Cover not available
Part of
Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles
Edited by Pierre-Yves Modicom and Olivier Duplâtre
[Studies in Language Companion Series 213] 2020
► pp. 135–160

Chapter 5
Final or medial

Morphosyntactic and functional divergences in discourse particles of the same historical sources

| Fuji Women’s University
| Hokkaido University of Education
Some Japanese final particles find their origins in the same historical sources as interjectional (or medial) particles, with the former occurring in sentence-final position while the latter in sentence-medial position. The two types of particles, though identical in form, are less likely to be used in the same sentence. This study demonstrates that they developed along different pathways and acquired respectively unique discourse-pragmatic functions, mediated by the traits of the positions they occupy in sentences. Our research highlights three discourse-pragmatic functions: information status, addressee-directedness, and speaker gender. We argue that the final and interjectional particles of the same form do not co-occur in a single sentence when they show contrastive features in one of these functions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A brief historical sketch of Japanese interjectional and final particles
  • 3.Morpho-syntactic differences between interjectional and final particles
  • 4.Discourse-pragmatic differences between interjectional and final particles
    • 4.1Information status
    • 4.2Addressee-directedness
    • 4.3Speaker gender
  • 5.Contrastive features of interjectional and final particles
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Keys to abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 4 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.213.05izu
References (57)
References
Abbott, Barbara. 2000. Presuppositions as nonassertions. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10): 1419–1437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asakawa, Tetsuya & Takebe, Ayumi. 2014. Rekishiteki Henka-kara Rikaisuru Gendai Nihongo Bunpoo (Modern Japanese Grammar from the Perspective of Historical Change). Tokyo: Ohfu.Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich (eds.). 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty J. & Ward, Gregory. 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 40]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 25–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafes, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 2006. The acquisition of the particles ne, yo, and no. In The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics, Vol. 2: Japanese, Mineharu Nakayama, Reiko Mazuka & Yasuhiro Shirai (eds), 103–109. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola (eds). 2013. Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2006. Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 403–425. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Same same but different” – Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization. In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds.), 19–45.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134–184. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2015. Japanese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, Shinkichi. 1948. Kokugohoo Kenkyuu (A Study of the Japanese Language Usage). Tokyo: Iwanamishoten.Google Scholar
Iori, Isao, Takanashi, Shino, Nakanishi, Kumiko & Yamada, Toshihiro. 2000. Shokyuu-o Oshieru Hito-no-tameno Nihongo Bunpoo Handobukku (Grammar Handbook for Teachers of Japanese to Beginners). Tokyo: 3A Network.Google Scholar
. 2001. Chuujookyuu-o Oshieru Hito-no-tameno Nihongo Bunpoo Handobukku (Grammar Handbook for Teachers of Japanese to Intermediate and Advanced Learners). Tokyo: 3A Network.Google Scholar
Izuhara, Eiko. 2008. Kantoojoshi shuujoshi-no danwakanri kinoo bunseki (Discourse management analysis of interjectional and sentence-final particles). The Journal of Aichi Gakuin University. Humanities & Sciences 56(1): 67–82.Google Scholar
. 2011. Kantoojoshi-wa donoyooni ichizukeraretekita-ka (How have interjectional particles been positioned?). The Journal of Aichi Gakuin University, Humanities & Sciences 58(3): 1–12.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita. 2013a. From discourse markers to modal/final particles: What the position reveals about the continuum. In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds), 217–235.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Izutsu, Katsunobu. 2013b. Kore-tte hoogendatta-sa: Kyoodoochuui-no kanten-kara mita Hokkaido-hoogen-no shuujoshi “sa” (This is dialect! An analysis of sentence-final particle -sa from the viewpoint of joint attention). Proceedings of the 31st Congress of the Japanese Association of Sociolinguistic Sciences, 78–81. Tokyo: JASS.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1990. Joohoo-no Nawabari Riron: Gengo-no Kinooteki Bunseki (The Theory of Territory of Information: A Functional Analysis of Language). Tokyo: Taishukan Publishing.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 1993. Shuujoshi -yo, -ne (Sentence-final particles -yo and -ne). Gekkan Gengo (Language Monthly) 22(4): 118–121.Google Scholar
Konoshima, Masatoshi. 1966. Kokugo Joshi-no Kenkyuu: Joshishi-no Sobyoo (A Study of Japanese Particles: A Sketch of a History of Particles). Tokyo: Ohfu.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Shige-Yuki. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9: 153–185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Duck-Young. 2007. Involvement and the Japanese interactive particles -ne and -yo. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 363–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi. 1991. Modaritii-no Bunpoo (The Grammar of Modality). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi & Yukinori, Takubo. 1992. Kiso Nihongo Bunpoo (Basic Japanese Grammar), revised edition. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matsumura, Akira (ed.). 1969. Kotengo Gendaigo Joshi Jodooshi Syoosetsu (A Detailed Explanation of Particles and Auxiliaries in Classical and Modern Japanese). Tokyo: Gakutosya.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1971. Nihon Bunpoo Daijiten (A Comprehensive Dictionary of Japanese Grammar). Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 1993. Discourse Modality: Subjectivity, Emotion, and Voice in the Japanese Language [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morita, Emi. 2005. Negotiation of Contingent Talk: The Japanese Interactional Particles ne and sa [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 137]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagasaki, Yasuko. 2012. Dantei Hyoogen-no Tsuujiteki Kenkyuu (A Diachronic Study of Copular Expressions). Tokyo: Musashinoshoin.Google Scholar
NINJAL (National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics). 1951. Gendaigo-no Joshi, Jodooshi: Yoorei-to Jitsurei (Bound Forms (Particles and Auxiliaries) in Modern Japanese: Uses and Examples). Tokyo: Shuei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Nitta, Yoshio. 1982. Joshi (Particles). Nihongo Kyooiku Jiten (The Dictionary of Japanese Language Education), 146–154. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
NKD = Nihon Kokugo Daijiten (Shogakukan Unabridged Dictionary of the Japanese Language). 2000–2002. 14 Vols, 2nd edition. Nihon Kokugo Daijiten Henshuu Iinkai (ed.). Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oe, Motoki. 2015. Hatsuwataido-toiu kanten-kara mita kantoojoshi: Kantoojoshi-no shutsugen-ichi-to hatsuwarensa-ni chakumokushite (Interjectional particles from the viewpoint of utterance attitudes: with special attention to their positions and utterance sequences). Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the Pragmatics Society of Japan, 187–191.Google Scholar
. 2017. Kantoojoshi-no ichizuke-no saikentoo: Shuujoshi-tono hikaku-o tooshite (Reconsideration of interjectional particles in comparison with final particles). Studies in Pragmatics 19: 90–99.Google Scholar
Ogi, Naomi. 2017. Involvement and Attitude in Japanese Discourse: Interactive Markers [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 272]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohso, Mieko. 1986. Goyoo bunseki 1: ‘Kyoo-wa ii tenki-desu-ne’ – ‘Hai, soo-desu’ (Error analysis 1: ‘It’s a nice weather today, isn’t it?’ – ‘Yes, it is.’). Nihongogaku (Japanese Linguistics) 5(9): 91–94.Google Scholar
Ono, Susumu. 1977. Nihongo-no jodooshi-to joshi (Japanese auxiliaries and particles). In Iwanami Kooza 7: Bunpoo II (Iwanami Lecture Series 7: Grammar II), 1–28. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Ono, Susumu, Satake, Akihiro & Maeda, Kingoro (eds). 1990. Iwanami Kogojiten, hoteiban (The Iwanami Classical Japanese Dictionary, revised and enlarged edition). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2004. Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Analysis [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 132]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 1999. Review article, Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents by Knud Lambrecht. Language 75(3): 567–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko. 1990. The role of particles in Japanese gossip. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 315–324. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Takubo, Yukinori & Kinsui, Satoshi. 1997. Discourse management in terms of mental spaces. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 741–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tokieda, Motoki. 1954. Nihonbunpoo: Bungo-hen (Japanese Grammar: Classical Japanese). Tokyo: Iwanamishoten.Google Scholar
Uchio, Kumi. 1973. Joshi-no hensen (Historical changes of particles). In Hinshibetsu Nihonbunpoo Kooza 9: Joshi (Lectures of Japanese Grammar with Specific Reference to Parts of Speech 9: Particles), Kazuhiko Suzuki & Oki Hayashi (eds), 70–106. Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar
Usami, Mayumi (ed.). 2005. BTS-niyoru Tagengo Hanashi Kotoba Koopasu – Nihongo Kaiwa 1: Nihongo Bogowashadooshi-no Kaiwa (Multilingual Corpus of Spoken Language by Basic Transcription System (BTS) – Japanese Conversation 1: Conversations between Native Speakers of Japanese). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Uyeno, Tazuko. 1971. A Study of Japanese Modality: A Performative Analysis of Sentence Particles. PhD dissertation, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Yamada, Toshihiro. 2004. Kokugo Kyooshi-ga Shitteokitai Nihongo Bunpoo (Japanese Grammar that Japanese Teachers Should Know). Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Yamada, Yoshio. 1908. Nihon Bunpooron (A Theory of Japanese Grammar). Tokyo: Hobunkan.Google Scholar
. 1936. Nihon Bunpoogaku Gairon (An Introduction to Japanese Grammar). Tokyo: Hobunkan.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2021. On and off the common ground: Japanese final particles as (un)grounding devices. Lingua Posnaniensis 63:2 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.