Cover not available
Part of
On Spoken French: An Ashby Reader
William J. Ashby
[Studies in Language Companion Series 226] 2023
► pp. 419–450

A new look at ‘ne’ loss in the Spoken French of Tours

A case of change in progress?

| University of California, Santa Barbara
| University of Louisville
Although the standard French norm prescribes that negation is marked twice in the verb phrase (ne…pas), contemporary usage prefers to drop the first element (ne) in Spoken French. In a 1981 article based on a corpus of Spoken French recorded in Tours in 1976, Ashby brought to light a significant co-variation/correlation between ne loss and speaker age: younger speakers dropped ne much more often than older speakers. This distribution seems to stem from a change in apparent time. However, as Labov (1994) notes, a linguistic feature that is more frequent in younger speakers does not necessarily indicate change in progress. One could assume that it could be due to age-grading, a phenomenon whereby speakers alter their linguistic behavior over the course of their lifetimes, while the grammar of the speech community remains stable and does not change. In order to distinguish between these two hypotheses (change in progress on the one hand, age grading on the other), this study compares distributions of the linguistic variable ne at two different points in time: the 1976 Tours corpus is paired with a new Tours corpus recorded in 1995. This comparison shows in real time that the loss of ne has accelerated – a finding which supports the change in progress hypothesis.
Published online: 2 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.226.c32
References (80)
References
Ashby, William J. 1977. Clitic Inflection in French: An Historical Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1981. The Loss of the negative particle ne in French: A Syntactic change in progress. Language 57: 674–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. When does variation indicate linguistic change in progress. Journal of French Language Studies 1(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy. 1994. Negative evidence: Or another look at the non-use of negative ne in seventeenth-century French. French Studies 48: 63–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Alan. 1981. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 1985. Coexistence de deux usages de la syntaxe du français parlé. In Contacts de langues: Discours oral, Jean-Claude Bouvier. (ed.), 201–214. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire & Jeanjean, Colette. 1987. Le Français parlé: Transcription et édition. Paris: Didier Erudition.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. & Trudgill, Peter. 1980. Dialectology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Coveney, Aidan. 1996. Variability in Spoken French: A Sociolinguistic Study of Interrogation and Negation. Exeter: Elm Bank.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephen. Paolino, Danae & Cumming, Susanna. 1993. Discourse Transcription [Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 4]. Santa Barbara CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li. (ed), 149–188. New York’NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Krassin, Gudrun. 1994. Neuere Entwicklungen in der französischen Grammatik und Grammatikforschung [Romanistische Arbeitshefte 38]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lodge, R. Anthony. 1993. French: From Dialect to Standard. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdicke, Annemarie. 1982. Zum Ausfall des Verneinungspartikel `ne’ im gesprochen Französisch. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 98: 43–57.Google Scholar
Pohl, Jacques. 1968. Ne dans le français parlé contemporain: Les modalités de son abandon. In Actas: [Madrid, 1965] XI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románicas, t. 3, Antonio Quilles, Ramón Carril & Margarita Cantarero. (eds), 1343–1358. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.Google Scholar
. 1975. L’omission de ne dans le français parlé contemporain. Le Français dans le monde 111: 17–23.Google Scholar
Posner, Rebecca. 1985. Post-verbal negation in non-standard French: A historical and comparative view. Romance Philology 39: 170–197.Google Scholar
. 1997. Linguistic Change in French. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rand, David & Sankoff, David. 1990. GoldVarb 2.0 (software and documentation obtained directly from the authors). Montréal: Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Vincent, Diane. 1977. L’emploi productif de ne dans le français parlé à Montréal. Le Français Moderne 45: 243–256.Google Scholar
. 1980. The productive use of ne in Montreal French. In The Social Life of Language, Gillian Sankoff & Diane Vincent. (eds), 295–310. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, Armin. 1988. Word order changes in predicate negation strategies in Romance languages. Diachronica 1(2): 21–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sturm, Joachim. 1981. Morpho-syntaktische Untersuchungen zur `phrase négative’ im gesprochenen Französich. Die Verneinung mit und ohne `NE’. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Editor’s references
Ashby, William J. 1973. The rise of prefixed inflection in French. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan, Ph.D. diss.
1976/This volume. The loss of the negative morpheme, ne, in Parisian French. Lingua, 39:119–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977. Clitic Inflection in French: An Historical Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1980/This volume. Prefixed conjugation in Parisian French. In Italic and Romance Linguistic Studies in Honor of Ernst Pulgram [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 18], Herbert J. Izzo (ed.), 195–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988/ This volume. The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left- and right-dislocations in French. Lingua 75:203–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en français parlé tourangeau: s’agit-il d’un changement en cours? Journal of French Language Studies 11: 1–22. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auger, Julie. 1993. More evidence for verbal agreement marking in colloquial French. In Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 103], William J. Ashby, Marianne Mithun, Giorgio Perissinotto & Eduardo Raposo. (eds), 177–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Pronominal Clitics in Quebec Colloquial French: A Morphological Analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Auger, Julie & Villeneuve, Anne-José. 2008. Ne deletion in Picard and in regional French: Evidence for distinct grammars. In Social Lives in Language – Sociolinguistics and multilingual Speech Communities: Celebrating the Work of Gillian Sankoff [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 24], Miriam Meyerhoff & Naomi Nagy. (eds), 223–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A., Slobin, Dan I., Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A., Bamberg, Michael, Dasinger, Lisa, Marchman, Virginia, Neeman, Yonni, Rodkin, Philip C., Sebastián, Eugenia, et al.. 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire & Jeanjean, Collette. 1987. Le Français parlé: Transcription et édition. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Blattner, Géraldine & Williams, Lawrence. 2011. L’emploi variable du ne dans le discours électronique synchrone: une étude variationniste en temps apparent. Langage & société 138: 109–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2015. Bybee, Joan L. 2015. Language Change [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1999. Spoken Standard English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2013. Grammaticalisation in social context: The emergence of a new English pronoun. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17: 608–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981/1993. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer. 2010. Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker. Language 86(1): 85–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer & Legendre, Géraldine. 2014. Prefixal agreement and impersonal ‘il’ in Spoken French: Experimental evidence. Journal of French Language Studies 24: 83–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cat, Cécile. 2007. French Dislocation: Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Bryan. 2017. Negation in near-native French: Variation and sociolinguistic competence. Language Learning 67(1): 141–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dugua, Céline & Baude, Olivier. 2017. La liaison à Orléans, corpus et changement linguistique: Une première étude exploratoire. Journal of French Language Studies 27(1): 41–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth Beale. 2000. The Change from Pronoun to Clitic to Prefix and the Rise of Null Subjects in Spoken Swiss French. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie B. (2005). Zero marking in French impersonal verbs: A counter trend to clitic morphologization? In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Marc Ettlinger, Nicholas Fleisher & Mischa Park-Doob (eds), 81–92. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth B. 2007. The emergence of emphatic ne in conversational Swiss French. Journal of French Language Studies 17(3): 249–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie B. 2009. The overt pronoun constraint in conversational Swiss French: Implications for classroom learners. The French Review 82(4): 802–820.Google Scholar
2017. Discourse-pragmatic change and emphatic negation in Spoken French: Or coming full circle. In The Pragmatics of Negation: Negative Meanings, Uses and Discursive Functions [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 283], Malin Roitman. (ed.), 123–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie & Waugh, Linda R. 2003a. On the radical difference between the subject personal pronouns in written and spoken European French. In Corpus Analysis: 16 Language Structure and Language Use [Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 46], Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 225–240. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2003b. The subject clitics of Conversational European French: Morphologization, grammatical change, semantic change, and change in progress. In A Romance Perspective on Linguistic Knowledge and Use [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 238], Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis López & Richard Cameron. (eds), 99–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuβ, Eric. 2005. The Rise of Agreement: A Formal Approach to the Syntax and Grammaticalization of Verbal Inflection [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 81]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (ed.). 2009. Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (ed). 2016. Cyclical Change Continued. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 227]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Anita Berit & Malderez, Isabelle. 2004. Le ne de négation en région parisienne: Une étude en temps réel. Langage et Société 107(1): 5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2011. Negative Cycles and Grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine. (eds), 570–579. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jakubowicz, Célia & Rigaut, Catherine. 1997. L’acquisition des clitiques nominatifs en français. In Les Pronoms: Morphologie. syntaxe et typologie, Anne Zribi-Hertz. (ed.), 57–99. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires Vincennes.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klausenburger, Jurgen. 2000. Grammaticalization: Studies in Latin and Romance Morphosyntax. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 193]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martineau, France & Mougeon, Raymond. 2003. A sociolinguistic study of the origins of ne deletion in European and Quebec French. Language 79(1): 118–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisner, Charlotte & Pomino, Natascha. 2014. Synchronic variation in the expression of French negation: A Distributed Morphology approach. Journal of French Language Studies 24(1): 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierce, Amy E. 1992. Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & St. Amand, Anne. 2007. A real-time windown on 19th-century vernacular French: The Récits du français québécois d’autrefois. Language in Society 36: 707–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. On the status of subject clitics in Romance. In Studies in Romance Linguistics, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen Silva-Corvalan (eds), 391–419. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberge, Yves. 1986. Subject Doubling, Free Inversion, and Null Argument Languages. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 31:55–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. The Syntactic Recoverability of Null Arguments. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Roitman, Malin & Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie. 2022, to appear. Negative campaigning: Communicating negative meanings in French presidential debates. In Negative Meanings: Social Settings and Pragmatic Effects:Using Negatives in Political Discourse, Social Media, and Oral Interaction, Malin Roitman. (ed.), ___. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Vincent, Dianne. 1977. L’emploi productif du ne dans le français parlé à Montréal. Le Français Moderne 45.243–56.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Vincent, Diane. 1980. The productive use of ne in Montreal French. In The Social Life of Language, Gillian Sankoff & Diane Vincent. (eds), 295–310. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, A. 1990. Analyticity and Syntheticity: A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. 2006. Fine-tuning Jespersen’s Cycle. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn [Studies in Language Campanion Series 80], Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward. (eds), 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stark, Elisabeth, Meisner, Charlotte & Völker, Harald. (eds). 2014. Negation and Clitics in French: Interaction and Variation. Special issue of Journal of French Language Studies 24(1).Google Scholar
van Compernolle, Rémi. 2009. Emphatic ne in informal spoken French and implications for foreign language pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19(1): 47–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The (slightly more) productive use of ne in Montreal French chat. Language Sciences 32(4): 447–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Michael & Kaiser, Georg A. 2014. On expletive subject pronoun drop in Colloquial French. Journal of French Language Studies, 24, 107–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1994. ‘La syntaxe des clitiques nominatifs en français standard et en français avancé’, Travaux de linguistique et de philologie XXXII: 131–147.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ashby, William J. & Bonnie B. Fonseca-Greber
2023. Variable liaison in the Spoken French of Tours: A real-time analysis. In On Spoken French [Studies in Language Companion Series, 226], ► pp. 451 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.