Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Impersonal human reference in Sign Languages
Edited by Gemma Barberà and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
[Sign Language & Linguistics 21:2] 2018
► pp. 183–203
Special issue articles

Impersonal human reference in sign languages

Introduction and questionnaire

| Universitat Pompeu Fabra
| CNRS UMR 7023 | Université Paris 8 (UPL)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Agent-backgrounding devices
  • 3.Readings of R-impersonals
    • 3.1Episodic vs. generalizing readings of R-impersonals
      • 3.1.1Descriptive and prescriptive generic readings of R-impersonals
      • 3.1.2Anchored, vague and inferred existential readings
    • 3.2Inclusive vs. exclusive readings of R-impersonals
    • 3.3Restriction to humans
    • 3.4Domain-restriction and R-impersonals
      • 3.4.1Corporate readings
      • 3.4.2Locative universal readings
    • 3.5Verbs of saying
    • 3.6Conditionals
  • 4.Contributions to this issue
  • 5.R-impersonals questionnaire and methodology
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00017.bar
References (33)
References
Alleesaib, Muhsina & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr. 2013. R(eferential)-impersonals in Mauritian Creole. Talk at Conference of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics , 19–21 June 2013, Lisbon.
Alonso Ovalle, Luis. 2002. Arbitrary pronouns are not that indefinite. In Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Dijkoningen & Paola Monachesi (eds.), Selected papers from Going Romance, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Barberà, Gemma & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr. 2017a. Backgrounded agents in Catalan Sign Language (LSC): passives, middles or impersonals? Language 931. 767–798. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Two indefinite pronouns in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 211. 89–105.Google Scholar
Barberà, Gemma & Josep Quer. 2013. Impersonal reference in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). In Laurence Meurant, Aurélie Sinte, Mieke Van Herreweghe, Myriam Vermeerbergen (eds.), Sign language research, uses and practices: Crossing views on theoretical and applied sign language linguistics, 237–258. Berlin: Ishara Press and De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James. 2003. Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics 391. 473–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1998. Deriving passive without theta roles. In Steven Lapointe, Diane Brentari & Patrick Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 60–99. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia. 2003. Arbitrary readings of third person plural pronominals. In Proceedings of the Conference Sinn und Bedeutung 7, 81–94. Universität Konstanz, FB Linguistik: Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaften Vol 1141. [URL]
. 2006. ‘Arbitrary’ pro and the theory of pro-drop. In Peter Ackema, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 230–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2017. Impersonal passives. In Martin Everaert & Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Vol III1, 1887–1930. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. On si constructions and the theory of arb. Linguistic Inquiry 191. 521–582.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo. 1989. Indefinite and generic pronouns. Proceedings of WCCFL 81. 71–84.Google Scholar
Cuxac, Christian. 2000. La langue des signes française. Les voies de l’iconicité. Faits de langue, vols. 15–161. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Guitteny, Pierre. 2006. Le passif en langue des signes. Bordeaux: Université Bordeaux III. PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry, Barbara O’Dea & Barbara Shaffer. 2001. The construal of events: Passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 1(3). 281–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärde, Sven. 1943. Quelques manières d’exprimer l’idée d’un sujet indéterminé ou général en espagnol. Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckeriaktiebolag.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer. 2006. Passive in the world’s languages. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. I. Clause structure, 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy. 1990. Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL lexicon. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues, 149–175. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato & Adrienne Lehrer. 1990. Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 141. 739–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Devon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 81. 92–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawler, John M. 1972. Generic to a fault. Proceedings of CLS 81. 247–258. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1973. Tracking the generic toad. Proceedings of CLS 91. 320–331. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan & Sigrídur Sigurjónsdóttir. 2002. The new impersonal construction in Icelandic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 51. 97–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, Anna-Lena. 2004. Form and discourse function of the pointing toward the chest in Swedish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 7(1). 3–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özkul, Aslı & Meltem Kelepir. 2015. Passive-like constructions with inanimate themes in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Poster presented at Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory . Barcelona, May 2015.
Partee, Barbara. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns. Journal of Philosophy 70(18). 601–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Risler, Annie. 2016. Parler de soi, parler des autres en langue des signes française. Autopointage et prise de rôle. L’information grammaticale 1491. 45–54. (Special issue Langues des signes: le corps en jeu présence, absence, distance, Annie Risler (ed.)).Google Scholar
Saeed, John I. & Lorraine Leeson. 1999. Detransitivisation in Irish Sign Language. Paper presented at the European Science Foundation Intersign Meeting on Morphosyntax . Siena, March 1999.
Siewierska, Anna. 2011. Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: Man-constructions vs. third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective, 57–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Maria Papastathi. 2011. Towards a typology of third person plural impersonals. Linguistics 491. 575–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sze, Felix. 2010. Is there passive in Hong Kong Sign Language? Poster presentation at TISLR 10. Purdue University.
Tóth, Ildikó. 2000. Inflected infinitives in Hungarian. Tilburg: Katholieke Universiteit Brabant. PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo
2023. Morphology of Passives. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Khristoforova, Evgeniia
2023. Subject agreement in control and modal constructions in Russian Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Kimmelman, Vadim
2022. Argument Structure in Sign Languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Mantovan, Lara
2022. Impersonal subjects in Italian: A comparative analysis of si and third-person plural. Lingua 268 ► pp. 103196 ff. DOI logo
Rissman, Lilia, Laura Horton, Molly Flaherty, Ann Senghas, Marie Coppola, Diane Brentari & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2020. The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognition 203 ► pp. 104332 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.