Grammaticalizing connectives in English and discourse information structure
Diana M. Lewis | Aix Marseille University | Laboratoire Parole et Langage
The development of lexical expressions such as VP adverbs, matrix clauses and prepositional phrases into discourse markers and connectives expressing coherence relations has been well explored in the grammaticalization literature, under a broad view of grammaticalization, but there has been less emphasis on how the discourse information structuring functions of markers evolve during these developments. This paper investigates the relationship between discourse coherence marking and information structure by examining two developing discourse connectives: it suggests that the grammaticalization of a lexeme in its construction into a discourse marker may involve acquiring or strengthening discourse-level information structuring functions – indicating relative informational salience – and that (further) grammaticalization of markers may be at least partly directed by information structure.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Discourse connectives
- 2.1Grammaticalization and discourse connectives
- 2.2Positions of discourse connectives
- 2.3Coherence relations and information structure
- 3.Grammaticalizing discourse connectives and position
- 3.1Two recent Engish connectives
- 3.2In fact
- 3.2.1Evolution of ‘in fact’
- 3.1.2Position of in fact
- 3.3After all
- 3.3.1Evolution of after all
- 3.3.2Position of ‘after all’
- 3.4Findings for ‘in fact’ and ‘after all’
- 4.Grammaticalization and information structure beyond the sentence
- 5.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
Appendix
-
References
References (49)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. ‘I think’ – An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1– 47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, Karin. 2016. Pragmatic markers as constructions. The case of anyway
. In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Kreizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 29–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich. 2014. Introduction. In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery, Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds), 1–23. Leiden: Brill.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, Diane. 1996. Are apposition markers discourse markers? Journal of Linguistics 32(2): 325–347.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlson, Lynn & Marcu, Daniel. 2001. Discourse Tagging Reference Manual. ISI Tech Report ISI-TR-545, July 2001. [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, Holger. 2005. Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics 43(3): 449–470.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David. 2003. The dual analysis of adjuncts/complements in Categorial Grammar. In Modifying Adjuncts, Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 33–66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know
. Studier i Modern Språkvetenskap 10: 76–93.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosytactic Change. Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentens, Caroline, Kimps, Ditte, Davidse, Kristin, Jacobs, Gilles, Van linden, An & Brems, Lieselotte. 2016. Mirativity and rhetorical structure. The development and prosody of disjunct and anaphoric adverbials with no wonder
. In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 125–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hancil, Sylvie. 2014. The final particle ‘but’ in British English. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series 162], Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds), 235–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje (eds). 2015. Final Particles. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hankamer, Jorge. 1977. Multiple analyses. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 583–607. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar. The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haselow, Alexander. 2015. Left vs. right periphery in grammaticalization. The case of anyway
. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series 166], Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds), 157–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania. 2015. Some observations on the evolution of final particles. In Final Particles, Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds), 111–140. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Min-Jo & Jahnke, Nathan. 2011. The meaning of utterance-final even
. Journal of English Linguistics 39(1): 36–64.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, Christian. 2008. Information structure and grammaticalization. In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 77], Elena Seoane & Marie-José López Couso (eds), 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and Rhetoric. Adverbial Connectors in the History of English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewis, Diana M. 1998. From modal adverbial to discourse connective: Some rhetorical effects in present-day English. In Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 2, Jef Verschueren (ed.), 363–375. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewis, Diana M. 2011. A discourse-constructional approach to the emergence of discourse connectives in English. Linguistics 49(2): 415–443.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization [ISI Report RS-87–190]. Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mithun, Marianne. 2016. Discourse and grammar. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn, Heidi Hamilton, Deborah Schiffrin & Deborah Tannen (eds), 9–41. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polanyi, Livia, van den Berg, Martin & Ahn, David. 2003. Discourse structure and sentential information structure: An initial proposal. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12(3): 337–350.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schweinberger, Martin. 2015. Comparing ‘like’ in Irish and British Englishes. In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 258], Carolina P. Amador Moreno, Kevin McCafferty & Elaine Vaughan (eds), 114–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stede, Manfred. 2008. Disambiguating rhetorical structure. Research on Language and Computation 6: 311–332.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, University of Manchester, August 1995.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1997. The discourse connective after all: A historical pragmatic account. Paper presented at the Sixteenth International Congress of Linguists, Paris, July 1997.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2013. ‘I must wait on myself, must I?’ at right periphery of the clause in English. Talk given at Lund University, 4 September 2013.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2014. On the function of the epistemic adverbs ‘surely’ and ‘no doubt’ at the left and right peripheries of the clause. In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery, Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds), 72–91. Leiden: Brill.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2015. Investigating ‘periphery’ from a functionalist perspective. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1): 119–130.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Ruskan, Anna & Marta Carretero
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.