Cover not available
Part of
Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Evelien Keizer and Hella Olbertz
[Studies in Language Companion Series 205] 2018
► pp. 89–130

External possessor constructions and Cree relational inflection compared

 | University of Manitoba
This chapter presents the results of fieldwork and research on the relational inflection in Cree (Cenerini 2014). This form is functionally and formally similar to External Possessor Constructions (EPCs) in Romance and Germanic languages: they both acknowledge participants who are not syntactically licensed by the verb, but that the Speaker perceives to be topical, or particularly affected by the action, and with which she/he empathises. However, unlike the EPC, the relational inflection is not restricted to cases of possession, and is limited only to third person referents. Also, rather than indirect object marking, the relational is realized as a verbal suffix. Finally, it will be argued that, as both constructions are motivated by pragmatic factors, Van de Velde’s (2013) representation of EPCs as Subacts at the Interpersonal Level can be extended to the relational inflection.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The relational inflection
  • 3.External possessor constructions (EPCs)
  • 4.Pragmatic similarities between EPCs and the relational
    • 4.1Possessor affectedness
    • 4.2Speaker empathy
    • 4.3Participant topicality
  • 5.Syntactic similarities between EPCs and the relational
  • 6.Syntactic differences between EPCs and the relational
    • 6.1Noun Phrase configurationality
    • 6.2Cree as a non-configurational language
      • 6.2.1Word order
      • 6.2.2Zero-anaphora
      • 6.2.3Discontinuous noun phrases
  • 7.Interpretation of EPCs and relational within FDG
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.205.04cen
References (53)
References
Ahenakew, Freda. 1987. wâskahikaniwiyiniw-âcimowina: Stories of the House People. Winnipeg: The University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Ahenakew, Freda & Wolfart, H. C. 1992. kôhkominawak otâcimowiniwâwa: Our grandmothers’ lives as told in their own words. Saskatoon: Fifth House Publishers.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1928. The Plains Cree language. International Congress of Americanists Proceedings 22(2): 427–431.Google Scholar
Cenerini, Chantale. 2014. Relational Verbs: Paradigm and Practice in a Manitoba Dialect of Swampy Cree. MA thesis, University of Regina.Google Scholar
Cook, Clare. 2008. The Syntax and Semantics of Clause-typing in Plains Cree. PhD dissertation, University of British-Columbia.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3): 626–657.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd, revised edn, Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Donahue, Mark. 1999. Syntactic roles vs. semantic roles: External possession in Tukang Besi. In Payne & Barshi (eds), 373–401.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drapeau, Lynn. 2014. Grammaire de la langue innue. Québec City: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mary. 1961. An Intensive Language Course in Cree, 2nd edn. Ottawa: Laurier Books.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. Douglas. 1971. Cree verb paradigms. International Journal of American Linguistics 37: 76–95.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. âtalôhkâna nêsta tipâcimôwina: Cree Legends and Narratives. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam. 1999. From interest to ownership: A constructional view of external possessors. In Payne & Barshi (eds), 472–503. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1967. The Algonquian Independent Indicative. Contributions to Anthropology Linguistics I [Algonquian]: 66–106.Google Scholar
. 1991. Algonquian linguistic change and reconstruction. Patterns of Change, Change of Patterns: Linguistic Change and Reconstruction Methodology, Philip Baldi (ed.), 55–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Reconstruction and history of the independent indicative. Papers of the 38th Algonquian Conference, H. Christoph Wolfart (ed.), 207–271. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1(1): 5–47.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harbour, Daniel. 2016. Impossible persons. Cambridge MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. External possession in a European areal perspective. In Payne & Barshi (eds), 109–135.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2012. Referential markers and agreement markers in Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 34(4): 468–479.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2014. Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics 24(2): 203–227.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles. 1966. What Algonquian is really like. International Journal of American Linguistics 32(1): 59–73.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horden, John. 1881. A Grammar of the Cree Language, as Spoken by the Cree Indians of North America. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.Google Scholar
Howse, James. 1844. A Grammar of the Cree Language. London: J.G.F. & J. Rivington.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories and non-configurational languages. NLLT 2: 36–76.Google Scholar
Junker, Marie-Odile. 2002. La grammaire des relations: Constructions possessives et obviation en cri de l’Est. CLA Annual Conference Proceedings/Actes du congrès de l’ACL. Sophie Burelle & Stanca Somesfalean (eds).Google Scholar
. 2003. East Cree relational verbs. International Journal of American Linguistics 69(3): 307–329.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Focus, obviation, and word order in East Cree. Lingua 114: 345–365.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Junker, Marie-Odile & Toivonen, Ida. 2015. East Cree ghost participants. Proceedings of LFG15. Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King (eds.). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kâ-Nîpitêhtêw, Jim. 1998. ana kâ-pimwêwêhahk okakêskihkêmowina: The Counselling Speeches of Jim kâ-nîpitêhtêw. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Lacombe, Albert. 1874. Grammaire de la langue des Cris. Montreal: C.O. Beauchemin & Valois.Google Scholar
Lamiroy, Béatrice. 2003. Grammaticalization and external possessor structures in Romance and Germanic languages. In From NP to DP, Vol. 2: The Expression of Possession in Noun Phrases [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 56], Martine Coene & Yves D’hulst (eds), 257–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee-Schoenfeld, Vera. 2006. German possessor datives: Raised and affected. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9: 101–142.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Chao. 2005. On “Possessor raising” in Mandarin Chinese. Proceedings of the Seventeenth North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 203–218.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan & Keizer, Evelien. 1991. On assigning pragmatic functions in English. Pragmatics 1(2):169–215.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minde, Emma. 1997. kwayask ê-kî-pê-kiskinowâpahtihicik: Their Example Showed Me the Way. Edmonton: The University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Mary Catherine. 1996. The situated interpretation of possessor raising. In Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 125–156. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2007. External possession and utterance interpretation: A crosslinguistic exploration. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 45(3): 517–613.Google Scholar
Oxford, Will. 2014. Microparameters of Agreement: A Diachronic Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris & Barshi, Immanuel. 1999. External possession [Typological Studies in Language 39]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pentland, David. 1999. The morphology of the Algonquian independent order. Papers of the 30th Algonquian Conference, David H. Pentland (ed.): 222–266. Winnipeg, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Reinholtz, Charlotte. 1999. On the characterization of discontinuous constituents: Evidence from Swampy Cree. International Journal of American Linguistics 65(2): 201–227.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte. 2011. Old English se: From Demonstrative to Article. A Usage-based Study of Nominal Determination and Category Emergence. PhD dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2011. Aboriginal languages in Canada: Language, 2011 Census of population. <[URL]> (23 May 2017).
Takahashi, Chioko. 1999. Demarcating the left edge of VP in Japanese. ESCOL 15: 227–236.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek. 2013. External possessors and related constructions in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137] J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 155–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. De nominale constituent: Structuur en geschiedenis. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek & Béatrice Lamiroy. 2016. External possessors in West Germanic and Romance: Differential speed in a drift towards NP configurationality. In Aspects of Grammaticalization: (Inter)subjectification, Analogy and (Uni)directionality, Hubert Cuyckens, Daniel Van Olmen & Lobke Ghesquière (eds), 353–399. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfart, H. Christoph. 1973. Plains Cree: A grammatical study. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 63(5): 1–90.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolvengrey, Arok. 2011. Semantic and Pragmatic Functions in Plains Cree Syntax. Utrecht: LOT Publications. (PhD dissertation).Google Scholar
Xu, Yadong. 2016. Feature Competition in Algonquian Agreement. MA thesis, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar