Chapter 9
Conversion in a paradigmatic framework of word formation
This paper intends to present arguments that favour a paradigmatic approach to conversion, extending Bonami & Strnadová’s (2019) proposal of aligning relations within paradigmatic systems to the aligning relation criteria. The paper compares English and Portuguese conversion and syntactic nominalisations, according to the aligning relation criteria. Those criteria compare the different phenomena with affixed deverbal nouns situated in a paradigmatic level. A paradigmatic approach strengthens the concept of conversion as word formation because it enables us to observe an alignment between conversion pairs and affixation pairs, in contrast to syntactic nominalisations, which do not obey the same features of affixed deverbal nouns and are, thus, not aligned with them.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.What is conversion?
- 2.1Defining conversion
- 2.2Does conversion exist in Romance languages as a word-formation mechanism?
- 2.3Is directionality important in a paradigmatic approach?
- 3.Conversion and syntactic nominalisations
- 3.1Criteria
- 3.2Application of criteria
- 4.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
Abbreviations
-
References
References (113)
References
Alcoba Rueda, Santiago. 1989. Tema verbal y formación de palabras en español. In Actas do XIX Congreso Internacional de Lingüística e Filoloxía Románicas, Ramón Lorenzo Vázquez (ed.), 323–346. A Coruña: Fundación “Pedro Barrié de la Maza, Conde Fenosa”.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. Nominal derivation. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 235–256. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, Artemis, Iordăchioaia, Gianina & Schäfer, Florian. 2011. Scaling the variation in Romance and Germanic nominalizations. In The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, Variation, and Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 171], Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds), 25–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alvar Ezquerra, Manuel. 1983. Vitalidad y pervivencia del sufijo nominalizador -o. In Serta philologica F. Lázaro Carreter. Natalem diem sexagesimum celebranti dicata, Vol. 1, 47–58. Madrid: Editorial Cátedra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alvar, Manuel & Pottier, Bernard. [1983]1993. Morfología histórica del español, 2nd ed. Madrid: Gredos.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andrade, Amália. 2020. Vocalismo. In Gramática do português, Vol. 3, Eduardo Raposo, Maria Fernanda Bacelar do Nascimento, Maria Antónia Mota, Luísa Seguro & Amália Mendes (eds), 3239–3330. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Antoniová, Vesna & Štekauer, Pavol. 2015. Derivational paradigms within the selected conceptual fields – contrastive research. Facta Universitatis 13(2): 61–75. <[URL]>
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Basílio, Margarida. 1987. Teoria Lexical. São Paulo: Ática.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie. 1997. Derivational paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 243–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie. 2005. Productivity: Theories. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 315–334. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie. 2017. Metonymy and the semantics of word formation. In Morphological Variation: Synchrony and Diachrony. Online Proceedings of the Mediterranean Morphology Meeting 11, Nikos Koutsoukos, Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds), 1–13. <[URL]> (25 April 2020).
Bauer, Laurie. 2018. Conversion as metonymy. Word Structure 11(2): 175–184. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie. 2019. Rethinking Morphology. Edinburgh: EUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie & Valera, Salvador (eds). 2005. Approaches to Conversion/Zero-Derivation. Münster: Waxmann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14: 150–177. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blevins, James P. 2013. Word-based morphology from Aristotle to modern WP (Word and Paradigm models). In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics, Keith Allan (ed), 375–395. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonami, Olivier & Boyé, Gilles. 2002. Suppletion and stem dependency in inflectional morphology. In Proceedings of the 8th HPSG Conference, Franck Van Eynde, Lars Hellan & Dorothee Beerman (eds), 51–70. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana. 2019. Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29(2): 167–197. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brito, Ana Maria. 2012a. A nominalização do infinitivo em português europeu. Textos seleccionados, XXVII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 98–120. Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brito, Ana Maria. 2012b. O infinitivo nominal em Português Europeu: aspectos sintácticos e semânticos. In Nada na linguagem lhe é estranho: Estudos em homenagem a Isabel Hub Faria, Armanda Costa & Inês Duarte (eds), 109–126. Porto: Afrontamento.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brito, Ana Maria. 2013. Tensed and non-tensed nominalization of the infinitive in Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 12(1): 7–40. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2006. Internal modification. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 5, Keith Brown (ed), 752–755. Oxford: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cetnarowska, Bożena. n.d. Conversion as metonymy and the question of recursiveness. <[URL]> (30 June 2021).
Cetnarowska, Bożena. 1993. The Syntax, Semantics and Derivation of Bare Nominalisations in English. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. <[URL]>
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar, Noam Chomsky (ed), 11–61. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbin, Danielle. 1987. Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Eystein & Fábregas, Antonio. 2020. Zero morphemes. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Morphology, Rochelle Lieber (ed), 1225–1243. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Don, Jan. 1993. Morphological Conversion. Utrecht: LEd.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Don, Jan. 2005a. Roots, deverbal nouns and denominal verbs. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology, On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterraenean Morphology Meeting (MMM4), Catania, 21–23 September 2003, Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi & Sergio Scalise (eds), <[URL]> (15 April 2020).
Don, Jan. 2005b. On conversion, relisting and zero-derivation. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(2): 2–16. <[URL]>
Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina & Čermák, Jan. 2018. Derivational paradigms and competition in English: A diachronic study on competing causative verbs and their derivatives. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 15(3): 69–97. <[URL]>
Gaeta, Livio. 2015. Restrictions in word-formation. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 859–875. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimm, Scott & McNally, Louise. 2015. The -ing dynasty: Rebuilding the semantics of nominalizations. Proceedings of SALT 25: 82–102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hay, Jennifer & Plag, Ingo. 2004. What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 565–596. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51: 639–671. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray & Audring, Jenny. 2020. The Texture of the Lexicon. Relational Morphology and the Parallel Architecture. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jovanović, Vladimir Ž. 2003. On productivity, creativity and restrictions on word conversion in English. Facta Universitatis Series: Linguistics and Literature (2)10: 425–436.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kawaletz, Lea & Plag, Ingo. 2015. Predicting the semantics of English nominalizations: A frame-based analysis of -ment suffixation. In Semantics of Complex Words, Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 289–319. Cham: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kehdi, Valter. 1998. A derivação regressiva em português. Filologia e lingüística portuguesa 2: 205–213. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerleroux, Françoise. 1996. La coupure invisible. Études de syntaxe et de morphologie. Villenueve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerleroux, Françoise. 2005. On a subclass of non-affixed deverbal nouns in French. In Online Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Geert Booij, Luca Ducceschi, Bernard Fradin, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds), 93–103. <[URL]> (15 April 2020).
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981, Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Körtvélyessy, Lívia. 2015. Evaluative Morphology from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Körtvélyessy, Lívia, Bagasheva, Alexandra, Štekauer, Pavol & Valera, Salvador. 2020. Introduction. In Derivational Networks across Languages, Lívia Körtvélyessy, Alexandra Bagasheva & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 1–26. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Zoltán & Radden, Günter. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic point of view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37–77. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lees, Robert. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Libben, Gary. 2015. Word-formation in psycholinguistics and neurocognitive research. In Word-formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 203–217. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, Rochelle. 1981. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lobato, Lúcia. 1995. A derivação regressiva em português: conceituação e tratamento gerativo. In Miscelânea de estudos linguísticos, filológicos e literários in memoriam Celso Cunha, Cilene C. Pereira, & Paulo Roberto D. Pereira (eds), 205–230. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lobato, Lúcia. 1999. Particípios rizotônicos de primeira conjugação e deverbais não afixais no português. In A delimitação de unidades lexicais [Thematic Vol. 1 of Palavra 5], Margarida Basílio (ed.), 29–68. Rio de Janeiro: Grypho.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchand, Hans. 1963. On a question of contrary analysis with derivationally connected but morphologically uncharacterized words. English Studies 44: 176–187. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchand, Hans. 1964. A set of criteria for the establishing of derivational relationship between words unmarked by derivational morphemes. Indogermanische Forschungen 69: 10–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation: A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach, 2nd edn. Munich: C.H. Beck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martsa, Sándor. 2013. Conversion in English: A Cognitive Semantic Approach. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martsa, Sándor. 2020. Conversion in morphology. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Morphology, Rochelle Lieber (ed), 779–892. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mateus, Maria Helena, Brito, Ana Maria, Duarte, Inês & Faria, Isabel Hub. 1989. Gramática da língua portuguesa. Lisboa: Editorial Caminho.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mateus, Maria Helena Mira & d’Andrade, Ernesto. 2000. The Phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mattoso Câmara, Joaquim Jr. 1985. História e estrutura da língua portuguesa, 4th edn. Rio de Janeiro: Padrão-Livraria Editora.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neef, Martin. 2005. On some alleged constraints on conversion. In Approaches to Conversion/Zero-Derivation, Laurie Bauer & Salvador Valera (eds), 103–130. Münster: Waxmann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nunes, José Joaquim. [1919]1989. Compêndio de gramática histórica portuguesa, 9th edn. Lisboa: Clássica Editora.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oxford English Dictionary Online (OED). 2021. OUP. <[URL]> (15 April 2020).
Pena, Jesús. 1980. La derivación en español: Verbos derivados y sustantivos verbales [Verba, Anuario Galego de Filoloxía 16]. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela: Secretariado de Publicaciones.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct. London: Penguin. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and Rules. New York NY: Harper Perennial.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rainer, Franz. 2016. Spanish. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 4, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, Franz Rainer (eds), 2620–2640. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rainer, Franz. 1993. Spanische Wortbildungslehre. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rainer, Franz. 2005. Constraints on productivity. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 335–352 Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rainer, Franz, Gardani, Francesco, Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Luschützky, Hans Christian (eds). 2019. Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation. Cham: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2001. A construção de postverbais em português. Porto: Granito Editores.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2004. Condições de formação de nomes postverbais em português. In Verbos e nomes em português, Graça Rio-Torto & Rui Abel Pereira (eds), 129–185 Coimbra: Livraria Almedina.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2008. A formação de substantivos deverbais sufixados em português. München: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2009. Portuguese converted deverbal nouns: Constraints on their bases. Word Structure 2(1): 69–107. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2013. Is conversion a lexical or a syntactic process of word formation? Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto 8: 89–120.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2014. Causative eventive chains and selection of affixes in Portuguese nominalisations. Lingue e Linguaggio 8(1): 159–184.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2015. A gramática do léxico: Morfologia derivacional e o léxico mental. Munich: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2016. Nomes deverbais. In Gramática derivacional do português, 2nd edn, Graça Rio-Torto, Alexandra Soares Rodrigues, Isabel Pereira, Rui Pereira & Sílvia Ribeiro (eds), 176–240. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2018a. Escala de prototipicidad en la derivación no-afijal en una perspectiva paradigmática. XIV Encuentro de Morfólogos. Morforetem: <[URL]> (22 June 2020).
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2018b. Correlação entre o grau de complexidade e o grau de regularidade e de saturação de paradigmas derivacionais. In Actas do XIII Congreso Internacional de Lingüística Xeral, Marta Díaz, Gael Vaamonde, Ana Varel, Mª Carmen Cabeza, José M. García-Miguel & Fernando Ramallo (eds), 846–853. Vigo: Universidade de Vigo. <[URL]> (3 March 2020).
Sanders, Gerald. 1988. Zero derivation and the overt analogue criterion. In Theoretical Morphology. Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds), 155–175. San Diego CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santiago Lacuesta, Ramón & Bustos Gisbert, Eugenio. 1999. La derivación nominal. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 3: Entre la oración y el discurso. Morfología, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 4505–4594. Madrid: Espasa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schönefeld, Doris. 2005. Zero-derivation – functional change – metonymy. In Approaches to Conversion/Zero-Derivation, Laurie Bauer & Salvador Valera (eds), 131–159. Münster: Waxmann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sleeman, Peter & Brito, Ana Maria. 2010a. Aspect and argument structure of deverbal nominalizations: A split vP analysis. In The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks, Artemis Alexiadou & Monika Rathert (eds), 199–218. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Štekauer, Pavol. 1996. A Theory of Conversion in English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Štekauer, Pavol. 2005. Onomasiological approach to word-formation. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 207–232. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Štekauer, Pavol. 2014. Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ten Hacken, Pius. 2014. Delineating derivation and inflection. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 10–25. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornton, Anna M. 2004. Conversione: Introduzione. In La formazione delle parole in italiano, Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer (eds), 499–553. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tribout, Delphine. 2010. Les conversions de nom à verbe et de verbe à nom en français. PhD dissertation, Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7).
Tribout, Delphine. 2012. Verbal stem space and verb to noun conversion in French. Word Structure 5(1): 109–128. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valera, Salvador. 2004. Conversion vs. unmarked word-class change. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 1(1): 20–42. <[URL]>
Valera, Salvador. 2006. Conversion. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed), 172–175. Boston MA: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valera, Salvador. 2014. Conversion. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 154–168. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valera, Salvador. 2015. Conversion. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 322–339. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valera, Salvador. 2017. Conversion and figurative extension of meaning. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 14(2): 2–17. <[URL]>
Valera, Salvador. 2021. Main morphological formal means (III): Approaches to conversion. In The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Morphology, Antonio Fábregas, Víctor Acedo-Matellán, Grant Armstrong, María Cristina Cuervo & Isabel Pujol Payet (eds), 40–54. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valera, Salvador & Ruz, Alba E. 2021. Conversion in English: Homonymy, polysemy and paronymy. English Language and Linguistics 25(1): 181–204. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Varro, Marcus Terentius. (47–45 B.C.). De lingua latina, Julius Pomponium Laetum (ed). Rome: Georgius Lauer, s.d. [ca. 1471], editio princeps.
Varvara, Rossella & Zamparelli, Roberto. 2019. Competition between event-denoting deverbal nouns and nominal infinitives in Italian. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 95–121. Cham: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Ševčíková, Magda & Hana Hledíková
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.