Chapter 10
On the divergent developments of two German causal subjunctions
Syntactic reanalysis and the evolution of causal meaning
This chapter discusses the development of two German causal subjunctions weil and zumal. In particular, it introduces a new proposal for the syntactic reanalysis of weil in the C0-position from a free relative clause. Later, weil-clauses also underwent a shift in meaning in the course of which weil developed from a temporal into a causal subjunction. The development of temporal into causal meaning is widely-attested cross-linguistically. This chapter argues that in the case of German, the actuation of this general path was probably enabled by prior extensions of the temporal meaning, which had made the subjunction into a universal subjunction of simultaneity relations. The subjunction zumal, by contrast, developed from the combination zumal weil ‘especially since’ after zumal had been reanalyzed in the C0-position. The reanalysis only concerned the internal syntax of the clause. Its external syntax and the meaning remained stable and corresponded to zumal weil-clauses. Based on these findings, it will be argued more generally that the development of new elements in the C0-position takes place through the fusion of the properties of the new and the old C0-elements. After the reanalysis, the new C0-element has the subordinating force of the old C0-element as well as the semantic content of the new and the old C0-element.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Development of the causal subjunction weil ‘because’
- 2.1Weil: syntactic development
- 2.1.1Antecedent origin – shift theory
- 2.1.2Development from free relative clauses
- 2.2Weil: development of causal meaning
- 3.Development of the causal subjunction zumal
- 3.1Zumal: syntactic development
- 3.2Zumal: development of the causal meaning
- 4.Implications and conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
Abbreviations
-
Corpora
-
References
References (52)
Corpora
DeReKo [Das Deutsche Referenzkorpus], on COSMAS IIweb [Corpus Search, Management and Analysis System]. <[URL]>.
DTA [Deutsches Textarchiv]. <[URL]>.
MHDBDB [Mittelhochdeutsche Begriffsdatenbank]. Universität Salzburg. <[URL]>.
References
Arndt, Erwin. 1959. Das Aufkommen des begründenden weil. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (Halle) 81: 388–415.
Arndt, Erwin. 1960. Begründendes da neben weil im Nhd. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (Halle) 82: 242–260.
Axel-Tober, Katrin. 2012. (Nicht-)kanonische Nebensätze im Deutschen. Synchrone und diachrone Aspekte. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Axel-Tober, Katrin. 2017. The development of the declarative complementizer in German. Language 93(2): 136–159.
Bayer, Joseph. 2001. Two grammars in one: Sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics: Tokyo Symposium on South Asian Languages – Contact, Convergence and Typology, Peri Bhaskarorao, Kamuri. V. Subbarao & Rajendra Singh (eds), 11–36. New Delhi: Sage.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2003. Topics in the syntax of the Modern Indo-Aryan languages: Correlative clauses. Ms. <[URL]> (18 April 2021).
Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry. Headed Relative Clauses [Studies in Generative Grammar 46]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Blümel, Andreas & Pitsch, Hagen. 2019. Adverbial clauses: Internally rich, externally null. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 1–29.
BMZ [Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Mit Benutzung des Nachlasses von Georg Friedrich Benecke ausgearbeitet von Wilhelm Müller und Friedrich Zarncke]. Leipzig 1854–1866. <[URL]>.
Bǒsković, Željko & Lasnik, Howard. 2003. On the distribution of null complementizers. Linguistic Inquiry 34(4): 527–546.
Brandner, Ellen & Bräuning, Iris. 2013. Relative wo in Alemannic: Only a complementizer? Linguistische Berichte 234: 131–169.
Breindl, Eva, Volodina, Anna & Waßner, Ulrich H. 2014. Handbuch der deutschen Konnektoren 2: Semantik der deutschen Satzverknüpfer [Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 13]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brovetto, Claudia. 2002. Spanish clauses without complementizer. In Current Issues in Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 220], Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti (eds), 33–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Diewald, Gabriele. 1997. Grammatikalisierung. Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen [Germanistische Arbeitshefte 36]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Doherty, Cathal. 1997. Clauses without complementizers: Finite IP-complementation in English. The Linguistic Review 14: 197–220.
Duden 2006 = Dudenredaktion (eds.). Duden 2006. Die Grammatik. Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch. 7. Nach der neuen Deutschen Rechtschreibung 2006 überarbeiteter Neudruck der 7., völlig neu erarbeiteten und erweiterten Auflage. Band 4. Mannheim: Duden.
DWB [Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob und Wilhelm Grimm]. Leipzig 1854–1961. <[URL]>.
Eberhardt, Ira. 2017. From a focus particle to a conjunction: Diachronic and synchronic analysis of German zumal. Language 93(2): e66–e96.
Ferraresi, Gisella & Weiß, Helmut. 2011. Und nicht nur koordinierend. In Satzverknüpfungen. Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion [Linguistische Arbieten 534], Eva Breindl, Gisella Ferraresi & Anna Volodina (eds), 79–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fuß, Eric. 2021. Wh-relatives in the history of German (and what gender’s got to do with it). Journal of Historical Syntax 5(5): 1–36.
Gagel, Sebastian. 2017. Frühneuhochdeutsche Konnektoren: Entwicklungslinien kausaler Verknüpfungen auf dem Gebiet der Modalität [Studia Linguistica Germanica 131]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geis, Michael L. & Zwicky, Arnold M. 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 2(4): 561–566.
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Economy, innovation, and prescriptivism: From spec to head and head to head. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7: 59–98.
van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP.
Gillmann, Melitta. 2018. Causal inference or conventionalized meaning? A corpus study of the German connector nachdem ‘after’ in regional standard varieties. Folia Linguistica 52(2): 483–522.
Greisinger, Isabella. 2016. Die Unidirektionalität des grammatischen Wandels. Studien zur Diachronie der deutschen, englischen und niederländischen Adverbialsätze im Kontext der Interaktion zwischen Grammatikalisierungsforschung, generativer Grammatik und Indogermanistik. PhD dissertation, Salzburg: Universität Salzburg.
Harbert, Wayne. 1992. Gothic relative clauses and syntactic theory. In On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods [Trends in Linguistics 68], Irmengard Rauch, Gerald Carr, Robert L. Kyes (eds), 109–146. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Harbert, Wayne. 2007. The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: CUP.
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
König, Ekkehard & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and semantic change: The conventionalizing of conversational implicature. In Understanding the Lexicon [Linguistische Arbeiten 210], Werner Hüllen & Rainer Schulze (eds), 110–124. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha. 2020. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Lindwurm, Arnold. 1874. Ein Nachweis, daß die Philosophie, anstatt der Glaubenslehren, die Grundlage unseres socialen Lebens sein muß. Braunschweig: Schwetschke und Sohn.
OED [Oxford English Dictionary]. <[URL]>
Pasch, Renate. 1991. Überlegungen zur Syntax und semantischen Interpretation von w-Interrogativsätzen. Deutsche Sprache 3: 193–213.
Paul, Hermann. 1998. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 24. Auflage überarbeitet von Peter Wiehl und Siegfried Grosse. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Reis, Marga & Rosengren, Inger. 1997. A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: The case of German auch. Journal of Semantics 14: 237–309.
Schmidhauser, Beda. 1995. Kausalität als linguistische Kategorie: Mittel und Möglichkeiten für Begründungen [Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 152]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Skinner, Burrhus F. 1948. ‘Superstition’ in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38(2): 168–172.
Szczepaniak, Renata. 2011. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & König, Ekkehard. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Approaches to Grammaticalization. Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Trotta, Joe & Seppänen, Aimo. 1998. The relative conjunction interface. A study of the syntax of while/whilst in present-day English. English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature 79(4): 349–366.
Wegener, Heide. 2000. Da, denn und weil – der Kampf der Konjunktionen. Zur Grammatikalisierung im kausalen Bereich. In Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis: Aus Anlaß des 60. Geburtstags von Peter Eisenberg, Rolf Thieroff, Matthias Tamrat, Nanna Fuhrhop & Oliver Teuber (eds), 57–69. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Zaefferer, Dietmar. 1991. Conditionals and unconditionals: Cross-linguistic and logical aspects. In Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics [Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics 12], Dietmar Zaefferer (ed.), 210–236. Berlin: Foris.
Zifonun, Gisela. 2001. Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. Der Relativsatz. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.