Cover not available
Part of
Reconnecting Form and Meaning: In honour of Kristin Davidse
Edited by Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor and An Van linden
[Studies in Language Companion Series 230] 2023
► pp. 209–236

Chapter 8
A cognitive-functional approach to watch as a verb of perception

| Cardiff University
| Cardiff University
This chapter investigates the semantic and lexico-grammatical profile of watch as an atypical verb of visual perception. Although watch is classified as a behavioural process within Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday 1994; Davidse 2017), it displays features which make it difficult to categorize. We investigate the particular features of watch (including Aktionsart and complement types) through a dataset extracted from COCA (Davies 2008–), in comparison with see as a more typical verb of visual perception. Our results show that watch emerges as an agentive durative transitive verb which typically takes a distinctive event complement. Its unique profile challenges attempts to classify it, providing an example of a verb which appears to be in a fringe “transition area” (Davidse 1999: 303).
Keywords: Aktionsart, perception verbs, watch , telicity, complementation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1 Watch and its comparison with see
    • 2.2Aktionsart and telicity
    • 2.3 Watch as a behavioural process
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Corpus pattern analysis
    • 3.2Additional analysis including telicity
    • 3.3Statistical analyses
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1A semantic profile of watch
    • 4.2Aktionsart
    • 4.3Complementation and telicity
    • 4.4 Watch as a behavioural process
  • 5.Concluding remarks and future research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.230.08chr
References (58)
References
Andreou, Marios & Lieber, Rochelle. 2019. Aspectual and quantificational properties of deverbal conversion and -ing nominalizations. The power of context. English Language and Linguistics 24(2): 333–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano. 2010. As-simultaneity clauses as complements of erception verbs. The case of watch. Textus XXIII(3): 583–602.Google Scholar
Chrispin, Lucy. 2022. A Cognitive Functional Account of Pure Intransitive Verbal Categories and Their Intransitive Patterning. PhD dissertation, Cardiff University.
Davidse, Kristin. 1999. Categories of Experiential Grammar [Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 7]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
. 2017. Systemic Functional Linguistics and the clause. The experiential metafunction. In The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds), 79–95. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2018. A tribute to M. A. K. Halliday (1925–2018). Functions of Language 25(2): 205–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Breban, Tine. 2019. A cognitive-functional approach to the order of adjectives in the English noun phrase. Linguistics 57(2): 327–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Geyskens, Sara. 1998. Have you walked the dog yet? The ergative causativization of intransitives. Word 49(2): 155–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Rymen, Kathleen. 2008. Cognate and locative complements. Their effect on (a)telicity and their semantic relation to the verb. Linguisticae Investigationes 31(2): 256–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA.: 560 million words, 1990–present. <[URL]> (15 September 2021).
Declerck, Renaat, Reed, Susan, & Capelle, Bert. 2006. The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause [Functional Grammar Series 20], 2nd edn, Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela. & Locke, Philip. 2006. English Grammar. A University Course, 2nd edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1977. Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English ‘imperfective’ progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1): 45–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s Ptq. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egan, Thomas. 2008. Non-finite Complementation. A Usage-based Study of Infinitive and -ing Clauses in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Maarouf, Ismaïl. 2013. Methodological aspects of Corpus Pattern Analysis. ICAME 37: 119–148.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin. 2008. Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar. An Extension and Simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise. 2017a. On prepositions and particles. A case for lexical representation in Systemic Functional Linguistics. Word 63(2): 115–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Lexis as most local context. Towards an SFL approach to lexicology. Functional Linguistics 4: 17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, Lise & Schönthal, David. 2019. The rooms of the house. Grammar at group rank. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, Geoff Thompson, Wendy Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds), 118–141. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed.), 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Lexical tectonics. Mapping structural change in patterns of lexification. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41(1): 89–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2018. The Diachrony of Verb Meaning. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas. 2020. Ten Lectures on Event Structure in a Network Theory of Language. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter. 2016. Seeing is believing. Evidentiality and visual perception verbs in early modern English witness depositions. In Studies in the History of the English Language VII. Generalizing vs. Particularizing Methodologies in Historical Linguistic Analysis, Don Chapman, Colette Moore & Miranda Wilcox (eds), 153–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1961/2002. Categories of the theory of grammar. In On Grammar. Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Vol. 1, Jonathan Webster (ed.), 95–105. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 1st edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Matthiessen, Christian 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, Patrick. 2004. Corpus pattern analysis. In Proceedings of the 11th Euralex International Congress, Geoffrey Williams & Sandra Vessier (eds), 87–98. Lorient: UBS.Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick & Pustejovsky, James. 2005. A pattern dictionary for natural language processing. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 10(2): 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1996. The grammarian’s dream. Lexis as most delicate grammar. In Ways of Saying, Ways of Meaning: Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran, David Butt, & Geoffrey Williams (eds), 73–103. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill. 2000. Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ialongo, Cristiano. 2016. Understanding the effect size and its measures. Lessons in biostatistics. Biochemia Medica 26(2): 150–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1: 7–36. <[URL]> (15 September 2021).
Laffut, An & Davidse, Kristin. 2002. English locative constructions. An exercise in neo-Firthian description and dialogue with other schools. Functions of Language 9(2): 169–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2012. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion. The perspective from unaccusativity. In Thematic Structure. Its Role in Grammar, Iggy M. Roca (ed.), 247–270. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do Linguistics with R. Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William. 2021. Neo-Firthian Approaches to Linguistic Typology. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., Matthiessen, Christian and Painter, Claire 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian 1995. Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences.Google Scholar
Monaghan, James. 1979. The Neo-Firthian Tradition and its Contribution to General Linguistics [Linguistische Arbeiten 73]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PDEV. 2014–. Pattern Dictionary of English Verbs. <[URL]> (13 September 2021).
Radden, Günter & Dirven, René. 2007. Cognitive English Grammar [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring Events. A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect [Explorations in Semantics 2]. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rzymski, Christoph, Tresoldi, Tiago, Greenhill, Simon J., et al. 2019. The Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications, reproducible analysis of cross- linguistic polysemies. Scientific Data 7(article 13). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
“see, v.”. OED Online. September 2021. Oxford University Press. <[URL]> (10 September 2021).
Smith, Carlota 1991. The Parameter of Aspect (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy Vol. 43). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rompaey, Tinne. 2013. The Development of P + NP + of/to + V(ing) Progressive Aspect Markers. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verdaguer, Isabel & Poch, Anna. 1998. A motivated account of the semantic evolution of watch and its Catalan equivalents. In Historical Linguistics 1997 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 164], Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds), 391–400. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Frederik Theodoor. 1963–1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Grammar, Vol I–IIIb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
“watch, v.”. OED Online. September 2021. Oxford University Press. <[URL]> (10 September 2021).
Whitt, Richard J. 2011. (Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 347–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar