Aijmer, Karin
2002English Discourse Particles. Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcázar, Asler
2017A syntactic analysis of rhetorical questions. In Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K. McCarvel & Edward J. Rubin (eds), 32–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Álvarez González, Albert
2019From discourse to syntax: The use of the discourse marker bwe in the creation of interclausal connectives in Yaqui. In Diverse Scenarios of Syntactic Complexity [Typological Studies in Language 126], Albert Álvarez González, Zarina Estrada-Fernández & Claudine Chamoreau (eds), 217–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2008Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies 1(1):5–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan, Burbano Elizondo, Lourdes & Llamas, Carmen
2012Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teeside. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich
(eds) 2014Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
2002Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, Hornstein, Norbert & Nunes, Jairo
2010Control as Movement. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Patrick, Trawiński, Beata & Wollstein, Angelika
2016(Anti-)Control in German: Evidence from comparative, corpus- and psycholinguistic studies. In Co- and Subordination in German and other Languages, Ingo Reich & Augustin Speyer (eds), 77–98. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
2017The Development of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
1987Politeness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82: 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola
(eds) 2013Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline
Dik, Simon C.
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1987The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Discourse and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 47–87. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo
2010Omen bariazioan. In Euskara eta euskarak: Aldakortasun sintaktikoa aztergai, Beatriz Fernández, Pablo Albizu & Ricardo Etxepare (eds). Vitoria-Gasteiz: University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo & Uria, Larraitz
2016Microsyntactic variation in the Basque hearsay evidential. In Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque [Language Faculty and Beyond 13], Beatriz Fernández & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds), 265–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka F.
2017Going beyond the prototypical: Special interrogatives and special declaratives. Paper presented at the Stanford Colloquium, 8 December 2017.
Fischer, Kerstin
(ed.) 2006Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Foolen, Ad
2015Expressives. In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, Nick Riemer (ed.), 473–490. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1999What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 3(7): 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015The combining of discourse markers – A beginning. Journal of Pragmatics 86: 48–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garmendia, Joana
2014A pragmatic analysis of the Basque particle ote . In Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspects of Speech Actions, Iwona Witczak Plisiecka (ed.), 97–166. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef
2000The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje
(eds) 2015Final Particles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2013Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences 54: 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Spontaneous Spoken English. An Integrated Approach to the Emergent Grammar of Speech. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics 146: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander & Kaltenböck, Gunther
(eds) 2020Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic Models of Language Structure and Language Processing [Human Cognitive Processing 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2013On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2007The Genesis of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, B.
2019Some observations on the dualistic nature of discourse processing. Folia Linguistica 53(2): 411–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping
2017Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics 55(4): 813–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania, & Long, Haiping
2020Dual process frameworks on reasoning and linguistic discourse. A comparison. In Haselow & Kaltenböck (eds), 59–89.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002Language Description: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Smith, Sara W.
1998And people just you know like ‘wow’ – Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In Discourse Markers. Theory and Descriptions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korta Carrión, Kepa & Zubeldia Arruabarrena, Larraiz
2016Bide partikula: Eduki doxastikoa eta ebidentziala. Gogoa 15: 11–29.Google Scholar
Koyanagi, Tomokazu
2018Research on Grammatical Change Tokyo: Kuroshio. (In Japanese).Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2000Elements of Control. Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
2003Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn [Classics in Linguistics 1]. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehman Blake, Margaret
2006Clinical relevance of discourse characteristics after right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 15(3): 255–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenk, Uta
1998Marking Discourse Coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1988Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3): 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marini, Andrea
2012Characteristics of narrative discourse processing after damage to the right hemisphere. Seminars in Speech and Language 33(1): 68–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marini, Andrea, Carlomagno, Sergio, Caltagirone, Carlo & Nocentini, Ugo
2005The role played by the right hemisphere in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language 93: 46–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monforte, Sergio
2018aAbout the particle al in basque. In Novas Perspectivas na Lingüística Aplicada, Marta Díaz Ferro, Jorge Diz Ferreira, Ania Pérez Pérez & Ana Varela Suárez (eds), 19–31. Lugo: Editorial Axac.Google Scholar
2018bQuestion particles in basque. Isogloss. A Journal on Variation of Romance and Iberian Languages 4(1): 29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Penelope S.
1999Right Hemisphere Damage: Disorders of Communication and Cognition. San Diego CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Prat, Chantel S., Long, Debra L. & Baynes, Kathleen
2007The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: An individual differences investigation. Brain and Language 100(3): 283–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Seongha
2012Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: The case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles. Language Sciences 34(3): 284–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016From quoting to reporting to stance-marking: Rhetorical strategies and intersubjectification of reportative. Language Sciences 55: 36–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
1985Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, Sue & Bryan, Karen
2012Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25(4): 213–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2018From the inside to the outside of the sentence: Forming a larger discourse unit with jijitsu ‘fact’ in Japanese. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 202], Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José V. Lozano (eds), 333–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Susan
2005Cognitive realization markers in Korean: A discourse-pragmatic study of the sentence-ending particles -kwun, -ney and -tela . Language Sciences 27(4): 437–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Suzuki, Ryoko
2011The grammaticalization of final particles. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1997The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the ICHL XII, Manchester, UK.
2015Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective. Linguistics Vanguard 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(1): 26–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Monforte, Sergio
van Dijk, Teun A.
1972Some Aspects of Text Grammars. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
2006Northern English. A Social and Cultural History. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Fumio, Muraishi, Shōzō & Kabe, Sasuke
1993Nihongo kaishaku katuyo jiten (A dictionary of reading and application of Japanese). Tokyo: Gyosei.Google Scholar