Cover not available
Part of
Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 171–196

I would like to request for your attention

On the diachrony of prepositional verbs in Singapore English

| Universität Trier
This paper employs a diachronic corpus of newspaper data to investigate the use of a range of semantically redundant verb-particle combinations (e.g. to request for) in Singapore English since the 1950s. The findings are interpreted as evidence for possible processes of innovation and structural nativization, as outlined in Schneider’s (2003, 2007) dynamic model of post-colonial Englishes. The paper also touches on the motivations for speakers to employ such structures (e.g. analogy with existing forms, transparency) and shows that the results of parallel developments can be observed in other New – but not in native – Englishes world-wide, thus suggesting that we are dealing with strategies that are specific to ESL (English as a second language) contexts.
Keywords: prepositional verbs, corpus linguistics, diachrony, post-colonial English, Singapore English, structural nativization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Singapore English
    • 2.2Singapore standard English?
    • 2.2Prepositional verbs
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Retrieving prepositional verbs
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1The prepositional verbs to enter into and to await for
    • 5.2The prepositional verb to request for
    • 5.3The prepositional verb to leverage on
  • 6.Prepositional verbs in new Englishes
  • 7.Concluding remarks and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.195.10hof
References (52)
References
Bamgboṣe, Ayo. 1982. Standard Nigerian English: Issues of identification. In The Other Tongue: English across Cultures, Braj B. Kachru (ed), 99–109. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2009. One in Singapore English. Studies in Language 33(2): 338–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. A usage-based approach to substratum transfer: The case of four unproductive features in Singapore English. Language 86(4): 792–820.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Wee, Lionel. 1999. The passive in Singapore English. World Englishes 18(1): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biewer, Carolin, Bernaisch, Tobias, Berger, Mike & Heller, Benedikt. 2014. Compiling the diachronic corpus of Hong Kong English (DC-HKE): motivation, progress and challenges. Poster presentation at ICAME 35, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley. 2002. Hong Kong English Today. Autonomy and Creativity. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Borlongan, A. M. & Dita, S. N. 2015. Taking a look at expanded predicates in Philippine English across time. Asian Englishes 17(3): 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brato, Thorsten. 2014. Compiling a historical written corpus of Ghanaian English: Methodological and theoretical considerations. Paper presented at the 20th Conference of the International Association for World Englishes, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Bruthiaux, Paul. 2010. The Speak Good English Movement: A web-user’s perspective. In English in Singapore: Modernity and Management, Lisa Lim, Anne Pakir & Lionel Wee (eds), 91–108. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deterding, David. 2007. Singapore English. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fritz, Clemens. 2007. From English in Australia to Australian English: 1788–1900. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garside, Robert. 1987. The CLAWS word-tagging system. In The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-based Approach, Robert Garside, Geoffrey Leech & Geoffrey Sampson (eds), 30–41. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gonzales, Andrew. 1983. When does an error become a feature of Philippine English? In Varieties of English in Southeast Asia, Richard B. Noss (ed.), 150–172. Singapore: Regional Language Centre.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anthea Fraser. 1986. A standard for written Singapore English? English World-Wide 7(1): 75–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Colonisation, migration and functions of English. In Englishes around the World: General Studies, British Isles, North America. Studies in Honour of Manfred Görlach, Vol. 1 [Varieties of English around the World G18], Edgar W. Schneider (ed), 47–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The language ecology of Singapore. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Nancy H. Hornberger (ed), 2990–3002. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Singapore Standard English revisited. In English in Singapore: Modernity and Management, Lisa Lim, Anne Pakir & Lionel Wee (eds), 57–89. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars. 2006. Codeswitching on the Web: English and Jamaican Creole in E-mail Communication [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 147]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 1998. New Zealand English Grammar – Fact or Fiction? A Corpus-based Study in Morphosyntactic Variation [Varieties of English around the World G23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Mair, Christian. 1999. ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1982. Models of non-native Englishes. In The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures , Braj B. Kachru (ed.), 31–57. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
1985. Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the language and the literature, Randolph Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (eds), 11–30. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leimgruber, Jakob R. E. 2013a. Singapore English: Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b. The trouble with World Englishes: Rethinking the concept of ‘geographical varieties’ of English. English Today 29(3): 3–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leitner, Gerhard. 1992. English as a pluricentric language. In Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations, Michael Clyne (ed.), 179–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster, online. <[URL]> (6 February 2017).
Moag, Rodney F. 1982. The life cycle of non-native Englishes: A case study. In The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures, Braj B. Kachru (ed), 270–288. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Gries, Stefan T. 2009. Collostructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide 30(1): 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide 27: 147–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Hundt, Marianne. 2011. Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, online. <[URL]> (6 February 2017).
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schilk, Marco. 2011. Structural Nativization in Indian English Lexicogrammar [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2004. How to trace structural nativization: Particle verbs in World Englishes. World Englishes 23(2): 227–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Exploring the interface between World Englishes and second language acquisition – and implications for English as a lingua franca. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca1(1): 57–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Gerold & Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2016. Detecting innovations in a parsed corpus of learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2(2): 177–204.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Gerold & Zipp, Lena. 2013. Discovering new verb-preposition combinations in New Englishes. In Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Focus on Non-Native Englishes [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 13], Magnus Huber & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2003. Isolation and Language Change: Contemporary and Sociohistorical Evidence from Tristan da Cunha English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. St Helenian English: Origins, Evolution and Variation [Varieties of English around the World G37]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedlatschek, Andreas. 2009. Contemporary Indian English. Variation and Change [Varieties of English around the World G38]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singapore Department of Statistics. 2010. Census of Population 2010 Statistical Release 1. Demographic Characteristics, Education, Language and Religion. Singapore: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade & Industry, Republic of Singapore.Google Scholar
Stroud, Christopher & Wee, Lionel. 2010. Language policy and planning in Singaporean late modernity. In English in Singapore: Modernity and Management, Lisa Lim, Anne Pakir & Lionel Wee (eds), 181–204. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Siew Imm. 2016. Charting the endonormative stabilization of Singapore English. In Communicating with Asia: The Future of English as a Global Language, Gerhard Leitner, Azirah Hashim & Hans-Georg Wolf (eds), 69–84. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2013. Nativized prepositional verbs in Malaysian English from the perspective of language contact. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies 3: 103–114.Google Scholar
Wee, Lionel. 2014. Linguistic chutzpah and the Speak Good Singlish Movement. World Englishes 33(1): 85–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

ROMASANTA, RAQUEL P.
2022. Negation as a predictor of clausal complement choice in World Englishes. English Language and Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. Conclusion. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English, ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.