Data sources

[BNC] Davies, Mark (2004-) BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at [URL]
[ECF] Eighteenth-Century Fiction 1996 Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar
[EEPF] Early English Prose Fiction 1997 Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar
[NCF] Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 1999–2000. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.
Baayen, R. Harald
1994Derivational productivity and text typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1: 16–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald & Renouf, Antoinette
1996Chronicling the Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72(1): 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2001Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1989A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P. & Blevins, Juliette
2009Introduction: Analogy in grammar. In Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds), 1–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972Degree Words. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano
2012Oriented -ingly adjuncts in Late Modern English. In English Historical Linguistics 2008: Selected Papers from the Fifteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 15), Munich, 24–30 August 2008. Volume II: Words, Texts and Genres, Hans Sauer & Gaby Waxenberger (eds), 147–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Beckner, Clay
2015Usage-based theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 953–980. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowie, Claire
2000The Discourse Motivations for Neologising: Action Nominalization in the History of English. In Lexicology, Semantics and Lexicography in English Historical Linguistic: Papers from the Fourth G.L. Brook Symposium, Manchester, August 1998, Julie Coleman & Christian J. Kay (eds), 179–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowie, Claire & Dalton-Puffer, Christiane
2002Diachronic word-formation: changes in productivity. In A changing world of words: studies in English historical lexicography, lexicology and semantics, Javier E. Díaz Vera (ed), 410–436. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Donovan, Melissa
2019Writing tips: Abolish the adverbs. Writing Forward, 30 July 2019, [URL]Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne & Yu, Alan C. L.
2006Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. The Linguistics Review 23(3): 213–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice & Campbell, Lyle
1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Killie, Kristin
1998The spread of -ly to present participles. In Advances in English Historical Linguistics, Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 119–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Stative Adverbs in English: A Study of Adverbial Productivity and Orientation. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
2015Secondary grammaticalization and the English adverbial -ly suffix. Language Sciences 47(B): 199–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
1984Why great: greatly but not big: *bigly? Studia Linguistica 38: 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Synsemantika. In Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuchzeitgenössischer Forschung, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 1251–1266. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menn, Lise & Macwhinney, Brian
1984The repeated morph constraint: toward an explanation. Language 60(3): 519–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1994Aspects of adverbial change in Early modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed), 243–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noble, William
2008Don’t Use Adverbs and Adjectives to Prettify Your Prose. Writer’s Digest: Write Better, Get Published, 21 August 2008, [URL].Google Scholar
[OED] Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edn 1989 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo
1999Morphological productivity: structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pratt, Lynda & Denison, David
2000The language of the Southey-Coleridge Circle. Language Sciences 22(3): 401–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reed, Shannon
2014The case against adverbs. Teachers at work: a column about teaching, 18 July 2014, [URL]Google Scholar
Schultink, Henk
1961Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen. Forum der Letteren 2: 110–125.Google Scholar
Skinner, John
2001An Introduction to Eighteenth-Century Fiction: Raising the Novel. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swan, Toril
1990Subject-oriented adverbs in 20th century English. Nordlyd 16: 14–58.Google Scholar
1997From manner to subject modification: adverbialization in English. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 20(2): 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Adverbialization and subject-modification in Old English. In Advances in English historical linguistics, Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 443–456. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Marle, Jaap
1985On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Schillová, Aksana
2023. Adverbs Derived from Adjectival Present Participles in Polish, Slovak and Czech: A Comparative Corpus-Based Study. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 74:1  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.