Anderwald, Lieselotte
2014The decline of the be-perfect, linguistic relativity, and grammar writing in the nineteenth century. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt (ed.), 13–27. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Language between Description and Prescription. Verbs and Verb Categories in Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Oxford: OUP. DOI logo
Brinton, Laurel J
1994The differentiation of statives and perfects in Early Modern English: The development of the conclusive perfect. In Towards a Standard English, 1600–1800, Dieter Stein & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds), 135–170. Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Britain, David
2012Innovation diffusion in sociohistorical linguistics. In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, Juan Manuel Herández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), 451–464. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2010Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Denison, David
1993English Historical Syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Hilpert, Martin
2008The identification of stages in diachronic data: variability-based neighbor clustering. Corpora 3 (1): 59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Variability-based neighbor clustering. A bottom-up approach to periodization in historical linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of The History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 134–144. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hernández, Nuria
2006User’s Guide to FRED (Freiburg Corpus of English Dialects). Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt & Zeileis, Achim
2006Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15: 651–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Judith
2019Counterfactuality and aktionsart. Predictors for BE vs. HAVE + past participle in Middle English. In Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 346], Claudia Claridge & Birte Bös (eds), 149–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Magnus
2007The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674–1834. Evaluating and annotating a corpus of 18th- and 19th-century spoken English. In Annotating Variation and Change [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1], Anneli Meurman-Solin and Arja Nurmi (eds). Helsinki: University of Helsinki. <> (6 November 2020).Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2004The passival and the progressive passive - A case study of layering in the English aspect and voice systems. In Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalisation in English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13], Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair (eds), 79–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014The demise of the being to V construction. Transactions of the Philological Society 112 (2): 167–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016aError, feature, (incipient) change - Or something else altogether? On the role of low-frequency deviant patterns for the description of Englishes. In World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations [Varieties of English around the World G57], Elena Seoane & Cristina Suárez-Gómez (eds), 37–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bWho is the/a/ø professor at your university? A construction-grammar view on changing article use with single role predicates in American English. In Corpus Linguistics on the Move: Exploring and Understanding English Through Corpora, María José López Couso, Belèn Méndez Naya & Ignacio Palacios Martínez (eds), 227–258. Amsterdam: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018It is time that this (should) be studied across a broader range of Englishes: A global trip around mandative subjunctives. In Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the Interplay of Emancipation and Globalization of ESL Varieties [Varieties of English around the World G61], Sandra Dehors (ed.), 217–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Jespersen, Otto
1931A Modern Grammar on Historical Principles, Part IV, Vol 3: Syntax. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja
1997 Be/Have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English. In English in Transition: Corpus-based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles, Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkone (eds), 16–85. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2015A Historical Syntax of English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas & Alexiadou, Artemis
2006Auxiliary selection and counterfactuality in the history of English and Germanic. In Comparative Studies in Germanic Syntax: From Afrikaans to Zurich German [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 97], Jutta M. Hartmann & László Molnárfi (eds), 237–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Perfects, resultatives, and auxiliaries in Earlier English. Linguistic Inquiry 41 (3): 389–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2017On the disappearance of the BE perfect in Late Modern English. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49 (2): 159–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F
1960A Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
2003Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2002Women’s writings as evidence for linguistic continuity and change in Early Modern English. In Alternative Histories of English, Richard Watts & Peter Trudgill (eds), 191–209. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Perek, Florent & Hilpert, Martin
2017A distributional semantic approach to the periodization of change in the productivity of constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22 (4): 490–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2016R: A Language and Environment for Statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]> (6 November 2020).Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte
2014Auxiliary Selection in Spanish. Gradience, Gradualness and Conservatism [Studies in Language Companion Series 155]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rydén, Mats & Brorström, Sverker
1987The Be/Have Variation with Intransitives in English. With Special Reference to the Late Modern Period. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Rydén, Mats
1991The be/have variation in its crucial phases. In Historical English Syntax, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 343–354. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena & Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
Smith, K. Aaron
2007Language use and auxiliary selection in the perfect. In Split Auxiliary Systems: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 69], Raúl Aranovich (ed.), 255–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella
2000Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76 (4): 859–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Malley, James & Tutz, Gerhard
2009Introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging and random forests. Psychological Methods 14 (4): 323–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Hothorn, Torsten & Zeileis, Achim
2009Party on! A new, conditional variable-important measure for random forests available in the party package. The R Journal 1 (2): 14–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Baayen, Harald
2012Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24: 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1973An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part 3, Second Half: Syntactical Units with Two or More Verbs. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin
2016Rise of the undead? BE-perfects in World Englishes. In Re-assessing the Present Perfect. Corpus Studies and Beyond, Valentin Werner, Elena Seoane & Cristina Suárez Gómez (eds), 259–294. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yerastov, Yuri
2015A construction grammar analysis of the transitive be perfect in present-day Canadian English. English Language and Linguistics 19 (1): 157–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar