Cover not available
Part of
Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions: Categories, co-text, and context
Edited by Pascal Hohaus and Rainer Schulze
[Studies in Language Companion Series 216] 2020
► pp. 173–194

Chapter 7
Modal marking in conditionals. Grammar, usage and discourse

| Tohoku University
This paper investigates modal marking in conditionals with respect to two research questions: (1) How tightly integrated are conditional sentences, both relative to similar adverbial clause constructions, and with respect to different variants of conditional constructions. (2) What are the pragmatic biases and discursive patterns, if any, that motivate conditional constructions with modal marking. These issues are investigated with the help of a large corpus of Modern Japanese. The data suggest that (1) conditional sentences are relatively tightly integrated compared to causal, and probably also concessive constructions, but there are considerable differences between different types of conditional constructions, and (2) modally marked conditional sentences are overwhelmingly associated with deontic speech acts. A number of discursive patterns associated with spoken language can be identified, some of which are probably cross-linguistically replicable.
Keywords: conditional clauses, modality, Japanese, discourse patterns, speech acts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Modality and conditional clauses
  • 3.Observations and findings in previous research
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1Overall results
    • 4.2 Pragmatic biases of conditionals with modal marking in the protasis
    • 4.3Patterns of usage
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Lists of abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.216.07nar
References (33)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2015. Strong modality and truth disposability in syntactic subordination: What is the locus of the phase edge validating modal adverbials? Studia Linguistica 69(2): 119–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1986. Conditionals are discourse-bound. In On Conditonals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 333–351. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arita, Setsuko. 2020. Jōkentsuki meirei, iraibun – nihongo jōkenbun no modariti seiyaku saikō (Imperatives and demands with conditions – rethinking on modality in Japanese conditional sentences). In Deeta ni motoduku nihongo no modariti kenkyū (Data-based Research on Japanese Modality), Yukinori Takubo & Hisashi Noda (eds), 143–162. Tokyo: KuroshioGoogle Scholar
Baumann, Carolin. 2017. Bedeutung und Gebrauch der deutschen Modalverben. Lexikalische Einheit als Basis kontextueller Vielheit. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne. 2014. The development of conditional should in English. In Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface, Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds), 293–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brünner, Gisela. 1983. Modalverben in schlusstragenden Konstruktionen. In Studien zur Verwendung der Modalverben, Gisela Brünner & Angelika Redder (eds), 165–225. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bussmann, Hadumod. 1996. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco. 2009. Deutsche Modalpartikeln in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. In Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 191–221. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Dufaye, Lionel. 2018. SHOULD in conditional clauses: When epistemicity meets appreciative modality. In Epistemic Modalities and Evidentiality in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), 52–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ezoe, Michiko. 2003. Nihongo no jōken hyōgen no tsukaiwake (Differences in usage between the Japanese conditional expressions). JCLA 3: 127–137.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1988. Illocution, mood and modality in a functional grammar of Spanish. Journal of Semantics 6: 227–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Thompson Geoff. 2000. Introduction to Channell, Joanna “Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis”. In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds), 38–39. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese [London Oriental and African Language Library 17], rev. edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Yuki. 2003. Modality and the Japanese Language. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi. 1993. Jōken hyōgen to bun no gainen reberu (Conditional expressions and the conceptual level of the clause). In Nihongo no jōken hyōgen, Takashi Masuoka (ed.), 23–39. Tōkyō: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
. 2000. Jōken hyōgen saikō (Rethinking conditional expressions). In Nihongo bunpō no shosō (Aspects of Japanese Grammar), 153–175. Tōkyō: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
Minami, Fujio 1974. Gendai Nihongo no Kōzō (The Structure of Modern Japanese). Tōkyō: Taishūkan shoten.Google Scholar
. 1993. Gendai nihongo bunpō no rinkaku (Outline of Modern Japanese Grammar). Tōkyō: Taishūkan shoten.Google Scholar
Morita, Yoshiyuki. 2002. Nihongo bunpō no hassō (The concepts of Japanese Grammar). Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Topic phrases in conditional and in causal clauses - Evidence for different degrees of clause integration. Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 20: 143–162.Google Scholar
. 2020. The scope of modal categories - An empirical study. In Re-assessing Modalising Expressions. Categories, Co-text, and Context [Studies in Language Companion Series 216]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1994. Diachrony of clause linkage. TE and BA in Old through Middle Japanese. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 135–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rickmeyer, Jens. 1995. Japanische Morphosyntax. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sztencel, Magdalena & Duffy, Sarah E. 2019. Reporting conditionals with modals. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World’s Languages, Alessandro Capone, Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & Allesandra Falzone (eds), 201–226. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroshi. 1994. Jōken hyōgen to kihon bunkei (Conditional Expressions and Basic Clause Patterns). Nihongogaku 13(8): 60–72.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Mie. 2004. Nihongo no setsu, bun no rensetsu to modariti (Modality and the Connection between Clauses and Sentences in Japanese). Tōkyō: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamaoka, Masanori. 1995. Jūzokusetsu no modariti (Modality in subordinate clauses). In Fukubun no kenkyū, Vol. 2, Yoshio Nitta (ed.), 309–326. Tōkyō: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
Zvolenszky, Zsofia. 2006. A semantic constraint on the logic of modal conditionals. In Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Logic and Language, Besenyőtelek, Hungary, August 24–26, 2006 (LoLa 9), Gyuris Beáta (ed.), 167–177. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar