Part of
Reconnecting Form and Meaning: In honour of Kristin Davidse
Edited by Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor and An Van linden
[Studies in Language Companion Series 230] 2023
► pp. 267298
Broekhuis, Hans
2013Syntax of Dutch. Adjectives and Adjective Phrases. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1998Agnates, verb classes and the meaning of construals. The case of ditransitivity in English. Leuvense Bijdragen 87: 281–313.Google Scholar
2011Alternations as a heuristic to verb meaning and the semantics of constructions. In Morphosyntactic Alternations in English. Functional and Cognitive Perspectives, Pilar Medina Guerrero (ed), 11–37. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
2002The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel
2017Modularity and derivation in Functional Discourse Grammar. D.E.L.T.A. 33(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Portero Muñoz, Carmen
2002Understood objects in functional grammar. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 76. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Center for Language & Communication, Universiteit van AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
García-Velasco, Daniel & Keizer, Evelien
2014Derivational morphology in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Theory and Practice in Functional-cognitive Space [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68], María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds), 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2020The Factive-reported Distinction in English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry A.
1965Linguistics and English Grammar. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1992The inherent semantics of argument structure. The case of the English ditransitive construction. Cognitive Linguistics 3(1): 37–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted. The role of information structure in argument distribution. Language Sciences 23(4–5): 503–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Argument realization. The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In Construction Grammars. Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions [Constructional Approaches to Language 3], Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds), 17–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contreras-García, Lucia & García Velasco, Daniel
2021Interfaces in Functional Discourse Grammar. Theory and applications [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 354]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2004Extending collostructional analysis. A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerrero Medina, Pilar
2020The distribution of verbs and verb classes in the English for-dative alternation. A lexico-paradigmatic approach. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada 19(1): 120–135.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1968Notes on transitivity and theme in English 3. Journal of Linguistics 4: 179–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2014An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2002From speech perception to morphology. Affix-ordering revisited. Language 78(3): 527–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
2011Introduction. Transparency in Functional Discourse Grammar. Linguistics in Amsterdam 4(2): 1–22.Google Scholar
2017A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality. A Functional Perspective, Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 13–37. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet
2003A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2005Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds), 1–68. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honselaar, Wim & Keizer, Evelien
2009Lexicon and frames in FDG. A treatment of Dutch bekend zijn ‘to be familiar, well known’, behandelen ‘to treat’ and trouwen ‘to marry’. Lingua 119(8): 1212–1241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
2008English prepositions in Functional Discourse Grammar. Functions of Language 15(2): 216–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Verb-preposition constructions in Functional Discourse Grammar. Lingua 119(8): 1186–1211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Idiomatic expressions in Functional Discourse Grammar. Linguistics 54(5): 981–1016. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018aInterpersonal adverbs in FDG. The case of frankly . In Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 205], Evelien Keizer & Hella Olbertz (eds), 48–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018bDerivational morphology in FDG. Challenges and implications. Word Structure 11(1): 36–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020The semantics, syntax and prosody of adverbs in English. An FDG perspective. In Grammar and Cognition. Dualistic Models of Language Structure and Language Processing [Human Cognitive Processing 70], Alexander Haselow & Gunther Kaltenböck (eds), 191–231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leufkens, Sterre
2015Transparency in Language. A Typological Study. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics, 2 Vols. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2013aThe family of secondary predications in English. An FDG view. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 67: 43–58.Google Scholar
2013bSpatial adpositions between lexicon and grammar. In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137], J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 67–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1989How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5): 535–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Eynde, Karel
1995Methodological reflections on descriptive linguistics. Knud Togeby’s principles and the pronominal approach. In Studies in Valency, Lene Schøsler & Mary Talbot (eds), 111–131. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar