Combining English auxiliaries

Denison, David

doi:10.1075/slcs.53.07den

Part of

Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English
Edited by Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein
[Studies in Language Companion Series 53] 2000
► pp. 111–147

Combining English auxiliaries

David Denison | University of Manchester

Published online: 13 November 2000

https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.07den

Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Order by:

Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott

2024. Cartography and Explanatory Adequacy,

Eide, Kristin Melum & Marc Fryd

2021. The perfect volume. In The Perfect Volume [Studies in Language Companion Series, 217], ► pp. 1 ff.

Fryd, Marc

2021. From have-omission to supercompounds. In The Perfect Volume [Studies in Language Companion Series, 217], ► pp. 397 ff.

van Trijp, Remi

2017. How a Construction Grammar account solves the auxiliary controversy. Constructions and Frames 9:2 ► pp. 251 ff.

van Trijp, Remi

2019. How a Construction Grammar account solves the auxiliary controversy. In Case Studies in Fluid Construction Grammar [Benjamins Current Topics, 106], ► pp. 79 ff.

Killie, Kristin

2015. The grammaticalization of progressive constructions with a focus on the English progressive. In Historical Linguistics 2013 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 334], ► pp. 213 ff.

Bentein, Klaas

2013. Transitivity, Ecology, and the Emergence of Verbal Periphrasis in Ancient Greek. Classical Philology 108:4 ► pp. 286 ff.

Corrigan, Karen P.

2011. Grammatical variation in Irish English. English Today 27:2 ► pp. 39 ff.

Larroque, Patrice

2007. Had + Have : une étrange construction grammaticale. Anglophonia Caliban/Sigma 11 (22) ► pp. 81 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.