Acquisition and Beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 615 ff. DOI logo
Thornton, Rosalind
2020. Negation and First Language Acquisition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Tortora, Christina & Frances Blanchette
2020. Negation in Non-Standard Varieties. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Tovena, Lucia M.
2020. Negative Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Tubau, Susagna
2020. Minimizers and Maximizers as Different Types of Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
van der Auwera, Johan & Olga Krasnoukhova
2020. The Typology of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Wallage, Phillip
2020. Quantitative Studies of the Use of Negative (Dependent) Expressions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Weir, Andrew
2020. Negative Fragment Answers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 441 ff. DOI logo
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2020. Negative Quantifiers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 426 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Copyright Page. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Introduction. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Abbreviations. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation,  pp. xi ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.