Part of
Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond
Edited by Marco García García and Melanie Uth
[Studies in Language Companion Series 201] 2018
► pp. 313356
References
Amsili, Pascal & Beyssade, Claire
2010Obligatory presupposition in discourse. In Constraints in Discourse, Pragmatics and Beyond, Vol. 2 [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 194], Peter Kühnlein, Anton Benz & Candace L. Sidner (eds), 105–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Benazzo, Sandra, Dimroth, Christine, Perdue, Clive & Watorek, Marzena
2004Le rôle des particules additives dans la construction de la cohésion discursive en langue maternelle et en langue étrangère. Langages 155: 76–105.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benazzo, Sandra & Dimroth, Christine
2015Additive particles in Romance and Germanic languages: Are they really similar? In Focus Particles in the Romance and Germanic Languages. Corpus-based and Experimental Approaches, Anna-Maria De Cesare & Cecelia Andorno (eds). Linguistik Online 71.Google Scholar
Benazzo, Sandra & Patin, Cédric
2017French additive aussi: Does prosody matter? In Focus on additivity. Focus on Additivity. Adverbial modifiers in Romance, Germanic and Slavic languages, Anna Maria De Cesare & Cecilia Andorno (eds), 107–136. Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Slobin, Dan I.
(eds) 1994Different Ways of Relating Events in Narrative: A Cross-linguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bosch, Peter, Rozario, Tom & Zhao, Tom
2003 Demonstrative Pronouns and Personal Pronouns. German der vs. er . Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), Budapest.Google Scholar
Carroll, Mary, von Stutterheim, Christiane & Nuese, Ralf
2004The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In Approaches to Language Production, Christopher Habel & Thomas Pechmann (eds), 183–218. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Doetjes, Jenny & Sleeman, Petra
2004Dislocation. In Handbook of French Semantics, Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds), 501–528. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Dimroth, Christine
2002Topics, assertions and additive words: How L2 learners get from information structure to target language syntax. Linguistics 40: 891–923.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Fokuspartikeln und Informationsgliederung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Google Scholar
2009Stepping stones and stumbling blocks. Why negation accelerates and additive particles delay the acquisition of finiteness in German. In Functional Categories in Learner Language, Christine Dimroth & Peter Jordens (eds), 137–170. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Videoclips zur Elizitation von Erzählungen: Methodische Überlegungen und einige Ergebnisse am Beispiel der „Finite Story“. In Einblicke in die Zweitspracherwerbsforschung und ihre methodischen Verfahren, Bernt Ahrenholz (eds), 77–98. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, Christine, Andorno, Cecilia, Benazzo, Sandra & Verhagen, Josje
2010Given claims about new topics. How Romance and Germanic speakers link changed and maintained information in narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3328–3344.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine & Fränkel, Manuela
2012Particles, maximize presupposition and discourse management. Lingua 122(15): 1801–1818.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Féry, Caroline
2012Prosody and information structure of the German particles selbst, wieder and auch . In Prosody Matters: Essays in Honor of Elisabeth O. Selkirk, Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Takahito Shinya & Mariko Sugahara (eds), 441–468. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Gayraud, Frédérique
2004Emergence et développement du placement des particules de portée. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 20: 173–196.Google Scholar
Guimier, Claude
2000Non congruence et congruence: Alors que vs. tandis que. Syntaxe et Sémantique 1: 80–112.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, Maya
2003Children’s Discourse: Person, Time, and Space across Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hickmann, Maya, Taranne, Pierre & Bonnet, Philippe
2009Motion in first language acquisition: Manner and path in French and in English. Journal of Child Language 36(4): 705–741.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, Maya & Hendriks, Henriëtte
1999Cohesion and anaphora in children’s narratives: A comparison of English, French, German and Chinese. Journal of Child Language 26: 419–52.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Barbara, Berger, Frauke, Müller, Anja, Schmitz, Michaela & Weissenborn, Jürgen
2009Focus particles in children’s language. Production and comprehension of auch ‘also’ in German learners from 1 year to 4 years of age. Language Acquisition 16: 36–66.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
1992Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Joachim Jacobs (eds), 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, Afke
2003Merging Scope particles. Word order variation and the acquisition of aussi and ook in a bilingual context. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], Christine Dimroth & Marianne Starren (eds), 211–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ji, Yinglin, Hendriks, Henriëtte & Hickmann, Maya
2011How children express caused motion events in Chinese and English: Universal and language-specific influences. Lingua 121: 1796–1819.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
2006On finiteness. In Semantics in Acquisition, Veerle van Geenhoven (eds), 245–272. Dordrecht: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012The information structure of French. In The Expression of Information Structure, Manfred Kriffka & Renate Musan (eds), 95–126. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1998Additive particles under stress. In Proceedings of SALT 8, Devon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 111–128. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Leray, Estelle
2009Additive focus particles in bilingual language acquisition. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 205–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nederstigt, Ulrike
2003‘Auch’ and ‘noch’in child and adult German. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penner, Zvi, Tracy, Rosemarie & Wymann, Karin
1999Die Rolle der Fokuspartikel AUCH im frühen kindlichen Lexikon. In Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb, Jörg Maibauer & Monika Rothweiler (eds), 229–251. Tübingen: UTB Franke.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga & Rosengren, Inger
1997A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: The case of German auch . Journal of Semantics 14: 237–309.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riégel, Martin, Pellat, Jean-Christophe & Rioul, Rene
1994Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johan
2004Conversationl contrast and conventional parallel: Topic implicatures and additive presuppositions. Journal of Semantics 21(2): 199–217.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schimke, Sarah, Colonna, Saveria & Hickmann, Maya
2015Reference in French and German: A developmental perspective. In Referential and Relational Discourse Coherence in Adults and Children, Natalia Gagarina, Nadja Kühn & Renate Musan (eds). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
1996From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John Gumperz & Stephen Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane & Klein, Wolfgang
2002Quaestio und l-perspectivation. In Perspectivity and Perspectivation in Discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 9] Carl Friedrich Graumann & Werner Kallmeyer (eds), 59–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane, Halm, Ute & Carroll, Mary
2012Macrostructural principles and the development of narrative competence in L1 German: The role of grammar (8–14-year-olds). In Comparative Perspectives to Language Acquisition: Tribute to Clive Perdue, Marzena Watorek, Sandra Benazzo & Maya Hickmann (eds), 559–585. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sudhoff, Stefan
2008Focus particles in the German middlefield. In The Discourse Potential of Underspecified Structures: Event Structures and Information Structure, Anita Steube (eds), 439–459. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trévise, Anne
1986Topicalisation, is it transferable? In Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition, Michael Sharwood Smith & Eric Kellerman (eds), 186–206 Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Turco, Giusy, Dimroth, Christine & Braun, Bettina
2012Intonational means to mark verum focus in German and French. Language and Speech 56: 460–490.Google Scholar
Watorek, Marzena
2004Construction du discours par des enfants et des apprenants adultes. Langages 155.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Benazzo, Sandra & Katia Paykin
2017. Chapter 9. Additive relations in L2 French. In Focus on Additivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 278],  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Reimer, Laura
2023. The modal particle elicitation test. Pedagogical Linguistics 4:2  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Uth, Melanie & Marco García García
2018. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 201],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.