Cover not available
Part of
Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions: Categories, co-text, and context
Edited by Pascal Hohaus and Rainer Schulze
[Studies in Language Companion Series 216] 2020
► pp. 141–172

Chapter 6
Conditionals, modality, and Schrödinger’s cat

Conditionals as a family of linguistic qubits

| Edge Hill University
An intriguing characteristic of conditionals is that they are modally dense constructions, without being modal markers themselves. This chapter will examine the modal nature of conditionals through the lens of construction grammar. It will be argued that the main utility of conditionals does not lie in pairing conditions with consequents, nor in establishing the factuality or actualisation of conditions and consequents, but in leaving issues of factuality or actualisation unresolved. The chapter proposes that conditional constructions are better regarded as environments of indeterminacy, in that they modalise what is communicated through them. More precisely it will be argued that conditionals can be usefully treated as the linguistic equivalent of quantum bits (qubits). The chapter will also discuss the characteristics that define the family of conditional constructions, and those differentiating between family members.
Keywords: conditionals, modality, corpus linguistics, construction grammar, qubits
Article outline
  • 1.Motivation and aims
  • 2.The modal nature of conditionals: Considerations
  • 3.Conditionals as linguistic qubits
  • 4.Conditionals as qubits: Their function in discourse
    • 4.1Classification of conditionals
    • 4.2DIR-LK inferential conditionals
    • 4.3 DIR and IND rhetorical conditionals
    • 4.4 DIR-LK polar conditionals
    • 4.5DIR-DN
    • 4.6DIR-DD
    • 4.7IND pretext conditionals
    • 4.8 Conditionals without apodosis
  • 5.Defining the family of conditional constructions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.216.06gab
References (67)
References
Bergs, Alexander. 2008. Shall and shan’t in contemporary English. In Constructional Approaches to English Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Nick Gisborne (eds), 113–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Edward, Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C.. 2013 Cognitive Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdal (eds), 233–253. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian & Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2015. The syntax-lexicon discontinuum: A blasphemous notion in Construction Grammar? Paper presented at Construction Grammar between Morphology and Syntax , 22 June 2015, Gent, Belgium.
Channell, Joanne. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1986. Conditionals: A typology. In On Conditionals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly &Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 77–99. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Allan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1986. Varieties of conditional sentences. In Proceedings of the third Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Ann Miller & Zheng-sheng Zhang (eds), 163–182. Columbus OH: Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
1990. Epistemic stance and grammatical form in English conditional sentences. Papers from the Twenty-sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , Vol. 1, The Main Session, 137–162.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1998. The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”. In General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 13-15 1998, Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds), 35–55. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 64(3), 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortuin, Egbert & Boogaart, Ronny. 2009. Imperative as conditional: From constructional to compositional semantics. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(4): 641–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola. 2004. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language 2], Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), 11–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Seiko. 2004. Lexically unfilled constructional schemes and construction types: The case of Japanese modal conditional constructions. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language 2], Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds), 121–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2003. Conditional sentences: ELT typology and corpus evidence. Presented at 36th Annual BAAL Meeting, University of Leeds, UK, 4–6 September 2003.
. 2005. Elliptical and discontinuous if-conditionals: Co-text, context, inference and intuitions. Presented at Corpus Linguistics 2005, University of Birmingham, 15-17 July 2005.
. 2006. Corpus-based evaluation of pedagogical materials: If-conditionals in ELT coursebooks and the BNC. Presented at 7th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Paris, France, 1–4 July 2006.
. 2007. If-conditionals as modal colligations: A corpus-based investigation. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference: Corpus Linguistics 2007, Mark Davies, Paul Rayson, Susan Hunston & Pernilla Danielsson (eds). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
. 2010. A Corpus-based Examination of English if-conditionals through the Lens of Modality: Nature and Types. PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
. 2011a. If-conditionals and modality: A corpus-based investigation. Presented at Corpus Linguistics 2011, Birmingham, UK, 20–22 July 2011.
. 2011b. Construction Grammar vs. Lexical Grammar: A case study of the modal load in if-conditionals. Presented at International Symposium on the Sociology of Words: Lexical Meaning, Combinatorial Potential and Computational Implementation , Murcia, Spain, 1–2 December 2011.
. 2013. Using corpus analysis to compare the explanatory power of linguistic theories: A case study of the modal load in if-conditionals. Presented at Corpus Linguistics 2013, Lancaster University, 23–26 July 2013.
. 2019. If-conditionals and modality: Frequency patterns and theoretical explanations. Journal of English Linguistics 47(4): 301–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. forthcoming. If-conditionals: Corpus-based classification and frequency distribution. In Digital Humanities Beyond the Basics, Stefania Maci (ed.). Bern: Peter Lang.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adelle E. 2013. Constructionist Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 15–31. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele & Jackendoff, Ray. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3): 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele & Casenhiser, Devin. 2006. English constructions. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 343–355. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1983. Paratactic if-clauses. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 263–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2010. What can synchronic gradience tell us about reanalysis? Verb-first conditionals in written German and Swedish. In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 181–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollmann, Willem & Siewierska, Anna. 2006. Corpora and the need for other methods in a study of Lancashire dialect. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54: 203–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoye, Leo. 1997. Adverbs and Modality in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Rod. 2008. Word Grammar and Construction Grammar. In Constructional Approaches to English Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Nick Gisborne (eds), 257–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Smith, Sara W. & Lüdge, Tanja. 2003. Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(12), 1737–1769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keshet, Ezra. 2013. Focus on conditional conjunction. Journal of Semantics 30, 211–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2002. The notional category of modality. In Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings, Paul Portner & Barbara H. Partee (eds), 289–323. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2004. Meaning and the English Verb, 3rd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Michael A. & Chuang, Isaac L. 2010. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic Modality. Language, and Conceptualisation: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective [Human Cognitive Processing 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamims. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1987. The English Verb, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1990. Modality and the English Modals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael R. 1983. Modal Expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1935. Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The present situation in quantum mechanics). Naturwissenschaften 23(48): 807–812. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimony, Abner. 1992. Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. In The New Physics, Paul Davies (ed.), 373–395. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sinclair John McHardy. 1996. The search for units of meaning. Textus 9(1): 75–106.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McHardy. 2004. Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stapp, Henry P. 1993. Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thumm, Markus. 2000. The contextualization of paratactic conditionals. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 20: 1–39.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trimmer, John D. 1980. The present situation in Quantum Mechanics: A translation of Schrodinger's "cat paradox" paper. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124: 323–338.Google Scholar
Turner, Ken. 2003. On neo- and post- Gricean conditionals. International Journal of Pragmatics 14: 135–154.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul. 1997. Conditionality as cognitive distance. In On Conditionals Again [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 143], Angeliki Athanasiadou & Rene Dirven (eds), 97–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Chunyan & Fontaine, Lise. 2020. A functional approach to OM-constructions. Lingua, 242, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Gabrielatos, Costas
2021.  If-conditionals: Corpus-based classification and frequency distribution. ICAME Journal 45:1 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.