Part of
Late Modern English: Novel encounters
Edited by Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg
[Studies in Language Companion Series 214] 2020
► pp. 91116
Austin, Frances O.
1985Relative which in late 18th-century usage: The Clift family correspondence. In Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics: Amsterdam, 10–13 April 1985 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 41], Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem F. Koopman & Frederike van der Leek (eds), 15–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
2014The Syntax of Comparative Constructions: Operators, Ellipsis Phenomena and Functional Left Peripheries. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
2018Deletion Phenomena in Comparative Constructions: English Comparatives in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Catherine N.
1996A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English. Language Variation and Change 8(2): 227–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandner, Ellen & Bräuning, Iris
2013The particle wo in Alemannic: Only a complementizer? Linguistische Berichte 234: 131–169.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
1973The syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3): 275–343.Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert Ferdinand Marie
1997 Much-support as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 28(1): 119–164.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier
1984Relativizers in Early Modern English: A dynamic quantitative study. In Historical Syntax, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 61–88. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg
2004Zur Typologie der Relativsätze in den Dialekten des Deutschen. In Morphologie und Syntax deutscher Dialekte und historische Dialektologie des Deutschen, Franz Patocka & Peter Wiesinger (eds), 60–83. Vienna: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2004Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Renewal in the left periphery: Economy and the complementiser layer. Transactions of the Philological Society 107(2): 131–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Tanja
2002Relative Clauses in Dialects of English: A Typological Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Freiburg.Google Scholar
2005Relative clauses in English dialects of the British Isles. In A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects: Agreement, Gender, Relative Clauses, Bernd Kortmann (ed.), 21–124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard
1977Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1): 63–99.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
2008 Alls, a relative pronoun? Nordic Journal of English Studies 7(2): 69–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
1997Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Wagner, Susanne
2007A fresh look at Late Modern English dialect syntax. In “Of varying language and opposing creed”: New Insights into Late Modern English, Javier Pérez-Guerra (ed.), 279–300. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Johansson, Christine
2012Relativization. In English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. I, Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds), 776–790. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lechner, Winfried
1999Comparatives and DP-structures. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
2004Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lezcano, Emma
1996The choice of relativizers in Early Modern English: Evidence from the Helsinki Corpus. SEDERI 7: 57–66.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Méndez-Naya, Belén
2014On comparative complementizers in English: Evidence from historical corpora. In Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain, Nila Méndez-Naya Vazques (ed.), 311–333. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie
1998Verallgemeinernde Relativsätze im Althochdeutschen. In Deutsche Grammatik – Thema in Variationen. Festschrift für Hans-Werner Eroms zum 60. Geburtstag, Karin Donhauser & Ludwig Eichinger (eds), 263–281. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim
1993The grammar of Scottish English. In Real English, James Milroy & Lesley Milroy (eds), 99–138. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael & Bailey, Guy
1991 In which: A new form in written English. American Speech 66: 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mossé, Fernand
1991A Handbook of Middle English. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
2002The rise of the relative who in Early Modern English. In Relativisation on the North Sea Littoral, Patricia Poussa (ed.), 109–121. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1920Deutsche Grammatik, Band 3: Syntax. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1984The choice of relative pronouns in 17th century American English. In Historical Syntax, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 417–436. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991On the history of that/zero as object clause in links in English. In English Corpus Linguistics, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 272–289. New York NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1982Socio-Historical Linguistics: Its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, Smith, Jennifer & Lawrence, Helen
2005No taming the vernacular! Insights from the relatives in northern Britain. Language Variation and Change 17: 75–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2010Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization, [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
Bacskai‐Atkari, Julia
2024. Subject‐Object Asymmetries and the Development of Relative Clauses between Late Middle English and Early Modern English. Transactions of the Philological Society DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.