Squib
Strong pronominals in ASL and LSF?
Theories of pronominal strength (e.g.,
Cardinaletti & Starke 1999)
lead one to expect that sign language, just like spoken language, can have morphologically distinct strong pronominals. We suggest
that American Sign Language (ASL) and French Sign Language (LSF) might have such pronominals, characterized here by the fact that
they may associate with
only even in the absence of prosodically marked focus.
References (6)
References
Bertone, Carmela & Anna Cardinaletti. 2011. Il sistema pronominale della lingua dei segni italiana. In Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati (eds.), Grammatica, lessico e dimensioni di variazione nella LIS, 145–160. Milan: Franco Angeli.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michael Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauser, Charlotte. 2016. Relative clauses in LSF: Typology and analysis. Paris: EHESS-ENS-Paris Descartes MA thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauser, Charlotte & Carlo Geraci. 2017. Relativization strategies in French Sign Language (LSF). Slides of talk given at Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, May 24, 2017.
Schlenker, Philippe, Valentina Aristodemo, Ludovic Ducasse, Jonathan Lamberton & Mirko Santoro. 2016. The unity of focus: Evidence from sign language. Linguistic Inquiry 47(2). 363–381. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlenker, Philippe. 2017. Sign language and the foundations of anaphora. Annual Review of Linguistics 31. 149–177. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)