Cover not available
Part of
Lost in Change: Causes and processes in the loss of grammatical elements and constructions
Edited by Svenja Kranich and Tine Breban
[Studies in Language Companion Series 218] 2021
► pp. 333–362

Loss of object indexation in verbal paradigms of Koĩc (Tibeto-Burman, Nepal)

Loss of object indexation in verbal paradigms of Koĩc (Tibeto-Burman, Nepal)

Editor
 | Karl-Franzens Universität, Graz
Koĩc ([kɔĩts]; English: Sunwar) is a Kiranti language spoken in eastern Nepal. In the past, Koĩc had a biactantial indexing system with transitive verbs indexing subjects and objects, a typical feature of Kiranti languages. In modern Koĩc, transitive verbs are not indexed for object. A comparison shows connections in form and function between old and new argument indexes. Now Koĩc has a system of different conjugations, and for the majority of verbs membership in a conjugation is lexically fixed.
Most speakers of Koĩc are bilingual with Nepali (Indo-Iranian), and the longstanding Nepali influence will be discussed as one possible cause of language change.
Keywords: Kiranti language, transitivity, finiteness, person indexation, participle
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Overview
    • 1.2Koĩc, a Kiranti language
    • 1.3The sociolinguistic situation
    • 1.4Literature about Koĩc person and number indexes
  • 2.Person and number indexes in Koĩc
    • 2.1Biactantial indexing
    • 2.2Subject and object indexes (Genetti 1988)
    • 2.3Subject indexing in modern Koĩc (Borchers 2008a)
    • 2.4The former and the current system of indexing arguments
  • 3.Person and number indexes - Additional data
    • 3.1 Konow (1909), Bieri & Schulze (1973) and Rapacha (2005)
    • 3.2Linguistic Survey of India (Konow 1909)
    • 3.3Subject and object indexes (Bieri & Schulze 1973)
    • 3.4Subject indexing in modern Koĩc (Rapacha 2005)
    • 3.5More data – Better explanations?
  • 4.Loss of morphology – Language change
  • 5.Summary
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 16 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.218.11bor
References (29)
References
Bieri, Dora, Schulze, Marlene & Hale, Austin. 1973. An approach to Sunwar discourse. In Clause, Sentence, and Discourse Patterns in Selected Languages of Nepal, Austin Hale (ed.), 433–462. Norman OK: Summer Institute of the University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Borchers, Dörte. 2008a. A Grammar of Sunwar. Descriptive Grammar, Paradigms, Texts and Glossary [Languages of the greater Himalayan region 5.7]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2008b. Surelgāũko surelbhāṣā (The Surel language in the village of Suri). Sirmī 7 (6): 63.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics. 2012. National Population and Housing Census 2011. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.Google Scholar
Commissioner for Linguistic Minorities. 2011. 48th Report of the Commissioner for Linguistic Minorities in India (July 2010 to June 2011). Allahabad: Ministry of Minority Affairs, Government of India. <http://nclm.nic.in/shared/linkimages/nclm48threport.pdf> (14 April 2017).Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2011. “Optional” “ergativity” in Tibeto-Burman languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34 (2): 9–20.Google Scholar
. 2014. Creolization in the divergence of the Tibeto-Burman languages. In Trans-Himalayan Linguistics. Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 266], Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan Hill (eds), 41–68. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 1991. Bahing and the Proto-Kiranti verb. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies LIV(2): 336–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egli, Werner M. 1999. Bier für die Ahnen. Erbrecht, Tausch und Ritual bei den Sunuwar Ostnepals. Frankfurt: Verlag für Interkulturelle Kommunikation (IKO).
Genetti, Carol. 1988. Notes on the structure of the Sunwari transitive verb. Linguistics in the Tibeto-Burman Area 11 (2): 62–92.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian Houghton. 1858. Comparative vocabulary of the languages of the broken Tribes of Nepál. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal XXVII: 393–456.
Jacques, Guillaume, Lahaussois, Aimée, Michailovsky, Boyd & Bahadur Rai, Dhan. 2012. An overview of Khaling verbal morphology. Language and Linguistics 13(6): 1095–1170. <[URL]> (3 October 2019).Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change [Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konow, Stan. 1909. Sunwār or Sunuwār. In Linguistic Survey of India, Vol. III: Tibeto-Burman Family, Part I: General Introduction, Specimens of the Tibetan Dialects, the Himalayan Dialects, and the North Assam Group, George Abraham Grierson (ed.), 198–205. Calcutta (Kolkata): Superintendent of Government Printing, India. <[URL]> (18 March 2019).
Kusters, Wouter. 2003. Linguistic Complexity. The Influence of Social Change on Verbal Inflection. Utrecht: LOT. <[URL]> (12 October 2019).Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language Contact [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1975. Notes on the Kiranti verb (East Nepal). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area II (2): 183–218.Google Scholar
. 1988. La Langue Hayu. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
. 2003. Hayu. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages [Routledge Language Family Series], Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 518–532. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2017. Kiranti Languages. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2 edn. [Routledge Language Family Series], Randy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), 646–679. Oxford & New York: Routledge. halshs-01705023. <[URL]> (19 August 2019).Google Scholar
Rapacha, Lal. 1996. Sunwar Language. A Sociolinguistic Profile. MA thesis, Central Department of English, Kirtipur.Google Scholar
. 2005. A Descriptive Grammar of Kirānti-Kõits. PhD dissertation. Jawaharlal Nehru University.
. 2009. Vanishing Ethnicity, Cultures and Languages of Nepal. Kathmandu: Institute of Kirantology.Google Scholar
. 2020. Kirā̃nti-Kõits (Sunuwār/Mukhiyā) Pahicān tathā bhāṣā-sāhityako aitihāsik sarbhekṣaṇ (A Historical Survey of Kiranti-Koits (Sunwar/Mukhiya) Identity and Language-Literature). Kathmandu: Kirā̃nti vijñān adhyayan sãsthān.
Shneiderman, Sara & Turin, Mark. 2006. Seeking the tribe. Ethno-politics in Darjeeling and Sikkim. Himal Southasian, March-April 2006: 54–58. <[URL]> (19 August 2019).Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language Contact and Change. Spanish in Los Angeles [Oxford Studies in Language Contact]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Thomason, Sara G. & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans. 2000. A General and Unified Theory of the Language Transmission Process in Language Contact [Monographien zur Sprachwissenschaft 19]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Without Author. 2011. The Word of God. The Holy Bible Sunuwar. Kathmandu: Wycliffe Inc. & Ekta Books Distributors. <[URL]> (29 September 2019).Google Scholar