Part of
Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective
Edited by Alessandra Barotto and Simone Mattiola
[Studies in Language Companion Series 227] 2023
► pp. 3563
Aijmer, Karin
2014Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix
1987A comparative analysis of linguistic routines in two languages: English and ewe. Journal of Pragmatics 11(3): 299–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apresjan, Jurij D.
2005O Moskovskoj semantičeskoj škole. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (1): 3–30.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1975How to do Things with Words, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C. & Ziem, Alexander
2018Constructing a constructicon for German: Empirical, theoretical, and methodological issues. In Lyngfelt, Borin, Ohara & Torrent (eds), 183–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byčkova, Polina
2020aThe pragmaticalization sources of discourse formulae of negation from typological perspective: Russian and Slovene. Philological Studies 18(2): 187–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020bDiscourse formulae of confirmation in typological perspective. Jezikoslovni zapiski, 26(2): 111–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capone, Alessandro
2005Pragmemes (a study with reference to English and Italian). Journal of Pragmatics 37(9): 1355–1371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Pragmemes (again). Lingua 209: 89–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
1981Introduction: Conversational routine. In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech [Rasmus Rask Studies in Pragmatic Linguistics 2], Florian Coulmas (ed), 1–17. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1994Speech act classification, language typology and cognition. In Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed), 460–477. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola
(eds) 2013Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed), 403–426. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2011Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2): 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne, Janda, Laura A. & Nesset, Tore
2014Old Church Slavonic “Byti” part two: Constructional profiling analysis. The Slavic and East European Journal 58(3): 498–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Sansò, Andrea
(eds) 2017Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 186]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1979On fluency. In Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, Charles J. Fillmore, Daniel Kempler & William S. Wong (eds), 85–101. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Frame semantics. In Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, Dirk Geeraerts (ed), 373–400. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Atkins, Beryl T.
2000Describing polysemy: The case of “Crawl”. In Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, Yael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (eds), 91–110. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’connor, Mary
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3): 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne & Yaguello, Marina
2004Discourse markers across languages? Evidence from English and French. In Discourse across Languages and Cultures [Studies in Language Companion Series 68], Carol Lynn Moder & Aida Martinovic-Zic (eds), 129–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre
2008Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed), 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerasimenko, Ekaterina, Puzhaeva, Svetlana, Zakharova, Elena & Rakhilina, Ekaterina
2019Defining discourse formulae: computational approach. In Proceedings of Third Workshop “Computational Linguistics and Language Science”, Gerhard Wohlgenannt, Ruprecht von Waldenfels, Svetlana Toldova, Ekaterina Rakhilina, Denis Paperno, Olga Lyashevskaya, Natalia Loukachevitch et al. (eds), 61–69. Manchester: EasyChair.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2013Constructionist approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 15–31. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2013Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2011The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1): 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme
2013The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura A., Endersen, Anna, Zhukova, Valentina, Mordashova, Daria & Rakhilina, Ekaterina
2021How to build a constructicon in five years: The Russian example. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34: 161–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura A., Lyashevskaya, Olga, Nesset, Tore, Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Tyers, Francis M.
2018A constructicon for Russian. In Lyngfelt, Borin, Ohara & Torrent (eds), 165–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura A., Endresen, Anna, Zhukova, Valentina, Mordashova, Daria & Rakhilina, Ekaterina
In print. From data to theory: An emergent semantic classification based on the large-scale Russian constructicon. Constructions and Frames.
Kecskes, Istvan
2010Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42(11): 2889–2897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail
2008Locutionary, illocutionary, perlocutionary. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(6): 1189–1202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Speech act classifications. In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, Marina Sbisà, & Ken Turner (eds), 173–202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Vanhove, Martine
2016The semantics of lexical typology. In Routledge Handbook of Semantics, Nick Riemer (ed), 434–454. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lander, Yurij, Maisak, Timur & Rakhilina, Ekaterina
2013Verbs of aquamotion: Semantic domains and lexical systems. In Motion Encoding in Language and Space, Mila Vulchanova & Emile van der Zee (eds), 67–83. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lyngfelt, Benjamin, Borin, Lars, Ohara, Kyoko & Torrent, Tiago Timponi
(eds) 2018Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyngfelt, Benjamin, Torrent, Tiago Timpani, Laviola, Adrieli, Bäckström, Linnéa, Hannesdóttir, Anna Helga & da Silva Matos, Ely Edison
Majid, Asifa, Boster, James S. & Bowerman, Melissa
2008The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking. Cognition 109(2): 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2005Standard Negation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2015Discourse and grammar. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 9–41. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ohara, Kyoko H.
2013Toward Constructicon building for Japanese in Japanese FrameNet. Veredas-Revista de Estudos Linguísticos 17(1): 11–27.Google Scholar
Panov, Vladimir
2020The marking of uncontroversial information in Europe: Presenting the enimitive. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52(1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent & Patten, Amanda L.
2019Towards an English Constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(3): 354–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A.
2001The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of pragmatics 33(3): 349–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakhilina, Ekaterina, Bychkova, Polina & Koziuk, Evgenia
forthcoming. At the borders of Constructicon: Discourse formulae. In Constructing Constructicons [Human Cognitive Processing 48], Alexander Ziem, Alexander Willich & Sascha Michel eds Amsterdam John Benjamins
Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Reznikova, Tatiana
2016A frame-based methodology for lexical typology. In The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts, Päivi Juvonen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 95–129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakhilina, Ekaterina V., Bychkova, Polina A. & Zhukova, Svetlana Yu
2021Speech acts as a linguistic category: The case of discourse formulae. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 2: 7–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M.
1985Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed), 155–196. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1975A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Language, Mind and Knowledge, Keith Gunderson (ed), 344–369. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sköldberg, Emma, Bäckström, Linnea, Borin, Lars, Forsberg, Markus, Lyngfelt, Benjamin, Olsson, Leif-Jöran, Prentice, Julia, Rydstedt, Rudolf, Tingsell, Sofia & Uppström, Jonatan
2013Between grammars and dictionaries: A Swedish Constructicon. In Electronic Lexicography in the 21st Century: Thinking Outside the Paper. Proceedings of the eLex 2013 Conference, 17–19 October 2013, Tallinn, Estonia, Iztok Kosem, Jelena Kallas, Polona Gantar, Simon Krek, Margit Langemets & Maria Tuulik (eds), 310–327. Ljubljana/Tallinn: Trojina, Institute for Applied Slovene Studies/Eesti Keele Instituut.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2001Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Torrent, Tiago Timpani, Lage, Ludmila M., Sampaio, Thais F., da Silva Tavares, Tatiane & da Silva Matos, Ely E.
Veselinova, Ljuba
2014The negative existential cycle revisited. Linguistics 52(6): 1327–1389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Cysouw, Michael
2012Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3): 671–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar