Cover not available
Part of
New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 1–20

Introduction

Grammaticalization in the 2010s – A dialogue between the old and the new

| The University of Manchester
| University of Rouen
Article outline
  • 1.Grammaticalization from 1980s–2000s
  • 2.Grammaticalization in the 2010s as reflected in this volume
    • 2.1A revival of typological explorations of grammaticalization
    • 2.2Accounting for the distinctive features of the development of discourse markers as grammaticalization
    • 2.3Modelling grammaticalization: Diachronic construction grammar and lexical functional grammar
    • 2.4Revisiting the cognitive principles underlying and motivating grammaticalization
  • Brief summary and outlook
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.01bre
References (97)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticalization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19:2], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Methodologische Überlegungen zu Grammatikalisierung, zyklischem Wandel und dem Wechsel von Analytik zu Synthetik – und zyklisch weiter zu Analytik (?). In Kodierungstechniken im Wandel: Das Zusammenspiel von Analytik und Synthese in Gegenwartsdeutschen, Dagmar Bittner & Livio Gaeta (eds), 249–274. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistic 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Couper-Kuhlen, Elisabeth. 2002. On the development of final ‘though’: A case of grammaticalization? In Wischer & Diewald (eds), 345–361.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Diewald, Gabriele (eds). 2008. Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti & Vincent, Nigel. 2011. Grammaticalization and directionality. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 163–176.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Vincent, Nigel & Walkden, George. 2015. On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological Society 113: 363–382.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88: 1–44.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine. 2009. Structural persistence: A case based on the grammaticalization of English adjectives of difference. English Language and Linguistics 13: 77–96.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte. 2011. Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte, Ghesquière, Lobke & Van de Velde, Freek (eds). 2014. Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse. Theoretical and Descriptive Advances [Benjamins Current Topics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Function. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. From matrix clause to pragmatic marker: The history of look-forms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2: 177–199.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization reconsidered: On the late use of temporal adverbs. In English Historical Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223], Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María José López-Couso (eds), 67–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere Dale & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle (ed.). 2001. Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment. Special issue of Language Sciences 23(2–3).Google Scholar
Croft, William, 2007. Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 463–508. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds). 2010. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline. 2015. Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16: 59–85.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 1997. Grammatikalisierung: Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden Grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Wischer & Diewald (eds), 103–120.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know . Studier i Modern Sprakvetenskap 10: 76–92.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization as analogy-driven change. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 31–42.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette & Stein, Dieter (eds). 2000. Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2004. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies 6: 427–448.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam. 2009. Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames 1: 261–290.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 1993. The Rise of Functional Categories [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2010. On the subjectification and intersubjectification paths followed by the adjectives of completeness. In Davidse, Vandelanotte & Cuyckens (eds), 277–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Brems, Lieselotte & Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification: Typology and operationalization. In Brems, Ghesquière & Van de Velde (eds), 129–153.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Hopper, Paul J. 1998. The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Patten, Amanda. 2011. Construction grammar and grammaticalization. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 92–104.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37: 1043–1068.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Wischer & Diewald (eds), 83–101.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The areal dimension of grammaticalization. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 291–301.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana. 2009. Information Structure and Language Change: New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Yukio. 2000. Public and private self as two aspects of the speaker: A contrastive study of Japanese and English. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1623–1656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent grammar. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 139–157.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 2008. Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In Cross-Linguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multi-Functionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 99–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003[1993]. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2011. Grammaticalization: A general critique. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 193–205.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35: 848–893.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 57–139. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318.Google Scholar
. 1995[1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom. First published in 1982 as Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch. [Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projektes]. University of Cologne, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Wischer & Diewald (eds), 1–18.Google Scholar
. 2004. Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32: 152–187.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Information structure and grammaticalisation. In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 77], Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds), 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Seoane, Elena (eds). 2008. Rethinking Grammaticalization. New Perspectives & Theoretical Issues in Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 76–77]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2011. Grammaticalization and language contact. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 279–290.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1912. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia 12: 6. Reprinted in Meillet, Antoine. 1921[1948, 1965]. Linguistique Historique et Linguistique Générale, 130–148. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli, López-Couso, María José & Los, Bettelou. 2012. Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno Cabrera, Juan C. 1998. On the relationship between grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Giacalone Ramat & Hopper (eds), 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2014. Beyond intersubjectification: Textual uses of modality and mood in subordinate clauses as part of speech-act orientation . In Brems, Ghesquière & Van de Velde (eds), 29–51.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2017. Grammaticalization. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds), 7–27. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 1998. Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14: 177–202.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1997. Scope and the development of epistemic modality: Evidence from ought to . English Language and Linguistics 1: 295–317.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onodera, Noriko. 1995. Diachronic analysis of Japanese discourse markers. In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35], Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), 393–437. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 1992. Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics 30: 549–560.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1993. A formal account of grammaticalization in the history of Romance futures. Folia Linguistica Historica 13: 219–258.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In Giacalone Ramat & Hopper (eds), 229–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual to expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24], Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008a. “All that he endeavoured to prove was …”: On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogic contexts. In Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution, Ruth Kempson & Robin Cooper (eds), 143–177. London: King’s College Publications.Google Scholar
. 2008b. The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In Constructions and Language Change, Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 21–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Davidse, Vandelanotte & Cuyckens (eds), 29–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 19–30.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds). 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vols. I & II [Typological Studies in Language 19]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & König, Ekkehard. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme (eds). 2010. Gradualness, Gradience, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2011. Grammaticalization and discourse. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 413–423.Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2000. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization: ‘Methinks’ there is some confusion. In Fischer, Rosenbach & Stein (eds), 355–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds). 2002. New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Childs, Claire
2021. Mechanisms of Grammaticalization in the Variation of Negative Question Tags. Journal of English Linguistics 49:4 ► pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Martel Paredes, Víctor Arturo
2020. Pluralidad del evento en el castellano peruano: construcciones frecuentativas «pasarse» + gerundio y «parar» + gerundio. Forma y Función 33:2 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.