Cover not available
Part of
Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications
Edited by Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina and Cristina Lara-Clares
[Studies in Language Companion Series 225] 2022
► pp. 3–18

Chapter 1
Dangerous liaisons

An introduction to derivational paradigms

| University of Turin
Article outline
  • 1.Paradigms we live by
  • 2.Associative relations and derivational paradigms: A plea for the unity of morphology
  • 3.Paradigms for word formation
  • 4.The paradigmatic dimension and the return of lexicality
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.225.01gae
References (42)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2002. What you can do with derivational morphology. In Morphology 2000: Selected Papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, 24–28 February 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 218], Sabrina Bendjaballah, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Maria D. Voeikova (eds), 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Thomas. 1990. Analogie und morphologische Theorie. München: Fink.Google Scholar
. 1993. Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2016. Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana. 2019. Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29: 167–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1993. Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 27–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert & Hüning, Matthias. 2014. Affixoids and constructional idioms. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 77–106. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2020. Paradigms lost – paradigms regained. Paradigms as hyper-constructions. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 27], Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds), 277–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, Livio. 1998. Some remarks on analogy, reanalysis and grammaticalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 89–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Exploring grammaticalization from below. In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 45–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2010. Analogical change. In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 147–160. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2013. Affix ordering and conversion: Looking for the place of zero. Lingue e Linguaggio 12(2): 145–170.Google Scholar
. 2015. Action nouns in Romance. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1209–1229. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Co-opting exaptation in a theory of language change. In Exaptation in Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336], Muriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds), 57–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, Livio & Angster, Marco. 2019. Stripping paradigmatic relations out of the syntax. Morphology 29(2): 249–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Górska, Elżbieta. 1994. Moonless nights and smoke-free cities, or what can be without what? A cognitive study of privative adjectives in English. Folia Linguistica 28(3–4): 413–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1991. The last stages of grammatical elements: Contractive and expansive desemanticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19(1)], Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 301–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1989. From purposive to infinitive. A universal path of grammaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10(1–2): 287–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1994. Phonogenesis. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. The paradigm at the end of the universe. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 147–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Booij, Geert. 2014. From compounding to derivation. The emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica 48(2): 579–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1996. Verbal derivation in English: A historical survey or Much Ado About Nothing. In English Historical Linguistics 1994 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 135], Derek Britton (ed.), 93–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Volkmar. 2015. Categories of word-formation. In Word Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1020–1034. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2020. Univerbation. Folia Linguistica Historica 41(1): 205–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno. 1935. I prefissoidi (il tipo aeromobile, radiodiffusione). Archivio Glottologico Italiano 27: 13–39 (repr. in Idem (1963), Saggi sulla lingua del Novecento. Firenze: Sansoni, 9–60).Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. [1920] 1995. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer (English Translation by Herbert A. Strong. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1891).Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. [1916]1995. Cours de Linguistique Générale, edited by Tullio De Mauro. Paris: Payot (English Translation by Wade Baskin. New York NY: Philosophical Library, 1959).Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob. 1975. Die Prinzipien der deskriptiven und der etikettierenden Benennung. In Linguistic Workshop III. Arbeiten des Kölner Universalienprojekts, Hansjakob Seiler (ed), 2–57. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol. 2005. Onomasiological approach to word-formation. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 207–232. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Christopher M. 2005. Revisiting the affixoid debate: On the grammaticalization of the word. In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds), 71–83. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2020. Paradigm Function Morphology: Assumptions and Innovations. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata. 2009. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, Kristel. 2008. Oud-leerling versus ancien élève: A comparative study of adjectives grammaticalizing into prefixes in Dutch and French. Morphology 18: 27–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Marle, Jaap. 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar