Part of
New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change
Edited by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and José Vicente Lozano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 202] 2018
► pp. 291314
References
Adamson, Sylvia
2000A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan & Burbano Elizondo, Lourdes & Llamas, Carmen
2012Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teeside. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine
2006Grammaticalization and subjectification of the English adjectives of general comparison. In Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity, Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds), 241–278. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Grammaticalization, subjectification, and leftward movement of English adjectives of difference in the noun phrase. Folia Linguistica 42(3): 259–305.Google Scholar
2009Structural persistence: A case based on the grammaticalization of English adjectives of difference. English Language and Linguistics 13(1): 77–96.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Sandra
2010Newfoundland and Labrador English. Edinburgh: EUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2011Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49: 365–390.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan
2004subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies 6: 427–448.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra A.
1996Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 14–164. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke
2010On the subjectification and intersubjectification paths followed by the adjeectives of completeness. In Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization [Topics in English Linguistics 66], Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 277–314. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Brems, Liselotte & Van de Velde Freek
2012Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification: Typology and operationalization. English Text Constructioni 5(1): 128–152.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie
2014The final particle but in British English: An instance of cooptation and grammaticalization at work. In Grammaticalization – Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series 162], Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds), 235–255. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015Grammaticalization of final but: From discourse connective to final particle. In Hancil, Haselow & Post (eds), 157–172.Google Scholar
2016Périphérie droite et macro-grammaire. In Modèles Linguistiques, Isabelle Gaudy-Campbell & Héloïse Parent (eds), 133–154. Paris: Éditions des Dauphins.Google Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje
2015Final Particles. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2013Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & König, Christa
2010On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences 32: 87–131.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heltoft, Lars
2010Paradigmatic structure in a usage-based theory of grammaticalisation. In Language Usage and Language Structure, Kasper Boye & Elizabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds), 145–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Traugott, Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko N. & Katsunobu, Izutsu
2014Truncation and backshift: Two pathways to sentence-final coordinating conjunctions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15: 1, 62–92.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, J. & Thompson, S. A.
2008The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Laury R. Aspects of Grammaticalization. (Inter)subjectification and Directionality. The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 179–204. Amsterdam, Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mulder, J., Thompson, S.A. & Williams, C. P.
2009Final but in Australian English conversation. In Peters, P., Collins, P. & Smith, A. (eds.), Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English, 339–359. Amsterdam. Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heike
2016Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. In Aspects of Grammaticalization. (Inter)subjectification and Directionality, Hubert Cuyckens, Lobke Ghesquière & Dan Olmen (eds), 19–46. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens & Heltoft, Lars
2015Grammaticalization as paradigmatisation. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series 166], Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit (eds), 261–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nørgård-Sørensen, Jens, Helthoft, Lars & Schøsler, Lene
2011Connecting Grammaticalization [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Gail
(eds) 1996Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features found in preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 232–254. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1996Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson (eds), 52–133.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail & Harvey Sacks
1977The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2): 361–382.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers.Cambridge: CUP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Chaofen & Traugott, Elizabeth
2011Grammaticalization and word order change. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heike Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 378–388. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Constructions in grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds), 624–647.Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
2010(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization [Topics in English Linguistics 66], Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2004New Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2022. American and Irish English speakers’ perceptions of the final particles so and but. World Englishes 41:2  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.