Talk into vs convince to
Talking as a cause leading to containment, convincing as a cause leading to a result
This paper explores the causative constructions ‘talk NP into + ‑ing’ vs ‘convince NP to + infinitive’ by means of a collection of attested occurrences. It shows the connection between the characteristics described by Wierzbicka (1998), Gries & Stefanowitsch (2004) and Rudanko (2006) and the linguistically-signified semantic content involved in these structures. Wierzbicka’s account and the related Construction Grammar approach are shown to be wanting on both the descriptive and explanatory levels due to a distancing from the level on which a stable relation exists between meaning and linguistic form. An explanation of the distribution and semantics of the two constructions is proposed based on Langacker’s (1987) semiological principle, i.e. on the semantic content associated with each of the linguistic signs involved in these sequences.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Refining the observation of the empirical data
- 3.Explanations anyone?
- 4.Construction grammar, embodied cognition and the basic design architecture of human language
-
Notes
-
References
References (32)
References
Aissen, Judith. 1979. The Syntax of Causative Constructions. New York NY: Garland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baron, Naomi S. 1974. The structure of English causatives. Lingua 33: 299–342. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard & Polinsky, Maria. 1993. Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Smet, Hendrik. 2010. English ‑ing clauses and their problems: The structure of grammatical categories. Linguistics 48: 1153–1193. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duffley, Patrick J. 2006. The English Gerund-participle. A Comparison with the Infinitive. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Vyvyan. 2009. How Words Mean. Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy. 1975. Cause and control: On the semantics of interpersonal manipulation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 4, John P. Kimball (ed.), 59–89. New York NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, Stefan T. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2004. Covarying collexemes in the Into-causative. In Language, Culture, and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 225–236. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Jong Bok & Davies, Mark A. 2015. The into-causative construction in English: A construction-based perspective. English Language and Linguistics 20: 55–83.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George & Turner, Mark. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic
Metaphor. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paul, Hermann. 1880[1920]. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, Juhani. 2006. Emergent alternation in complement selection. The spread of transitive into -ing constructions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34: 312–331. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, Juhani. 2015.
Wheedled me into lending him my best hunter: comparing the emergence of the transitive into -ing pattern in British and American English. In Perspectives on Complementation: Structure, Variation and Boundaries, Mikko Höglund, Paul Rickman, Juhani Rudanko & Jukka Havu (eds), 128–140. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seuren, Pieter A. M. 2004. Chomsky’s Minimalism. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1976. The grammar of causative constructions. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 261–312. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Song, Jae Jung. 1996. Causatives and Causation. A Universal-typological Perspective. London: Addison Wesley Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, Leonard. 1976. Semantic causative types. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 43–116. New York NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tutton, Mark. 2009. When in means into: Towards an understanding of boundary-crossing in
. Journal of English Linguistics 37: 5–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verhagen, Arie & Kemmer, Suzanne. 1997. Interaction and causation: causative constructions in Modern Standard Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 61–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1998. The semantics of English causative constructions in a universal-typological perspective. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 1, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 113–153. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Flach, Susanne
2021.
From movement into action to manner of causation: changes in argument mapping in the into-causative.
Linguistics 59:1
► pp. 247 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.