From noun to verb
Modeling variation in the English gerund system
This chapter reassesses the paradigmatic relations between present-day English nominal and verbal gerunds by examining their variation potential at an abstract-schematic level as well as at token-level. Results show that functional overlap is mainly instigated by verbal gerunds taking up more typically nominal uses, thus creating the conditions for variation with the nominal gerund. However, a collexeme analysis reveals that there is actually very little lexical overlap between both gerund types, as nominal gerunds are more restricted in terms of the verbs they can derive from. Thus, while paradigmatic links between nominal and verbal gerunds are present on an abstract-semantic level, their distinct lexical profiles confirm their reorientation to other constructional families.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A constructionist approach to relations in the gerund system
- 2.1The constructionist network
- 2.2The verbal gerund conundrum: Taxonomic relations in the gerund system
- 2.3Nominal and verbal gerunds: Horizontal relations in the gerund system
- 3.Functional overlap: Hierarchical configural frequency analysis
- 3.1Methodology
- 3.2Results: The attraction scenario
- 4.Lexical overlap: Distinctive collexeme analysis
- 4.1Methodology
- 4.2Results: The alternation scenario
- 5.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
-
Corpora
References (86)
References
Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic Gradience. The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Iordachioaia, Gianina, Cano, Mariangeles, Martin, Fabienne & Schäfer, Florian. 2013. The realization of external arguments in nominalizations. Journal of Comparative German Linguistics 16: 73–95.
Audring, Jenny. 2019. Mothers or sisters? The encoding of morphological knowledge. Word Structure 12(3): 274–296.
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Berg, Thomas. 2014. Boundary permeability: A parameter for linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology 18(3): 489–531.
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina & Harald Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer & Joost Zwarts (eds), 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.
Bybee, Joan & Thompson, Sandra. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, 378–388. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Cacoullos, Renata T. & Walker, James. 2009. The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language 85(2): 321–354.
Cappelle, Bert. 2006. Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions 1: 1–28.
Cappelle, Bert. 2009. Can we factor out free choice? In Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar, Andreas Dufter, Jürg Fleischer & Guido Seiler (eds), 183–202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.
De Smet, Hendrik, D’Hoedt, Frauke, Fonteyn, Lauren & Van Goethem, Kristel. 2018. The changing functions of competing forms: attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics 29(2): 197–234.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2008. Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 12: 55–102.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2010. English -ing-clauses and their problems: The structure of grammatical categories. Linguistics 48: 1153–1193.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: OUP.
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Declerck, Renaat. 2006. The Grammar of the English tense System: A Comprehensive Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Demske, Ulrike. 2002. Nominalization and argument structure in Early New High German. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 27: 67–90.
Denis, Derek & Tagliamonte, Sali. 2017. The changing future: Competition, specialization and reorganization in the contemporary English future temporal reference system. English Language and Linguistics 22(3): 403–430.
Diessel, Holger & Hilpert, Martin. 2016. Frequency effects in grammar. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Mark Aronoff (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Diessel, Holger. 2015. Usage-based construction grammar. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Eva Dabrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 295–321. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Diessel, Holger. 2019. The Grammar Network. How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.
Dik, Simon C. & Hengeveld, Kees. 1991. The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception-verb complements. Linguistics 29: 231–259.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2006. Complementation: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: OUP.
Ellis, Nick. 2002. Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. SSLA 24: 297–339.
von Eye, Alexander. 1990. Introduction to Configural Frequency Analysis: The Search for Types and Antitypes in Cross-classifications. Cambridge: CUP.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Fillmore, Charles, Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary C. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538.
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntactic change and borrowing: The case of the accusative-and-infinitive construction in English. In Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change, Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds), 17–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fonteyn, Lauren & Hartmann, Stefan. 2016. Usage-based perspectives on diachronic morphology: A mixed-methods approach towards English ing-nominals. Linguistics Vanguard 2(1): 1–12.
Fonteyn, Lauren & van de Pol, Nikki. 2016. Divide and conquer: The formation and functional dynamics of the Modern English -ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics 20(2): 185–219.
Fonteyn, Lauren, Heyvaert, Liesbet & Maekelberghe, Charlotte. 2015. How do gerunds conceptualize events? A diachronic study. Cognitive Linguistics 26(4): 583–612.
Fonteyn, Lauren. 2019. Categoriality in Language Change: The Case of the English Gerund. Oxford: OUP.
Fraser, Bruce. 1972. Some remarks on the action nominalization in English. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 83–98. Waltham MA: Ginn.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.
Grafmiller, Jason & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2019. Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world. A case study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change 30(3): 385–412.
Gries, Stefan T. 2003. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London: Continuum.
Gries, Stefan. 2004. HCFA 3.2. A program for R.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Mixed nominalizations, short verb movement and object shift in English. In Proceedings of Nels 28, Kiyomi Kusomoto & Pius N. Tamanji (eds), 143–157. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Hartmann, Stefan. 2014. Constructing a schema: Word-class changing morphology in a usage-based perspective. GCLA 2: 235–251.
Heller, Benedikt, Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Grafmiller, Jason. 2017. Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: The genitive alternation across varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1): 3–27.
Heyvaert, Liesbet, Maekelberghe, Charlotte & Buyle, Anouk. 2019. Nominal and verbal gerunds in Present-day English: Aspectual features and nominal status. Language Sciences 73: 32–49.
Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2008. On the constructional semantics of gerundive nominalizations. Folia Linguistica 42(1): 9–82.
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: EUP.
Hinrichs, Lars & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3): 437–474.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Hudson, Richard. 2007. Language Networks. Oxford: OUP.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 1993. Nominalizations. London: Routledge.
Labov, William. 1989. The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1: 85–94.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In The Cambridge history of the English Language, Vol. 2: 1066–1476, Norman Blake (ed.), 23–155. Cambridge: CUP.
Lees, Robert B. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington IN: IURC.
Maekelberghe, Charlotte. 2018. Present-day English gerunds: A multi-layered referential model. Folia Linguistica 52(1): 39–74.
Maekelberghe, Charlotte. 2019. The English gerund revisited: Exploring semantic differences through collocational analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 15(1): 205–237.
Maekelberghe, Charlotte. 2020. The Present-day English Gerund System. A Cognitive-Constructionist Account. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pfänder, Stefan & Behrens, Heike. 2016. Experience Counts: Frequency Effects in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2003. Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rosenbach, Anette. 2014. English genitive variation – The state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18(2): 215–262.
Schachter, Paul. 1976. Parts of speech systems. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 3–61. Cambridge: CUP.
Sommerer, Lotte & Zehentner, Eva. 2019. A convent of sisters without a mother superior? Discussing abstract nodes in the constructional network. Paper presented at the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC15), Nishinomiya, Japan.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason, Bresnan, Joan, Rosenbach, Anette, Tagliamonte, Sali & Todd, Simon. 2017. Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1): 86.
Tajima, Matsuji. 1985. The Syntactic Development of the Gerund in Middle English. Tokyo: Nan’un-do.
Trousdale, Graeme. 2015. Multiple inheritance and constructional change. In On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change [Benjamins Current Topics 79], Hendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière, Freek Van de Velde (eds), 19–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In The Extending Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 141–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vendler, Zeno. 1968. Adjectives and Nominalizations [Papers on Formal Linguistics 5]. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vosberg, Uwe. 2003. The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of -ing complements in Modern English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 305–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Corpora
Davies, Mark. 2004. BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus (1980s–1993). <[URL]>
Davies, Mark. 2008-. Corpus of Contemporary American English (Davies 2008–). <[URL]>
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Gillmann, Melitta
2024.
Allostructions and stancetaking: a corpus study of the German discourse management constructions Wo/wenn wir gerade/schon dabei sind
.
Cognitive Linguistics 35:1
► pp. 67 ff.
Maekelberghe, Charlotte & Isabelle Delaere
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.