Cover not available
Part of
Discourse-Pragmatic Variation in Context: Eight hundred years of LIKE
Alexandra D'Arcy
[Studies in Language Companion Series 187] 2017
► pp. 177–200

References

Abbott, Barbara
2006 Definite and indefinite. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 392–399. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abney, Steven Paul
1987 The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Adger, David
2003 Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1988 ‘Now may we have a word on this’: The use of ‘now’ as a discourse particle. In Corpus Linguistics, Hard and Soft: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Merja Kytö, Ossi Ihalainen & Matti Rissanen (eds), 15–34. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1997  I think – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Aitchison, Jean
1981 Language Change: Progress or Decay? London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
1999 On the Syntax of Nominalization and Possession: Remarks on Patterns of Ergativity. PhD dissertation, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Stavrou, Melita
1998 (A)symmetries in DPs and clauses: Evidence from derived nominals. The Linguistic Review 15(2): 257–276.Google Scholar
Algeo, John
1988 British and American grammatical differences. International Journal of Lexicography 1(1): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L.
1986 Reconsidering the history of like . Journal of Linguistics 22(2): 375–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allerton, David John & Cruttenden, Alan
1974 English sentence adverbials: Their syntax and their intonation in British English. Lingua 34: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1987 Prosodic Patterns in Spoken English. Studies in the Correlation Between Prosody and Grammar for Text-to-Speech Conversion. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
1990 Spoken English and the dictionary. In The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research, Jan Svartvik (ed.), 193–211. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Altmann, Gabriel H., von Buttar, Haro, Rott, Walter & Strauss, Udo
1983 A law of change in language. In Historical Linguistics, Barron Brainerd (ed.), 104–115. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P.
2010 An Introduction to Irish English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2012 A corpus-based approach to contemporary Irish writing: Ross O’Carroll-Kelly’s use of like as a discourse marker. International Journal of English Studies 12(2): 19–38.Google Scholar
To appear. Orality in Written Texts: Using Historical Corpora to Investigate Irish English, 1700–1900. London: Routledge.
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P. & McCafferty, Kevin
2015 ‘Sure this is a great country for drink and rowing at elections’: Discourse markers in the Corpus of Irish English Correspondence, 1750–1940. In Amador-Moreno et al. (eds), 270–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P., McCafferty, Kevin & Vaughan, Elain
(eds) 2015 Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 258]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
1997 ‘They gave us these yeah, and they like wanna see like how we talk and all that’: The use of ‘like’ and other discourse markers in London teenage speech. In Ungdomsspråk i Norden, Ulla-Brit Kostinas, Anna-Brita Stenström & Anna-Malin Karlsson (eds), 83–95. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet, Institutionene für nordiska språk.Google Scholar
1998 The pragmatic marker like from a relevance-theoretic perspective. In Jucker & Ziv (eds), 147–170.Google Scholar
2000 The role of pragmatic marker like in utterance interpretation. In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 79], Gisle Andersen & Thorstein Fretheim (eds), 17–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 84]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Wendy
2008 Corpus linguistics in the UK: Resources for sociolinguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(2): 352–371.Google Scholar
Archive of Ontario
1987 Farm Work and Farm Life in Ontario Since 1890 Oral History Project. Ontario Government Record Series RG 16–200.Google Scholar
Arnon, Inbal & Snider, Neal
2010 More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 63: 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asghar, Rob
2013 How I, like, conquered saying ‘like’. Forbes. [URL]> ([URL]).
Baghdikian, Sonia
1977  To say and to tell in present-day British English. Studia Neophilologica 49(1): 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Charles J. N.
1973 Variation and Linguistic Theory. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul
2010 Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Barth, Dagmar & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2002 On the development of final though: A case of grammaticalization? In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 345–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Joanne
2013  Oh I just talk normal like: A corpus-based, longitudinal study of constituent-final like in Tyneside English. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 19(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2002 Inferring variation and change from public corpora. In Chambers et al. (eds), 97–114.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, & Trudgill, Peter
(eds) 1998 Language Myths. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Becker, Misha
2004 Is isn’t be. Lingua 114(4): 399–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckner, Clay & Bybee, Joan
2009 A usage-based account of constituency and reanalysis. Language Learning 59(1): 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P. & Moisl, Hermann L.
(eds) 2007a Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Vol. 1: Synchronic Databases. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
(eds) 2007b Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Vol. 2: Diachronic Databases. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Berglund, Eva, Eriksson, Mårten & Westerlund, Monica
2005 Communicative skills in relation to gender, birth order, childcare and socioeconomic status in 18-month-old children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 46(6): 485–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Judy
2001 The DP hypothesis: Indentifying clausal properties in the nominal domain. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 536–561. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, July
2008 Reformulating the determiner phrase analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(6): 1246–1270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria & Hale, Kenneth
1996 The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27(1): 1–68.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1988 ‘So’ as a constraint on relevance. In Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality, Ruth M. Kempson (ed.), 183–195. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Blese, Dorthe, Vach, Werner, Slott, Marlene, Wehberg, Sonja, Thomsen, Pia, Madsen, Thomas O. & Basbøll, Hans
2008 The Danish Communicative Developmental Inventory: Validity and main developmental trends. Journal of Child Language 35(3): 651–669.Google Scholar
Blyth Carl Jr., Recktenwald, Sigrid & Wang, Jenny
1990  I’m like, ‘Say what?!’ A new quotative in American oral narrative. American Speech 65(3): 215–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boberg, Charles
2004 Real and apparent time in language change: Late adoption of changes in Montreal English. American Speech 79(3): 250–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bod, Rens
2001 Sentence memory: The storage vs. computation of frequent sentences. In Proceedings CUNY-2001 Conference on Sentence Processing, Philadelphia PA.Google Scholar
Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie
(eds) 2003 Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bornstein, Marc H., Hahn, Chun-Shin & Haynes, Maurice O.
2004 Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations. First Language 24(3): 267–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boskovic, Zeljko
1994 Categorial status of null operator relatives and finite declarative complements. Language Research 30: 387–417.Google Scholar
Boyland, Joyce Tang
1996 Morphosyntactic Change in Progress: A Psycholinguistic Approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Ford, Marilyn
2010 Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1): 186–213.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Processes underlying the development of pragmatic markers: The case of ‘(I) say’. In Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 134], Janne Skaffari, Matti Peikola, Ruth Carroll, Risto Hiltunen & Brita Wårvik (eds), 279–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Pathways in the development of pragmatic markers in English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 307–334. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brook, Marisa
2014 Comparative complementizers in Canadian English: Insights from Early Fiction. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(2): Article 2. [URL] (30 June 2015).
Brook, Marisa A.
2016 Syntactic Categories Informing Variationist Analysis: The Case of English Copy-Raising. PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary
2010 White Kids: Language, Race and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2006a Diagnostics of age-graded linguistic behaviour: The case of the quotative system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(1): 3–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b Social stereotypes, personality traits and regional perception displaced: Attitudes towards the ‘new’ quotatives in the U.K. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(3): 362–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The localization of global linguistic variants. English World-Wide 29(1): 15–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2006  The lady was al demonyak: Historical aspects of adverb all . English Language and Linguistics 10(2): 345–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, Rickford, John R., Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Wasow, Tom & Zwicky, Arnold
2010 The sociolinguistics of a short-lived innovation: Tracing the development of quotative all across spoken and Internet newsgroup data. Language Variation and Change 22(2):191–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & van Alphen, Ingrid
2012 Preface: Introductory remarks and new and old quotatives. In Buchstaller & van Alphen (eds), xi–xxx.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012 Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian Syntax: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butters, Ronald R.
1982 Editor’s note [on ‘be + like’]. American Speech 57(2): 149.Google Scholar
Buttny, Richard
1998 Putting prior talk into context: Reported speech and the reported context. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(1): 45–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2001 Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14(3): 261–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Mechanism of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 602–623.Google Scholar
2006 From usage to grammar: The minds response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Paul Hopper
(eds) 2001 Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
1995 Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
2011 The sociolinguistic variant as the carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22(3): 423–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 The implicit association test and sociolinguistic meaning. Lingua 122(7): 753–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caxaj-Ruiz, Paul & Kaminskaïa, Svetlana
2014 Compétences discursives de locuteurs du français L1 et L2 en contexte minoritaire. Revue de Nouvel-Ontario 39: 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CED
. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 2006 Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1984 How people use adverbial clauses. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Claudia Brugman & Monica Macaulay (eds), 437–449. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K.
2000 Region and language variation. English World-Wide 21(2): 169–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling-Estes, Natalie
(eds) 2002 The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chapman, Robert
1986 New Dictionary of American Slang. New York NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny
2007 Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2): 155–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Sue & Torgersen, Eivind
2011 Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2): 151–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114(6):683–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970 Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
1971 Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology, Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds), 183–217. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Gerrig, Roland J.
1990 Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66(4): 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
2016 Women, Men and Language, 3rd edn. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, Daniel E.
2001 Reanimated Voices: Speech Reporting in a Historical-Pragmatic Perspective [Pragmatics & Beyond 85]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coopmans, Peter
1989 Where stylistic and syntactic processes meet: Locative inversion in English. Language 65(4): 728–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, Karen P.
2010 Irish English, Vol. 1: Northern Ireland. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, Karen P., Buchstaller, Isablle, Mearns, Adam & Moisl, Hermann
2010–2012 A linguistic ‘time capsule’ for the ‘Google Generation’: The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English. Research Grant. Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). #AH/H037691/1.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Karen P., Buchstaller, Isabelle, Mearns, Adam & Moisl, Hermann
2012 The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English. [URL]
Coupland, Nikolas
2014 Sociolinguistic change, vernacularization, and British broadcast media. In Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change, Jannis Androutsopoulos (ed.), 67–96. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Christophersen, Paul
1939 The Articles: A Study of their Theory and Use in English. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
1997 Towards a corpus of dialogues, 1550–1750. In Language in Time and Space. Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Viereck on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik – Beihefte, Heft 97), Heinrich Ramisch & Kenneth Wynne (eds), 60–73. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
2000 Data in historical pragmatics: Spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(2): 175–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Curme, George O.
1931 A Grammar of the English Language, Vol. 3: Syntax. Boston MA: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer
2000 The sociolinguistic distribution of and attitudes toward focuser like and quotative like . Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(1): 60–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alex
2004 Contextualizing St. John’s youth English within the Canadian quotative system. Journal of English Linguistics 32(4): 323–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005a The development of linguistic constraints: Phonological innovations in St. John’s English. Language Variation and Change 17(3): 327–355.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
2005b  Like: Syntax and Development. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
2006 Lexical replacement and the like(s). American Speech 81(4): 339–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007  Like and language ideology: Disentangling fact from fiction. American Speech 82(4): 386–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Canadian English as a window to the rise of like in discourse. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies 19(2): 125–140.Google Scholar
2011–2014 Victoria English: Its development and current state. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410–2011–0219.Google Scholar
2012 The diachrony of quotation: Evidence from New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 24(3): 343–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Discourse. In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 410–422. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015a Quotation and advances in understanding syntactic systems. Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 3–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b Stability, stasis and change: The longue durée of intensification. Diachronica 32(4): 449–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015c Variation, transmission, incrementation. In The Handbook of Historical Phonology, Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds), 583–602. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. [URL]
2010 The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 25(4): 447–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010– The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. [URL]
2012 Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million-word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora 7(2): 121–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denis, Derek
2015 The Development of Pragmatic Markers in Canadian English. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
2016 Oral histories as a window to linguistic history and language history: Exploring earlier Ontario English with the Farm Work and Farm Life Since 1890 Oral History Collection. Audio feature. American Speech 91(4): 513–516. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Denis, Derek & Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2016 Innovation, right? Change, you know? Utterance final tags in Canadian English. In Pichler (ed.), 86–112.Google Scholar
de Klerk, Vivian
2006 Codeswitching, borrowing and mixing in a corpus of Xhosa English. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9(5): 597–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas
1840–1841 Style. Blackwood’s Magazine. Repr. in De Quincey’s Works, Vol. 10: Style and Rhetoric and Other Essays, 158–292. Edinburgh: Black.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. J.
2000 Like it or not, ‘like’ is probably here to stay. Los Angeles Times. August 21: 2.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabrielle
2011 Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2): 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth
1980 Variation in discourse ‘and stuff like that’. Language in Society 9(1): 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinkin, Aaron
2016 Variant-centered variation and the Like Conspiracy. Linguistic Variation 16(2): 221–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diskin, Chloe
2013 Integration and identity: Acquisition of Irish-English by Polish and Chinese migrants in Dublin, Ireland. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 19(1): 67–89.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette
2015 Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2): 241–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie
2011 Sociophonetic variation and the lemma. Journal of Phonetics 39(4): 694–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Linguistic Variation, Identity Construction and Cognition. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Constructing style: Phonetic variation in discursive functions of like . In Pichler (ed.), 232–251.Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie
1992 Extension particles, etc. Language Variation and Change 4(2): 179–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie & Horvath, Barbara
1999 When the music changes, you change too: Gender and language change in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 11(3): 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie & Sankoff, David
2001 The variationist approach toward discourse structural effects and socio-interactional dynamics. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds), 252–303. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Durham, Mercedes, Haddican, Bill, Zweig, Eytan, Johnson, Daniel E., Baker, Zipporah, Cockeram, David, Danks, Esther & Tyler, Louise
2012 Constant linguistic effects in the diffusion of be like . Journal of English Linguistics 40(4): 316–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
1989 The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1(3): 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2003 Language and Gender. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Amy-Mae
2015 5 steps for, like, literally cutting the word ‘like’ out of your life. Mashable. [URL] (29 January 2016).
Ellis, Nick C.
1996 Sequencing in SLA. Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 91–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning 48(4): 631–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elsness, Johan
1997 The Perfect and the Preterite in Contemporary and Earlier English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt
1987 Pragmatic Expression in English: A Study of ‘you know’, ‘you see’ and ‘I mean’ in Face-to-Face Conversation. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
2001 Pragmatic markers revisitied with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk. Journal of Pragmatics 33(9): 1337–1359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt
1993 Pragmaticalization: The case of ba and you know . Studier i modern språkvetenskap [Acta Universitatis Stockhomiensis New series 10, 76–93. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Erman, Britt & Warren, Beatrice
2000 The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text & Talk 20(1): 29–62.Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, Itamar
1982 The emergence of speech organizers in a renovated language: The case of Hebrew void pragmatic connectives. In Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, N. E. Enkvist (ed.), 179–193. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
Feldman, Heidi M., Dollaghan, Christine A., Campbell, Thomas F., Kurs-Lasky, Marcia, Janosky, Janine E. & Paradise, Jack L.
2000 Measurement properties of the MacArthur communicative development inventories at ages one and two years. Child Development 71(2): 310–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenson, Larry, Dale, Philip S., Reznick, J. Steven, Bates, Elizabeth, Thal, Donna J. & Pethick, Stephen J.
1994 Variability in early communicative development. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development 59(5): 1–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen & Bell, Barbara
1995 Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of be + like. American Speech 70(3): 265–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fidelholtz, James
1975 Word frequency and vowel reduction in English. Chicago Linguistics Society 11: 200–213.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga C. M. & van der Leek, Frederike C.
1983 The demise of the Old English impersonal construction. Journal of Linguistics 19(2): 337–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne
1999 Pragmatic markers in comparative and historical perspective: Theoretical implications of a case study. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada.
Follett, Wilson
1966 Modern American Usage. A Guide. New York NY: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Foster, Brian
1970 The Changing English Language. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerard & Watt, Dominic
1999 Tracking the emergence of structured variation: Realisations of (t) by Newcastle children. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 1–23.Google Scholar
2005 Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81(1): 177–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Robles, Jessica
2010 It’s like mmm: Enactments with it’s like . Discourse Studies 12(6): 715–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E.
2007 Folk notions of um and uh, you know and like. Text & Talk 27(3): 297–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006 A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 359–374. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1988 Types of English discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38(1): 19–33.Google Scholar
1990 An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14(3): 383–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2): 167–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Janet
2003a Discourse marker use across speech contexts: A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance. Multilingua 22(2): 185–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics 35(1): 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003c Use of the discourse marker like in interviews. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3): 365–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
1993 The Rise of Functional Categories [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998  For to in the history of English. American Journal of Germanic Language and Literature 10(1): 45–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Gries, Stefan T.
2009 Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1975 Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo. In Word Order and Word Order Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 47–112. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea
2012 Impersonal quotation and hypothetical discourse. In Buchstaller & van Alphen (eds), 3–36.Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis
1985 Framing the linguistic action scene in Old and Present-day English: OE cweþan, secgan, sprecan and Present-day English speak, talk, say and tell compared. In Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 34], Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 149–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Campbell, Lyle, Hay, Jennifer, Maclagan, Margaret, Sudbury, Andrea & Trudgill, Peter
2004 New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Hay, Jennifer & Maclagan, Margaret
2007 The ONZE Corpus. In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Vol. 2: Diachronic Databases. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, William & Dixon, James Main
1921 Manual of Modern Scots. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney
1992 A new corpus of English: ICE. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991, Jan Svartvik (ed.), 171–183. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1996 Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne & Mutz, Katrin
2004 Grammaticalization vs. pragmaticalization? The development of pragmatic markers in German and Italian. In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gup, Ted
2012 Diss ‘like’. The Chronicle of Higher Education. [URL] (29 January 2016).
Guy, Greg
1988 Advanced VARBRUL analysis. In Linguistic Change and Contact, Kathleen Ferrara, Becky Brown, Keith Walters & John Baugh (eds), 124–136. Austin TX: University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Haddican, William & Zweig, Eytan
2012 The syntax of manner quotative constructions in English and Dutch. Linguistic Variation 12(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2014 West-Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the Speech ‘act layer. Studia Linguistica 68(1): 116–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, & Hill, Virginia
2013 The syntactization of discourse. In Syntax and its Limits, Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds), 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1994 Ritualization and the development of language. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel Jay
1993 On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002 Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1967 Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2014 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-Hye
2000 The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf
1998 Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon: Nominalizations, vocabulary items and the encyclopedia. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32: 119–137.Google Scholar
Harris, John
1993 The grammar of Irish English. In Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles, James Milroy & Leslie Milroy (eds), 139–186. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hasting County Historical Society
1975 Belleville Oral History Archive. Opportunities for Youth 1975. City of Belleville, Ontario.Google Scholar
Hasund, Ingrid Kristine
2003 The Discourse Markers like in English and liksom in Norwegian Teenage Language: A Corpus-based, Cross-linguistic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen and Agder University College.Google Scholar
Hedevind, Bertil
1967 The Dialect of Dentdale in the West Riding of Yorkshire [Societas Anglistica Upsaliensis 5]. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene
1982 The Semantics and Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
1983 File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness. In Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 164–189. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Johannes, Keupdjio, Hermann, Lam, Zoe Wai-Man, Osa-Gómez, Adriana & Wiltschko, Martina
2014 How to do things with particles. Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. [URL] (12 May 2016).
Heine, Bernd
2003 Grammaticalization. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 575–601.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechtild
1984 Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison, Maclaren, Rose, Wilson, John & Finlay, Cathy
1997 The acquisition of negative concord in non-standard English. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Elizabeth Hughes, Mary Hughes & Annabel Greenhill (eds), 269–280. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hesson, Ashley & Shellgren, Madeline
2015 Discourse marker like in real time: Characterizing the time-course of sociolinguistic impression making. American Speech 90(2): 154–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herlyn, Anne
1999 So he says to her, he says, ‘Well,’ he says…: multiple dialogue introducers from a historical perspective. In Historical Dialogue Analysis [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 66], Andreas H. Jucker, Gerd Fritz & Franz Lebsanft (eds), 313–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
2007 Irish English. History and Present-day Forms. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Virginia
2013 Vocatives: How Syntax Meets with Pragmatics. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986 Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun
1984 Transitivity: Grammatical Relations in Government-Binding Theory. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun & Mulder, René
1990 Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication. The Linguistic Review 7: 1–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hölker, Klaus
1991 Fransösisch: Partikelforschung. In Lexikon der romantischen Linguistik, Vol. 5: Französisch, Okzitanisch, Katatanisch, Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt (eds), 77–88. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan
1976 Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morpho-phonological change. In Current Progress in Historical Linguistics, William M. Christie (ed.), 95–105. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence
1980 Affixation and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Papers from the 16th Regional Meeting of the CLS, Jody Kreiman & Almerindo Ojeda (eds), 134–146. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Horne, Merle, Hansson, Petra, Bruce, Gösta, Frid, Johan & Filipsson, Marcus
2001 Cue words and the topic structure of spoken discourse: The case of Swedish ‘men’ ‘but’. Journal of Pragmatics 33(7): 1061–1081. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Magnus
2007 The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674–1834: Evaluating and annotating a corpus of 18th and 19th-century spoken English. In Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1: Annotating Variation and Change, Anneli Meurman-Solin & Arja Nurmi (eds). [URL] (19 July 2016).
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logo
Hyman, Larry
2001 The limits of phonetic determinism in phonology. *NC revisited. In The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology, Elizabeth Hume & Keith Johnson (eds), 141–185. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Iyeiri, Yoko, Yaguchi, Michiko & Okabe, Hiroko
2005 Gender and style: The discourse particle like in the Corpus of Spoken Professional American English. English Corpus Studies 12: 37–51.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002 Foundations of Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1927 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part 3: Syntax. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
1942 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part 6: Morphology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
John, Oliver P., Naumann, Laura P. & Soto, Christopher J.
2008 Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3rd edn, Oliver P. John, Richard W. Robins & Lawrence A. Pervin, Lawrence A. (eds), 114–158. New York NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Jones-Sargent, Val
1983 Tyne Bytes. A Computerised Sociolinguistic Study of Tyneside. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Anette M. & Stenström, Anna-Brita
2009 Dos marcadores pragmáticos contrastados en el lenguaje juvenil: el inglés like y el español como. Español Actual 92: 103–121.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. & Janda, Richard D.
2003 On language, change, and language change – or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 3–180.Google Scholar
(eds) 2003 The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
1993 The discourse marker well: A relevance theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19(5): 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Smith, Sara W.
1998 And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In Jucker & Ziv (eds), 171–201.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas & Ziv, Jael
(eds) 1998 Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Smith, Sara W. & Lüdge, Tanja
2003 Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35(12): 1737–1769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2013 The development of comment clauses. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 286–317. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L.
2013 Irish English, Vol. 2. The Republic of Ireland. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Abby
2016 Women Talk More than Men, and Other Myths about Language Explained. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2003 Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Interactional Functions, With a Focus on ‘I Think’ [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 115]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kastronic, Laura
2011 Discourse like in Quebec English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17(2): Article 13. [URL]
Keller, Eric
1979 Gambits: Conversation strategy signals. Journal of Pragmatics 3(3–4): 219–238.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler
2011 Corpora from a sociolinguistic perspective. In Corpus Studies: Future Directions, Stefan T. Gries (ed.). Special Issue of Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2): 361–389.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler & Van Herk, Gerard
(eds) 2011 Corpus linguistics and sociolinguistic inquiry. Special issue of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul
1996 Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8(2): 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995 Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds), 140–169. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Schneider, Edgar W. In collaboration with Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend, & Upton, Clive
2004 A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology; Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin
(eds) 2013 The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (30 June 2016).
Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt
1994 Ungdomsspråk. Uppsala: Hallgren & Fallgren.Google Scholar
Kovac, Ceil & Adamson, Hugh Douglas
1981 Variation theory and first language acquisition. In Variation Omnibus, David Sankoff & Herietta Cedergren (eds), 403–410. Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A., Anderson, Jean, Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P., Opas-Hänninen, Lena & Plichta, Bartlomiej
2006 Collaboration on corpora for regional and social analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 34(3): 172–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S.
1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann
2000 The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, second edition, release 4. [URL]
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren
2004 The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition, release 3. [URL]
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel
2016 The Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English (PPCMBE2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, second edition, release 1. [URL]
Kytö, Merja & Walker, Terry
2006 Guide to A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. [Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 130]. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
1982 Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society 11(2): 165–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2(2): 205–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007 Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2): 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 How did it happen? The new verb of quotation in Philadelphia. Presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 45, Simon Fraser University and University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej & Nagy, Naomi
2011 Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4): 431–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William & Waletzky, Joshua
1997 Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1): 3–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973 Questionable answers and answerable questions. In Papers in Honor of Henry and Renee Kahane, B. Kachru (ed.), 453–467. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Laserna, Charlyn M., Seih, Yi-Tai & Pennebaker, James W.
2014  Um…who like says you know: Filler word use as a function of age, gender and personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33(3): 328–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger
1997 Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauwereyns, Shizuka
2002 Hedges in Japanese conversation: The influence of age, sex, and formality. Language Variation and Change 14(2): 239–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz R.
1978 Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7(2): 171–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1974 Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995[1982] Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch. 2nd edn. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne
1989 Remembering and representing prose: Quoted speech as a data source. Discourse Processes 12(1):105–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehti-Eklund, Hanna
1990 Från adverb till markör i text: Studier i semantisk-syntatisk utveckling i äldre svenska. Helsingfors: Svenska litteratursällskapet.Google Scholar
Levey, Stephen
2003  He’s like ‘Do it now!’ and I’m like ‘No!’: Some innovative quotative usage among young people in London. English Today 19(1): 24–32.Google Scholar
2006 The sociolinguistic distribution of discourse marker like in preadolescent speech. Multilingua 25(4): 413–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 The role of children in the propagation of discourse-pragmatic change: insights from the acquisition of quotative variation. In Pichler (ed.), 160–182.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport, Malka
1986 The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4): 623–661.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity. At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez & Fox, Sue
2014 Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of English Linguistics 42(3): 185–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Diana M.
2011 A discourse-constructional approach to the emergence of discourse markers in English. Linguistics 49(2): 415–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N.
1986 Direct and indirect speech: A functional study. In Direct and Indirect Speech, Florian Coulmas (ed.), 29–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liao, Silvie
2009 Variation in the use of discourse markers by Chinese teaching assistants in the US. Journal of Pragmatics 41(7): 1313–1328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark
2009 “At the end of the day” not management speak. Language Log. [URL] (29 April 2017).
2016  Like youth and sex. Language Log . [URL] (11 April 2016).
Lightfoot, David W.
1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1981 The history of Noun Phrase movement. In The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition, C. L. Baker & John J. McCarthy (eds), 86–119. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Binmei
2016 Effect of L2 exposure: From a perspective of discourse markers. Applied Linguistic Review 7(1): 73–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Kris & Fox Tree, Jean E.
2012 Hedges enhance memory but inhibit retelling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 19(5): 892–898. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Méndez-Naya, Belén
2012 On the use of as if, as though, and like in Present-Day English complementation structures. Journal of English Linguistics 40(2): 172–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 From clause to pragmatic marker: a study of the development of like-parentheticals in American English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1): 36–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macafee, Caroline
(ed.) 1996 Concise Ulster Dictionary. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald
2001 You’re like ‘why not?’: The quotative expression of Glasgow adolescents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Discourse variation. In Chambers et al. (eds), 283–306.Google Scholar
2005 Talk That Counts. Age, Gender and Social Class Differences in Discourse. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Maddeaux, Ruth & Dinkin, Aaron J.
2017 Is like like like? Evaluating the same variant across multiple variables. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1). Online. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maegaard, Marie
2010 Linguistic practice and stereotypes among Copenhagen adolescents. In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices, Pia Quist & Bente A. Svendsen (eds), 189–206. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian & Leech, Geoffrey
2006 Current changes in English syntax. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 318–342. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael
2001a On the grammaticalization of of ke’ilu ‘like’ in Hebrew talk-in-interaction. Language in Society 31(2): 243–276.Google Scholar
2001b  Veke’ilu haragláyim sh’xa nitka’ot bifním kaze (‘and like your feet get stuck inside like’): Hebrew kaze (‘like’), ke’ilu (‘like’), and the decline of Israeli dugri (‘direct’) speech. Discourse Studies 3(3): 295–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo
1988 From bound grammatical markers to free discourse markers: History of some Japanese connectives. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds), 340–351. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2004  They’re a little bit different…: observations on hedges in academic talk. In Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 120], Karin Aijmer & Anna-Britta Stenström (eds), 173–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin & Amador-Moreno, Carolina P.
In preparation. CORIECOR. The Corpus of Irish English Correspondence. Bergen & Cáceres: University of Bergen and University of Extremadura.
Meehan, Theresa
1991 It’s like, ‘What’s happening in the evolution of like?’: A theory of grammaticalization. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 37–51.Google Scholar
Megerdoomian, Karine
2008 Parallel nominal and verbal projections. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizaretta (eds), 73–103. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1948 [1912] Linguistique Historique et Linguistique Générale. Paris: Édouard Champion.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2003 On intensifiers and grammaticalization: The case of swiÞe . English Studies 84(4): 372–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2002 All the same? The emergence of complementizers in Bislama. In Reported Discourse: A Meeting Ground for Different Linguistic Domains [Typological Studies in Language 52], Tom Güldemann & Manfred von Roncador (eds), 341–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam & Niedzielski, Nancy
1998 The syntax and semantics of olsem in Bislama. In Recent Papers in Austronesian Linguistics, Matthew Pearson (ed.), UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20(1): 235–243.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Niedzielski, Nancy
2003 The globalisation of vernacular variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4): 534–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim
2009  Like and other discourse markers. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds), 317–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina
1995 The function of like in dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 23(4): 365–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Karen
2013 Acquisition of variable rules: /s/-lenition in the speech of Chilean Spanish-speaking children and their caregivers. Language Variation and Change 25(3): 311–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Karen & Schmitt, Cristina
2010 Effects of variable input in the acquisition of plural in two dialects of Spanish. Lingua 120(5): 1178–1193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
2004 Language ideologies and linguistic change. In Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, Carmen Fought (ed.), 161–177. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley, Milroy, James, Docherty, Gerry, Foulkes, Paul & Walshaw, David
1999 Phonological variation and change in contemporary English: Evidence from Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Derby. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 8: 35–46.Google Scholar
Moore, Collette
2002 Reporting direct speech in Early Modern slander depositions. In Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective, Donka Minkova & Robert P. Stockwell (eds), 339–416. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Moreno Ayora, Antonio
1991 Sintaxis y Semántica de ‘como’. Málaga: España Librería Agora.Google Scholar
Munn, Alan Boag
1993 Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
1999 First conjunct agreement: Against a clausal analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 4(1): 643–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nestor, Niamh
2013 The positional distribution of discourse like: a case study of young poles in Ireland. In Linguistic and Cultural Acquisition in a Migrant Community, David Singleton, Vera Regan & Ewelina Debaene (eds), 49–72. Bristol: Mutlilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nestor, Niamh, Ní Chasaide, Caitríona & Regan, Vera
2012 Discourse like and identity poles in Ireland. In New Perspectives on Irish English [Varieties of English around the World G44], Bettina Migge & Máire Ní Chiosáin (eds), 327–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nestor, Niamh & Regan, Vera
2015 The significance of age and place of residence in the positional distribution of discourse like in L2 speech. In Amador-Moreno et al. (eds), 408–432.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
2003 Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Rissanen, Matti
2002 Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24. 359–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2007 Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2): 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ocampo, Francisco
2006 Movement towards discourse is not grammaticalization: The evolution of claro from adjective to discourse particle in spoken Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Nuria Sagarra & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds), 308–319. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Odato, Christopher V.
2010 Children’s Development of Knowledge and Beliefs about English Like(s). PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
2013 The development of children’s use of discourse like in peer interaction. American Speech 88(2): 117–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED2. The Oxford English Dictionary
1989 2nd edn. 20 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Old Bailey Proceedings Online
2015 version 7.2. [URL] (19 July 2016).
Onodera, Noriko
1995 Diachronic analysis of Japanese discourse markers. In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35], Andreas Jucker (ed.), 393–437. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onraët, Lauren A.
2011 English as a Lingua Franca and English in South Africa: Distinctions and Overlap. MA thesis, Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola
1982 The symbiotic relationship between pragmatic particles and impromptu speech. In Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, Nils Erik Enkvist (ed.), 147–177. Turku: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
2014 The role of pragmatic function in the grammaticalization of English general extenders. Pragmatics 24(1): 105–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann & Yule, George
1997 On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics 25(3): 250–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, Marion L.
1983 Apologies and Remedial Exchanges: A Study of Language Use in Social Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pascual, Esther
2006 Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17(2): 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1978 Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In BLS 4: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 157–189. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1982 Paths and Categories. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty
1980 Old English an ~ on: A new appraisal. Journal of English Linguistics 14: 20–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Heike
2010 Methods in discourse variation analysis: Reflections on the way forward. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(5): 581–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation [Studies in Language Variation 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2016 Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Heike & Levey, Stephen
2010 Variability in the co-occurrence of discourse features. University of Reading Language Studies Working Papers 2: 17–27.Google Scholar
2011 In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: General extenders in northeast England. English Language and Linguistics 15(3): 441–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinson, Mathilde
2009 Norme et variation en Anglais contemporain. Étude variationniste de quelques subordonnants: Complémentation de help et like conjonction. PhD dissertation, Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris III.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1991 Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1993 Verb seconding in Old English: Verb movement to Infl. The Linguistic Review 10(1): 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Cliticization in Old English. In Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena, Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 375–409. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1999 Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Clause Structure. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
2003 Variationist approaches to syntactic change. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 509–528.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Kroch, Anthony
1989 The rightward movement of complements and adjuncts in the Old English of Beowulf . Language Variation and Change 1(2): 115–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podlubny, Ryan G., Geeraert, Kristina & Tucker, Benjamin V.
2015 It’s all about, like, acoustics. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, August 2015 <[URL] (18 January 2016).
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–424.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana
1980 Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en espagÑol: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics 18(7–8): 581–618.Google Scholar
2011 A variationist perspective on grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 209–224. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2001 African American English in the Diaspora: Tense and Aspect. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981 On the inferencing of indefinite this NPs. In Elements of Discourse Understanding, Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber & Ivan A. Sag (eds), 231–250. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph
1972 The English Language and Images of Matter. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ramat, Anna Giacalone, Mauri, Caterina & Molinelli, Piera
(eds) 2013 Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
2006 Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 339–358. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette
1993 A word in time: First findings from the investigation of dynamic text. In English Language Corpora: Design, Analysis and Exploitation. Papers from the Thirteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Nijmegen 1992, Jan Aarts, Pieter de Haan & Nelleke Oostdijk (eds), 279–288. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R.
1975 Carrying the new wave into syntax: The case of Black English bin . In Analyzing Variation in Language, Ralph W. Fasold & Roger W. Shuy (eds), 162–183. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1998  Have/be raising, move F, and procrastinate. Linguistic Inquiry 29(1): 113–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2003 Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julie
1997a Acquisition of variable rules: A study of (-t,d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 24(2): 351–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997b Hitting a moving target: acquisition of sound change by Philadelphia children. Language Variation and Change 9(2): 249–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Child language acquisition. In Chambers et al. (eds), 333–348.Google Scholar
2005 Acquisition of sociolinguistic variation. In Clinical Sociolinguistics, Martin Ball (ed.), 153–164. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julie & Labov, William
1995 Learning to talk Philadelphian: Acquisition of short a by preschool children. Language Variation and Change 7(1): 101–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, C. Clough
1876 A Glossary of Words Pertaining to the Dialect of Mid-Yorkshire: With Others Peculiare to Lower Nidderdale. Ludgate Hill: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Robinson, Philip
2007[1997] Ulster-Scots. A Grammar of the Traditional Written and Spoken Language, 2nd edn. Belfast: The Ullans Press.Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael & Culicover, Peter
1990 English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
2013 Quotatives down under: Be like in cross-generational Australian English speech. English World-Wide 34(1): 48–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Quotatives across time: West Australian English then and now. In Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights, Heike Pichler (ed.), 139–159. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeder, Rebecca, Onosson, Sky & D’Arcy, Alexandra
2017 Joining the western region: Sociophonetic shift in Victoria. Ms, University of North Carolina at Charlotte and University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
2008 Corpus linguistics and sociolinguistics. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 96–111. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne & Lange, Deborah
1991 The use of ‘like’ as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66(3): 227–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooryck, Johan
2000 Configurations of Sentential Complementation: Perspectives from Romance Languages. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R. & Cooper, W. E.
1979 Like, syntax. In Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett, William E. Cooper & Edward C. T. Walker (eds), 343–418. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Russell, Brenda, Perkins, Jenna & Grinnell, Heather
2008 Interviewees’ overuse of the word like and hesitations: Effects in simulated hiring decisions. Psychological Reports 102(1): 111–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Said-Mohand, Aixa
2008 Aproximación sociolingüística al uso del marcador del discurso como en el habla de jóvenes bilingües en la Florida. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 2(12): 71–93.Google Scholar
Sams, Jessie
2010 Quoting the unspoken: An analysis of quotations in spoken discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42(11): 3147–3160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian
1973 Above and beyond phonology in variable rules. In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds), 44–62. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Blondeau, Hélène
2007 Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3): 560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, Thibault, Pierette, Nagy, Naomi, Blondeau, Hélène, Fonollosa, Marie-Odile & Gagnon, Lucie
1997 Variation in the use of discourse markers in a language contact situation. Language Variation and Change 9(2): 191–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice
1992 Variation and change in Yiddish subordinate clause word order. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10(4): 595–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 The rate of phrase structure change in the history of Yiddish. Language Variation and Change 5(3): 257–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Anaphoric then: Aspectual, textual, and epistemic meaning. Linguistics 30(4): 753–792. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleef, Erik & Turton, Danielle
2016 Sociophonetic variation of like in British dialects. Effects of function, contexts and predictability. English Language and Linguistics.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2002 Investigating variation and change in written documents. In Chambers et al. (eds), 67–96.Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence Clifford
1985 Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
1999 Discourse Markers. Lingua 107: 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schweinberger, Martin
2012 A variational approach towards discourse marker like in Irish-English. In New Perspectives on Irish English [Varieties of English around the World G44], Bettina Migge & Máire Ní Chiosáin (eds), 179–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 A sociolinguistic analysis of discourse marker like in Northern Ireland. A look behind the scenes at quantitative reasoning. In New Approaches to the Analysis of Linguistic Variability, Markus Bieswanger & Amei Koll-Stobbe (eds), 13–39. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015 The Discourse Marker like: A Corpus-based Analysis of Selected Varieties of English, 2nd revised version. PhD dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
Siegel, Muffy
2002  Like: The discourse particle and semantics. Journal of Semantics 19(1): 35–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter, Maier, Georg & Schweinberger, Martin
2009 Towards a more fine-grained analysis of the areal distributions of non-standard features of English. In Language Contacts Meet English Dialects: Studies in Honour of Markku Filppula, Esa Pentillä & Heli Paulasto, 19–46. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
1992 The automatic analysis of corpora. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm 1991, Jan Svartvik (ed.), 379–397. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singler, John V.
2001 Why you can’t do a VARBRUL study of quotatives and what such a study can show us. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 7(3): 257–278.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes, & Fortune, Liane
2007  Mam, ma trousers is fa’in doon! Community, caregiver, and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1): 63–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: caregivers, children, and t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change 21(1): 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy, & Tenny, Carol
2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. 1 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita, Andersen, Gisle, Hasund, Kristine, Monstad, Kristine & Aas, Hanne
1998 User’s Manual to Accompany the Bergen Corpus of London Teenage Language (COLT). Bergen: Department of English at the University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara
1968 The Tyneside Linguistic Survey. Zeitschrift fuer Mundartforschung, Neue Folge 4: 788–794.Google Scholar
Stubbe, Maria & Holmes, Janet
1995 ‘You know’, ‘eh’ and other “exasperating expressions”: An analysis of social and stylistic variation in the use of pragmatic devices in a sample of New Zealand English. Language and Communication 15(1): 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2017 Variationist sociolinguistics and corpus-based variationist linguistics: Overlap and cross-pollination potential. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62(4).Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
1996–1998 Roots of identity: Variation and grammaticalization in contemporary British English. Research Grant. Economic and Social Research Council of the United Kingdom (ESRC). #R00238287.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
1998  Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language Variation and Change 10(2): 153–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001  Come/came variation in English dialects. American Speech 76(1): 42–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001–2003 Back to the roots: The legacy of British dialects. Research Grant. Economic and Social Research Council of the United Kingdom (ESRC). #R00239097.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2003–2006 Linguistic changes in Canada entering the 21st century. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410–2003–0005.Google Scholar
2006  So cool, right? Canadian English entering the 21st century. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51(2–3): 309–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007–2010 Directions of change in Canadian English. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410–070–048.Google Scholar
2012 Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
2013 Roots of English: Exploring the History of Dialects. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2016a Antecedents of innovation: Exploring general extenders in conservative dialects. In Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights, Heike Pichler (ed.), 115–138. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b Teen Talk: The Language of Adolescents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alex
2004  He’s like, she’s like: The quotative system in Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(4): 493–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra
2007 Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 19(2): 199–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1): 58–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., D’Arcy, Alexandra, Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
2016 Outliers, impact, and rationalization in linguistic change. Language 92(4): 824–849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Denis, Derek
2014 Expanding the transmission/diffusion dichotomy: Evidence from Canada. Language 90(1): 90–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Hudson, Rachel
1999  Be like et al. beyond America: The quotative system in British and Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(2): 147–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Smith, Jennifer
2002 Either it isn’t or it’s not: neg/aux contraction in British dialects. English World-Wide 23(2): 251–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1986 Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narratives. In Direct and Indirect Speech, Florian Coulmas (ed.), 311–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann
1994 The change from SOV to SVO in Ancient Greek. Language Variation and Change 6(1): 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Walker, James A.
2009 On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: a variationist study of that . Linguistics 47(1): 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Collocations in grammaticalization and variation. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 225–238. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tracy, Marc
2013 Linguist says you can use ‘like’ more. He’s, like, wrong. New Republic. [URL] (29 January 2016).
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1982 From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24], Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 245–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997a The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper at Twelfth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, U.K. 1995. [URL] (11 April 2016).
1997b The discourse connective ‘after all’: A historical pragmatic account. Paper presented at the Sixteenth International Congress of Linguists, Paris.
2003 Constructions in grammaticalization. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 624–647.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, & Dasher, Richard B.
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd
(eds) 1991 Approaches to Grammaticalization, 2 Vols [Typological Studies in Language 19]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & König, Ekkehard
1991 The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott & Heine (eds), Vol. 1;189–218.Google Scholar
Truesdale, Sarah & Meyerhoff, Miriam
2015 Acquiring some like-ness to others: How some Polish teenagers acquire the Scottish pragmatics of like . Te Reo 58: 3–28.Google Scholar
Tummers, José, Heylen, Kris & Geeraerts, Dirk
2005 Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 225–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Underhill, Robert
1988 Like is like, Focus. American Speech 63(3): 234–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Underwood, Geoffrey, Schmitt, Norbert & Galpin, Adam
2004 The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In Formulaic Sequences [Language Learning & Language Teaching 9], Norbert Schmitt (ed.), 153–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valentine, Tamara M.
1991 Getting the message across: Discourse markers in Indian English. World Englishes 10(3): 325–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2009 Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive-Functional Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Quotative go and be like: grammar and grammaticalization. In Buchstaller & van Alphen (eds), 173–202.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven & Davidse, Kristen
2009 The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives: A constructional approach. Cognitive Linguistics 20(4): 777–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana
2012 Formulaic language and language disorders. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32(1): 62–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Diane
1986 Que fait la sociolinguistique avec l’analyse du discourse et vice-versa. Language et Société 38(1): 7–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 The sociolinguistics of exemplification in spoken French in Montreal. Language Variation and Change 4(2): 137–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Diane & Dubois, Sylvie
1996 A study of the use of reported speech in spoken language. In Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis, Jennifer Arnold, Renée Blake, Brad Davidson, Scott Schwenter & Julie Solomon (eds), 361–374. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Vincent, Diane & Sankoff, David
1992 Punctors: A pragmatic variable. Language Variation and Change 4(2): 205–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, F. T.
1970 An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part 1: Syntactical Units with One Verb, 2nd edn. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y.
1977 The Lexicon in Phonological Change. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watt, Dominic & Milroy, Lesley
1999 Patterns of variation and change in three Newcastle vowels: Is this dialect levelling? In Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, Paul Foulkes & Gerard Docherty (eds), 25–46. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Webster, Noah
1831 Rudiments of English Grammar; Being an Abridgement of the Improved Grammar of the English Language. New Haven CT: Durrie & Peck.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin I.
1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, W. P. Lehmann, & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 95–195. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wentworth, Harold & Flexner, Stuart Berg
1967 Dictionary of American Slang. London: George G. Harap & Co.Google Scholar
wikiHow
. no date. How to stop saying the word ‘like’: 10 steps. [URL]> (29 January 2016).
Wilson, Kenneth G.
1987 Van Winkle’s Return: Change in American English, 1966–1986. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2014 The Universal Structure of Categories. Toward a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina, Denis, Derek & D’Arcy, Alexandra
2017 Deconstructing variation in pragmatic function: A transdisciplinary case study. Ms, University of British Columbia and University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina & Heim, Johannes
2016 The syntax of confirmationals: A neo-performative analysis. In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 303–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse
2000 Grammaticalization versus lexicalization. ‘Methinks’ there is some confusion. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 355–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J.
1981 The management of grantings and rejections by parents in request sequences. Semiotica 37: 59–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, Alison
2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph
(ed.) 1902 The English Dialect Dictionary. London: Frowde.Google Scholar
Youssef, Valerie
1991 Variation as a feature of language acquisition in the Trinidad context. Language Variation and Change 3(1): 75–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M.
2005 More Illusions. Language Log. [URL] (9 February 2016).