Cover not available
Part of
Late Modern English: Novel encounters
Edited by Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg
[Studies in Language Companion Series 214] 2020
► pp. 43–64

The interplay of internal and external factors in varieties of English

| University of Duisburg and Essen
The validity of a division of factors for language change into internal and external forms the focus of the present study. A distinction is made between speaker-internal and speaker-external on the one hand and community-internal and community-external on the other. A central concern is whether such distinctions are merely artefacts of linguistic analysis or whether they reflect the reality of speakers’ linguistic behaviour. Data is considered from varieties of English to show that instances of change are frequently combinations of factors and that the disruption caused by socially-triggered change can be minimised by speakers applying considerations of system symmetry and regularity to a change and thus provide a clear trajectory which can be transmitted across generations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Terminology
    • 1.1The purported reality of the internal – external division
    • 1.2A closer look at internally-motivated and externally-motivated change
    • 1.3Lifespan and the internal – external division
    • 1.4The course of internal and external change
    • 1.5Further differentiation of the internal – external division
  • 2.The speaker-internal and speaker-external distinction
    • 2.1Primarily speaker-internal motivation
      • 2.1.1Grammaticalisation
      • 2.1.2Regularisation
    • 2.2Primarily speaker-external motivation
      • 2.2.1The special case of mergers
        • Merger of which and witch
        • Pre-rhotic mergers
        • Merger of horse and hoarse
        • Merger of merry, Mary, marry
        • The cot – caught merger
    • 2.3The role of prescriptivism
  • 3.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.214.02hic
References (82)
References
Allen, Cynthia. 2016. Typological change: Investigating loss of inflection in early English. In Kytö & Pahta (eds), 444–459.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan. 1993. The grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English. In Milroy & Milroy (eds), 187–213.Google Scholar
. 2004. English in Modern Times 1700–1945. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2008. English dialects in the North of England: Phonology. In Varieties of English, 1: The British Isles, Bernd Kortmann & Clive Upton (eds), 122–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. 2008. English in Canada: Phonology. In Varieties of English, 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, Edgar W. Schneider (ed.), 144–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2010. The English Language in Canada. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burchfield, Robert W. 1994. Introduction. In Burchfield (ed.), 1–19.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1994. The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. V: English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Butters, Ronald R. 2001. Grammatical structure. In Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV: English in North America, John Algeo (ed.), 325–339. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul J. (eds). 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2013. Historical Linguistics, 3rd edn. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700, Vol.1: Survey of the sources, Vol. 2: Phonology, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1993. Internally and externally motivated change in contact situations: Doubts about dichotomy. In Historical Linguistics. Problems and perspectives, Charles Jones (ed.), 131–155. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edwards, Walter F. 2008. African American Vernacular English: Phonology. In Varieties of English, 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, Edgar W. Schneider (ed.), 181–191. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Sharma, Devyani (eds). 2017. The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2006. Morphosyntactic Change. Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, Marinel & Stein, Díeter (eds). 1992. Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gick, Bryan. 2003. Articulatory correlates of ambisyllabicity in English glides and liquids. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI, John Local, Richard Ogden & Rosalind Temple (eds), 222–236. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth. 2010. Describing and complaining: Written evidence of early New Zealand English pronunciation. In Varieties of English in Writing: The Written Word as Linguistic Evidence [Varieties of English Around the World G41], Raymond Hickey, 349–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2008. New York, Philadelphia and other northern cities: Phonology. In Varieties of English, 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, Edgar W. Schneider (ed.), 67–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel & Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds). 2012. The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2002. Internal and external forces again: Word order change in Old English and Old Irish. In Collecting Views on Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.). Special issue of Language Sciences 24(3–4): 261–283.Google Scholar
. 2003a. How do dialects get the features they have? On the process of new dialect formation. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 213–239. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003b. Rectifying a standard deficiency. Pronominal distinctions in varieties of English. In Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 107], Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds), 345–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Dublin English. Evolution and Change [Varieties of English Around the World G35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Irish English. History and Present-day Forms. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Weak segments in Irish English. In Phonological Weakness in English. From Old to Present-Day English, Donka Minkova (ed.), 116–129. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2010. Language contact: Reassessment and reconsideration. In The Handbook of Language Contact, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 1–28. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Internally and externally motivated language change. In Hernández-Campoy & Conde-Silvestre (eds), 401–421.Google Scholar
. 2013. Supraregionalisation and dissociation. Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd edn, Jack K. Chambers and Natalie Schilling (eds), 537–554. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014a. Mergers, losses and the spread of English. In Developments in English: Expanding Electronic Evidence, Irma Taavitsainen, Merja Kytö, Claudia Claridge & Jeremy J. Smith (eds), 237–250. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. Vowels before /r/ in the history of English. In Contact, Variation and Change in the History of English, Daniel Schreier [Studies in Language Companion Series 159], Olga Timofeeva, Anne Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja & Simone Pfenninger (eds), 95–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2015. The North of England and Northern English. In Researching Northern English [Varieties of English Around the World G55], Raymond Hickey (ed.), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2003. Motives for Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ihalainen, Ossi. 1994. The dialects of England since 1776. In Burchfield (ed.), 197–274.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian. 2012. Lexical diffusion and the regular transmission of language change in its sociohistorical context. In Hernández-Campoy & Conde-Silvestre (eds), 408–426.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1995. The phonological basis of sound change. The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith (ed.), 640–670. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 2012. Typology and typological change in English historical linguistics. In Nevalainen & Traugott (eds), 605–621.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1971. Mourning and Morning. In Williamson & Burke (eds), 417–423.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja & Pahta, Päivi (eds). 2016. The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mari & Singh, Ishtla. 2005. Exploring Language Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Mari C. & Esch, Edith (eds). 2002. Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-Linguistic Factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol.1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2006 [1966]. The Social Stratification of English in New York City, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi (ed.). 2000. Analogy, Levelling, Markedness. Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger & Wright, Susan. 1986. Endogeny vs. contact: “Afrikaans influence” on South African English. English World-Wide 7: 201–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2003. Grammaticalization: Cause or effect? In Hickey (ed.), 99–123.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2015. A Historical Syntax of English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 1996. Language contact, transmission, shift: South African Indian English. In Focus on South Africa [Varieties of English Around the World G15], Vivian de Klerk (ed.), 79–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Endogeny versus contact revisited: Aspectual busy in South African English. In Collecting Views on Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.). Special issue of Language Sciences 24(3–4): 345–358.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim. 1993. The grammar of Scottish English. In Milroy & Milroy (eds), 99–138.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2003. On the role of the speaker in language change. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 143–157. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Sociolinguistics and ideologies in language history. In Hernández-Campoy & Conde-Silvestre (eds), 571–584.Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley (eds). 1993. Real English. The Grammar of the English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and Social Networks, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 2001. British and Irish antecedents. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. VI: English in North America, John Algeo (ed.), 86–153. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds). 2012. The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2016. Historical Sociolinguistics. Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England, 2nd edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Federick J. 2003. Formal and functional motivation for language change. In Hickey (ed.), 18–36.Google Scholar
Pargman, Sheri. 2002. Internal and External Factors in Language Change. Chicago IL: University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Percy, Carol. 2012. Attitudes, prescriptivism, and standardisation. In Nevalainen & Traugott (eds), 446–456.Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty S. 2001. Lexical diffusion, lexical frequency, and lexical analysis. In Bybee & Hopper (eds), 123–136.Google Scholar
2006. Word Frequency and Lexical Diffusion. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Lexical diffusion in historical phonology. In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Roberge, Paul. 2012. The teleology of change: Functional and non-functional explanations for language varieties and change. In Hernández-Campoy & Conde-Silvestre (eds), 369–386.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1972. A History of English Syntax. A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1990. The Dialects of England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1998. Third-person singular zero: African American Vernacular English, East Anglian dialects and Spanish persecution in the Low Countries. Folia Linguistica Historica 18(1–2): 139–148.Google Scholar
. 2004. New Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Turner, Lorenzo D. 1971. Notes on the sounds and vocabulary of Gullah. In Williamson & Burke (eds), 121–35.Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Juanita V. & Burke, Virginia M. (eds). 1971. A Various Language. Perspectives on American Dialects. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2005. Contact-induced changes: Classification and processes. Diachronica 22 (2): 373–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Substrate influence and universals in the emergence of contact Englishes: Re-evaluating the evidence. In English as a Contact Language, Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds), 222–241. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Thomas, Erik R. 2002. The Development of African American English. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2013. American English. Dialects and Variation, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles D. 2000. Internal and external forces in language change. Language Variation and Change 12: 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Salameh Jiménez, Shima
2024. Chapter 1. Linguistic change in the 20th century. In Language Change in the 20th Century [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 340], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Needle, Jeremy M. & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2022. Orderly obsolescence. American Speech ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. References. In Sounds of English Worldwide, ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.