Cover not available
Part of
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 147–178

New evidence for the Source–Goal asymmetry

Ancient Greek preverbs

| | | University of Pavia | University of Bergamo
This paper provides new evidence for the Source–Goal asymmetry by analyzing the synchronic behavior and the diachronic developments of Ancient Greek preverbs. This investigation is based on a diachronic corpus, including Homer as well as later prose, obtained by selecting a number of verbs representing different verb classes. Ancient Greek preverbs show both synchronic and diachronic asymmetries. The Goal is expressed by a larger number of preverbs than the Source, and is often associated with Location. Source-preverbs are more advanced in grammaticalization than Goal-preverbs: they are more obligatory, more easily repeated, and show a stronger tendency to develop actional meanings. Moreover, compounds with Source-preverbs often take a Goal-participant, whereas the opposite is not attested. These asymmetries are due to the syncretism undergone by Ancient Greek cases, which turned the genitive into a highly polysemous case.
Keywords: Ancient Greek, preverbs, Source–Goal asymmetry, grammaticalization, case syncretism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
    • 2.1Spatial relations in Cognitive Grammar
    • 2.2The typology of motion verbs
    • 2.3Grammaticalization theory
  • 3.Encoding spatial relations in Ancient Greek
  • 4.The synchronic Source–Goal asymmetries
  • 5.Source–Goal asymmetry in the grammaticalization of preverbs
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.06zan
References (56)
References
Beavers, John, Levin, Beth & Tham, Siao Wei. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P. 2010. Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline. 2004. Tmesis and Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1942. Le rôle et la valeur de en- dans la composition. Revue de Philologie 68, 115–125.Google Scholar
. 1953. Grammaire homérique, Tome 2: Syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
. 1999[1968]. Dictionnaire étymologicque de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Conti, Luz & Luraghi, Silvia. 2014. The AG partitive genitive in typological perspective. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 443–476. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Croft, William, Barðdal, Jóhanna, Hollmann, Willem, Sotirova, Violeta & Taoka, Chiaki. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Contrastive Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 10], Hans C. Boas (ed), 201–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi, Putzu, Ignazio & Ramat, Paolo. 2006. The Indo-European adverb in diachronic and typological perspective. Indogermanische Forschungen 111: 1–38.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1879. Die Grundlagen der griechischen Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M.. 2012. Orphan prefixes and the grammaticalization of aspect in South Slavic. Jezikoslovlje 13(1): 71–105.Google Scholar
Dunkel, George. 2014a. Lexicon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme, Band: Einleitung, Terminologie, Lautgesetze, Adverbialendungen, Nominalsuffixe, Anhäge und Indices. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
. 2014b. Lexicon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme, Band II: Lexicon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna. 2007. Talking about Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns [Studies in Language Companion Series 91]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Norman H., Sinha, Chris & Stedmon, Jacqui. 1981. The allative bias in 3-year-olds is almost proof against task naturalness. Journal of Child Language 8(2): 283–296.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewson, John & Bubenik, Vit. 2006. From Case to Adposition: The Development of Configurational Syntax in Indo-European Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 280]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 1981. Space and Time in Homer. Prepositional and Adverbial Particles in the Greek Epic. New York NY: Arno.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshiniko. 1987. ‘Source’ vs. ‘goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Conceps of Case, René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds), 122–146. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Imbert, Caroline. 2010. Multiple preverbation in Homeric Greek: A typological insight. CogniTextes [En ligne], Vol. 4. 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
Kabata, Kaori. 2013. Goal-source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: A cognitive-typological approach. Language Sciences 36: 78–89.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1964. Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Landau, Barbara. 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96(1): 1–33.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.. 1986. An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science 10: 1–40.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2004. Theory and method in grammaticalization. In Grammatikalisierung, Gabriele Diewald (ed.). Special issue of Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32: 152–187.Google Scholar
. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd Edn [Classics in Linguistics]. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lestrade, Sanders. 2010. The Space of Case. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Létoublon, Françoise. 1985. Il allait, pareil à la nuit. Les verbes de mouvement en grec: Supplétisme et aspect verbal. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2003. On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases: The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The internal structure of adpositional phrases and the notion of government. In Form and Function in Language Research: Papers in Honor of Christian Lehmann, Johannes Helmbrecht, Yoko Nishina, Zong-Min Shin, Stavros Skopeteas & Elisabeth Verhoeven (eds), 231–246. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2014. Plotting diachronic semantic maps. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 99–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. & Spencer, Andrew. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Neri, Sergio. 2013. Zum urindogermanischen Wort für ‘Hand’. In Multi Nominis Grammaticus. Studies in Classical and Indo-European Linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, Adam I. Cooper, Jeremy Rau & Michael Weiss (eds), 185–205. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2009. Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the source/goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47: 1113–1141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Lexical splits in the encoding of motion events from Archaic to Classical Greek. In Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing 41], Juliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Maslov, Boris. 2013. Redefining Constructio Praegnans: On the variation between allative and locative expressions in Ancient Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 13: 105–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina. 2010. The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources. Linguistics 48(5): 1043–1081. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Zheng, Mingyu. 2007. Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricca, Davide. 1993. I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nova Italia.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros. 2002. Lokale Konstruktionen im Griechischen: Sprachwandel in funktionaler Sicht. PhD dissertation, University of Erfurt.
Slobin, Dan I.. 1996. From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 195–217. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Rohde, Ada. 2004. The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 249–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria. 1994. The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1983. How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo (eds), 225–82. New York NY: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1988. The relation of grammar to cognition. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50], Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), 165–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme (eds). 2010. Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Frierich & Schmidt, Hans-Jörg. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annamarie. 2014. The Evolutionary Dynamics of Motion Event Encoding [Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Series]. Nijmegen: MPI.Google Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn, René Dirven & Radden, Günter. 1999. Putting concepts together: Syntax. In Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 1], René Dirven & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds), 87–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viti, Carlotta. 2008a. Coding spatial relations in Homeric Greek: Preverbs vs. prepositions. Historische Sprachforschung 121: 114–161.Google Scholar
. 2008b. From space words to transitive markers: The case of Ancient Greek en “in”. Transactions of the Philological Society 106: 375–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1964. Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists , 1035–1045.
Zanchi, Chiara. 2014. Multiple Preverbation in Homeric Greek. MA thesis, University of Pavia.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost. 2010. A hierarchy of locations: Evidence from the encoding of direction in adpositions and cases. Linguistics 48(5): 983–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Tan, Tamisha L.
2024. The morphosyntax of Gothic preverb compounds: incorporation and applicativisation. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 27:1 DOI logo
De Pasquale, Noemi
2021. ‘Invisible’ spatial meaning: a text-based study of covert Path encoding in Ancient Greek. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
De Pasquale, Noemi
2021. ‘Invisible’ spatial meaning: a text-based study of covert Path encoding in Ancient Greek. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet
2021. Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages. Studies in Language 45:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis
2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry. Constructions and Frames 10:1 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.