Part of
Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 112
Berlage, Eva
2014Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curme, George O.
1931Syntax. Boston MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2006Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2): 243–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Collostructional analysis: Measuring associations between constructions and lexical elements. In Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy [Human Cognitive Processing 43], Dylan Glynn & Justyna A. Robinson (eds), 391–404. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill
1999Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1940A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part V: Syntax. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Egan, Thomas
2008Emotion verbs with to-infinitive complements: From specific to general predication. In Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, Vol. I: Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 296], Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti & Marina Dossena (eds), 223–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1996On the historical development of English retrospective verbs. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 97: 71–79.Google Scholar
1997On patterns of complementation with verbs of effort. English Studies 78(1): 60–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2004Fitting a slim dime between the verb template and argument structure construction approaches. Theoretical Linguistics, 4(1–2): 113–1135. Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2009Colonial lag, colonial innovation or simply language change? In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B.
1985Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and the Literature, Randolph Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (eds), 11–30. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko
1922A Handbook of Present-Day English, Vols. 1–2, 3rd edn. Utrecht: Kemink & Zoon.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nick
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew
2012Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mondorf, Britta
Montgomery, Michael
2001British and Irish antecedents. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. VI: English in North America, John Algeo (ed.), 86–153. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik
1929A Grammar of Late Modern English, 2nd edn. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
1996The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Language Use, Language Acquisition and Language History: (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, Ingo Plag & Klaus Peter Schneider (eds), 25–44. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
2006The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Nikolaus Ritt, Herbert Schendl & Dieter Kastovsky (eds), 143–166. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009Nominal complements. In , One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani
2010Explaining grammatical variation and change: A case study of complementation in American English over three decades. Journal of English Linguistics 38(1): 4–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Changes in Complementation in British and American English: Corpus-Based Studies on Non-Finite Complements in Recent English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Linking Form and Meaning: Studies on Selected Control Patterns in Recent English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Infinitives and Gerunds in Recent English: Studies of Non-Finite Complements with Data from Large Corpora. London: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2003The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan T.
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vosberg, Uwe
2003The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of ‑ing-complements in Modern English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg and Britta Mondorf (eds), 305–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Die große Komplementverschiebung. Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar