Part of
Reconnecting Form and Meaning: In honour of Kristin Davidse
Edited by Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor and An Van linden
[Studies in Language Companion Series 230] 2023
► pp. 209236
Andreou, Marios & Lieber, Rochelle
2019Aspectual and quantificational properties of deverbal conversion and -ing nominalizations. The power of context. English Language and Linguistics 24(2): 333–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano
2010As-simultaneity clauses as complements of erception verbs. The case of watch. Textus XXIII(3): 583–602.Google Scholar
Chrispin, Lucy
2022A Cognitive Functional Account of Pure Intransitive Verbal Categories and Their Intransitive Patterning. PhD dissertation, Cardiff University.
Davidse, Kristin
1999Categories of Experiential Grammar [Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 7]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
2017Systemic Functional Linguistics and the clause. The experiential metafunction. In The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds), 79–95. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2018A tribute to M. A. K. Halliday (1925–2018). Functions of Language 25(2): 205–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Breban, Tine
2019A cognitive-functional approach to the order of adjectives in the English noun phrase. Linguistics 57(2): 327–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Geyskens, Sara
1998Have you walked the dog yet? The ergative causativization of intransitives. Word 49(2): 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Rymen, Kathleen
Davies, Mark
2008–The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA.: 560 million words 1990–present <[URL] (15 September 2021).
Declerck, Renaat, Reed, Susan, & Capelle, Bert
2006The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause [Functional Grammar Series 20], 2nd edn, Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela. & Locke, Philip
2006English Grammar. A University Course, 2nd edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1977Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English ‘imperfective’ progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1): 45–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s Ptq. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egan, Thomas
2008Non-finite Complementation. A Usage-based Study of Infinitive and -ing Clauses in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Maarouf, Ismaïl
2013Methodological aspects of Corpus Pattern Analysis. ICAME 37: 119–148.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin
2008Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar. An Extension and Simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise
2017aOn prepositions and particles. A case for lexical representation in Systemic Functional Linguistics. Word 63(2): 115–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017bLexis as most local context. Towards an SFL approach to lexicology. Functional Linguistics 4: 17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, Lise & Schönthal, David
2019The rooms of the house. Grammar at group rank. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, Geoff Thompson, Wendy Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds), 118–141. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre
2008Semantic maps and the typology of colexification. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed.), 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022Lexical tectonics. Mapping structural change in patterns of lexification. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41(1): 89–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2018The Diachrony of Verb Meaning. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas
2020Ten Lectures on Event Structure in a Network Theory of Language. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter
2016Seeing is believing. Evidentiality and visual perception verbs in early modern English witness depositions. In Studies in the History of the English Language VII. Generalizing vs. Particularizing Methodologies in Historical Linguistic Analysis, Don Chapman, Colette Moore & Miranda Wilcox (eds), 153–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1961/2002Categories of the theory of grammar. In On Grammar. Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Vol. 1, Jonathan Webster (ed.), 95–105. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 1st edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Matthiessen, Christian
2014An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, Patrick
2004Corpus pattern analysis. In Proceedings of the 11th Euralex International Congress, Geoffrey Williams & Sandra Vessier (eds), 87–98. Lorient: UBS.Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick & Pustejovsky, James
2005A pattern dictionary for natural language processing. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 10(2): 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1996The grammarian’s dream. Lexis as most delicate grammar. In Ways of Saying, Ways of Meaning: Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran, David Butt, & Geoffrey Williams (eds), 73–103. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill
2000Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ialongo, Cristiano
2016Understanding the effect size and its measures. Lessons in biostatistics. Biochemia Medica 26(2): 150–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít
2014The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1: 7–36. [URL] (15 September 2021).
Laffut, An & Davidse, Kristin
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2012The lexical semantics of verbs of motion. The perspective from unaccusativity. In Thematic Structure. Its Role in Grammar, Iggy M. Roca (ed.), 247–270. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
McGregor, William
2021Neo-Firthian Approaches to Linguistic Typology. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., Matthiessen, Christian and Painter, Claire
1997Working with Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian
1995Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences.Google Scholar
Monaghan, James
1979The Neo-Firthian Tradition and its Contribution to General Linguistics [Linguistische Arbeiten 73]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014–Pattern Dictionary of English Verbs. [URL] (13 September 2021).
Radden, Günter & Dirven, René
2007Cognitive English Grammar [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2004Structuring Events. A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect [Explorations in Semantics 2]. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rzymski, Christoph, Tresoldi, Tiago, Greenhill, Simon J., et al.
2019The Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications, reproducible analysis of cross- linguistic polysemies. Scientific Data 7(article 13). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
see, v.”. OED Online. September 2021 Oxford University Press. [URL] (10 September 2021).
Smith, Carlota
1991The Parameter of Aspect (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy Vol. 43). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
2014Introducing Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rompaey, Tinne
2013The Development of P + NP + of/to + V(ing) Progressive Aspect Markers. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Vendler, Zeno
1967Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verdaguer, Isabel & Poch, Anna
1998A motivated account of the semantic evolution of watch and its Catalan equivalents. In Historical Linguistics 1997 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 164], Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds), 391–400. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Frederik Theodoor
1963–1973An Historical Syntax of the English Grammar, Vol I–IIIb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
watch, v.”. OED Online. September 2021 Oxford University Press. [URL] (10 September 2021).
Whitt, Richard J.
2011(Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 347–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar