Abraham, Werner. 2006. Bare and prepositional differential case marking: The exotic case of German (and Icelandic) among all of Germanic. In Kulikov, Malchukov & de Swart (eds), 115–145.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., Dixon, Robert M. W. & Onishi, Masayuki (eds). 2001. Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21: 435–448.
Andrews, Avery D.1976. The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. North Eastern Linguistic Society 6: 1–21.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000. The subject is nominative! On obsolete axioms and their deep-rootedness. In 17th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Carl-Erik Lindberg & Steffen Nordahl Lund (eds), 93–117. Odense: Institute of Language and Communication.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2004. The semantics of the impersonal construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: Beyond thematic roles. In Focus on Germanic Typology, Werner Abraham (ed.), 105–137. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2006. Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17(1): 39–106.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2009. The development of case in Germanic. In Barðdal & Chelliah (eds), 123–159.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2011. The rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A diachronic construction grammar approach. Lingua 121(1): 60–79.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2014. Syntax and syntactic reconstruction. In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 343–373. London: Routledge.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Arnett, Carlee, Carey, Stephen Mark, Eythórsson, Thórhallur, Jenset, Gard B., Kroonen, Guus & Oberlin, Adam. 2016. Dative subjects in Germanic: A computational analysis of lexical semantic verb classes across time and space. STUF: Language Typology and Universals 69(1): 49–84.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður, Danesi, Serena, Dewey, Tonya Kim, Eythórsson, Thórhallur, Fedriani, Chiara & Smitherman, Thomas. 2013. The story of ‘Woe’. Journal of Indo-European Studies 41(3–4): 321–377.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Dewey, Tonya Kim. 2014. Alternating predicates in Icelandic and German: A sign-based construction grammar account. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 93: 50–101.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Smitherman, Thomas. 2013. The quest for cognates: A reconstruction of oblique subject constructions in Proto-Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change 3(1): 28–67.
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata (eds). 2004. Non-Nominative Subjects, Vols. I–II [Typological Studies in Language 60–61]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bickel, Balthasar. 2004. The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao, Vol. 1, 77–111.
Bickel, Balthasar. 2011. Grammatical relations typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 399–444. Oxford: OUP.
Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður. 2014. The oblique anticausative in Lithuanian. Baltistica 49(1): 15–39..
Cennamo, Michela, Barðdal, Jóhanna & van Gelderen, Elly (eds). 2012. Variation and change in argument realization. A special guest-edited issue in Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 311–442.
Cennamo, Michela, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2015. Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53(4): 677–729.
Comrie, Bernard. 1973. The ergative: Variations on a theme. Lingua 32: 239–253.
Conti, Luz. 2008. Synchronie und Diachronie des altgriechischen Genitivs als Semisubjekt. Historische Sprachforschung 121: 94–113.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Danesi, Serena, Johnson, Cynthia A. & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2017. Between the historical languages and the reconstructed language: An alternative approach to the Gerundive + “Dative of Agent” construction in Indo-European. Indogermanische Forschungen 122: 143–188.
Danesi, Serena, Cynthia A. Johnson & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2018. Where does the modality of Ancient Greek modal verbs come from? The relation between modality and oblique case marking. Journal of Greek Linguistics 18(1): 45–92.
Dik, Simon C.1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dixon, Robert M. W.1997. The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: CUP.
Donohue, Cathryn & Barðdal, Jóhanna (eds). 2011. Empirical approaches to morphological case. A special guest-edited issue in Morphology 21(3–4): 481–654.
Dryer, Martin. 2006. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Catching Language: The Standard Challenge of Grammar Writing, Felix Ameka, Alan Charles Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), 207–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dryer, Matthew S.1997. Are grammatical relations universal? In Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Dedicated to T. Givón, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 117–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2005. Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 81(4): 824–881.
Fedriani, Chiara. 2011. Experiential metaphors in Latin: Feelings were containers, movements and things possessed. Transactions of the Philological Society 109(3): 307–326.
Fedriani, Chiara. 2014. Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hansen, Björn. 2016. Beyond b-subjects: Testing subjecthood in Croatian modal constructions. Talk presented at the workshop “Forty Years after Keenan 1976: Subject Properties and Subject Tests”, 7–9 September, Ghent.
von Heusinger, Klaus & Kaiser, Georg A.2011. Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish. Morphology 21(3–4): 593–617.
Hock, Hans H.1990. Oblique subjects in Sanskrit? In Verma & Mohanan (eds), 119–139.
Hock, Hans Heinrich & Bashir, Elena. 2016. The Languages and Linguistics of South Asia: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Holvoet, Axel. 2013. Obliqueness, quasi-subjects and transitivity in Baltic and Slavonic. In Seržant & Kulikov (eds), 257–282.
de Hoop, Helen & de Swart, Peter (eds). 2008. Differential Subject Marking. Dordrecht: Springer.
Iemmolo, Giorgio & Klumpp, Gerson (eds). 2014. Differential object marking: Theoretical and empirical issues. A special issue of Linguistics 52(2): 271–602.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1996. Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Jónsson, Jóhannes G. & Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2005. Variation in subject case marking in insular Scandinavian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 223–245.
Keenan, Edward L.1976. Towards a universal definition of subject. In Li (ed.), 303–333.
Kikusawa, Ritsuko. 2002. Proto Central Pacific Ergativity: Its Reconstruction and Development in the Fijian, Rotuman and Polynesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Kulikov, Leonid, Malchukov, Andrej & de Swart, Peter (eds). 2006. Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Landau, Idan. 2009. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Le Mair, Esther, Johnson, Cynthia A., Frotscher, Michael, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2017. Position as a behavioral property of subjects: The case of Old Irish. Indogermanische Forschungen 122: 111–142.
Li, Charles N. (ed.). 1976. Subject and Topic. New York NY: Academic press.
Luraghi, Silvia. 2016. The dative of agent in Indo-European languages. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 69(1): 15–47.
Malchukov, Andrej L.2008. Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118(2): 203–221.
Malchukov, Andrej L. & de Hoop, Helen. 2011. Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking. Lingua 121(1): 35–47.
Malchukov, Andrej L. & Spencer, Andrew (eds). 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: OUP.
Masica, Colin P.1976. Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The emergence of agentive systems. In The Typology of Semantic Alignment Systems, Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), 297–333. Oxford: OUP.
Moore, John & Perlmutter, David M.2000. What does it take to be a dative subject?Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416.
Mørck, Endre. 1994. The distribution of subject properties and the acquisition of subjecthood in the West Scandinavian languages. In Language Change and Language Structure: Older Germanic Languages in a Comparative Perspective, Toril Swan, Endre Mørck & Olaf J. Westwik (eds), 159–194. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Onishi, Masayuki. 2001. Introduction: Non-canonically marked subjects and objects; parameters and properties. In Aikhenvald, Dixon & Onishi (eds), 1–51.
Primus, Beatrice. 2011. Case marking typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 303–321. Oxford: OUP.
Queixalós, Francesc & Gildea, Spike. 2010. Manifestations of Ergativity in Amazonia. In Ergativity in Amazonia [Typological Studies in Language 89], Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalós (eds), 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rákosi, György. 2006. Dative Experiencer Predicates in Hungarian. Utrecht: LOT.
Reis, Marga. 1982. Zum Subjektbegriff im Deutschen. In Satzglieder im Deutschen. Vorschläge zur syntaktischen, semantischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, Werner Abraham (ed.), 171–211. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Sandal, Catrine. 2011. Akkusative subjekt og antikausativitet i norrønt (Accusative Subjects and Anticausativity in Old Norse). MA thesis, University of Bergen.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1978. Subjekt und Ergativ: Zur pragmatischen Grundlage primärer grammatischer Relationen. Folia Linguistica 12: 219–252.
Seržant, Ilja. 2013. The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects. In Seržant & Kulikov (eds), 313–360.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1999. Dative subject constructions twenty-two years later. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29(2): 45–76.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. PhD dissertation, Lund University.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1991. Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327–362.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á.2003. Case: Abstract vs. morphological. In New Perspectives on Case Theory, Ellen Brandner & Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 223–268. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Steever, Sanford B. (ed.) 1998. The Dravidian Languages. London: Routledge.
Svenonius, Peter. 2002. Icelandic case and the structure of events. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5(1–3): 197–225.
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21(2): 385–396.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.1991. Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 145–194.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.2005. Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.2009. Case in role and reference grammar. In The Handbook of Case, Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 102–120. Oxford: OUP.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP.
Verma, Mahendra K. & Mohanan, Karravanur Puthanvettil (eds). 1990. Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 111–130.
Yoon, James H.2004. Non-nominative (major) subjects and case stacking in Korean. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao, Vol. 2, 265–314.
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1985. Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483.