Cover not available
Part of
Requesting in Social Interaction
Edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 26] 2014
► pp. 35–54

Human agency and the infrastructure for requests

| The University of Sydney & Max Planck Institute Nijmegen

This chapter discusses some of the elements of human sociality that serve as the social and cognitive infrastructure or preconditions for the use of requests and other kinds of recruitments in interaction. The notion of an agent with goals is a canonical starting point, though importantly agency tends not to be wholly located in individuals, but rather is socially distributed. This is well illustrated in the case of requests, in which the person or group that has a certain goal is not necessarily the one who carries out the behavior towards that goal. The chapter focuses on the role of semiotic (mostly linguistic) resources in negotiating the distribution of agency with request-like actions, with examples from video-recorded interaction in Lao, a language spoken in Laos and nearby countries. The examples illustrate five hallmarks of requesting in human interaction, which show some ways in which our ‘manipulation’ of other people is quite unlike our manipulation of tools: (1) that even though B is being manipulated, B wants to help, (2) that while A is manipulating B now, A may be manipulated in return later; (3) that the goal of the behavior may be shared between A and B, (4) that B may not comply, or may comply differently than requested, due to actual or potential contingencies, and (5) that A and B are accountable to one another; reasons may be asked for, and/or given, for the request. These hallmarks of requesting are grounded in a prosocial framework of human agency.

Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.02enf
References
Ahearn, Laura M
2001 “Language and Agency.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 109–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy
2008 Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Social Actions, Social Commitments.” InRoots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Interaction, ed. by N.J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 126–152. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1963 “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (23): 685–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
1990 “Politics and Grammar: Agency in Samoan Political Discourse.” American Ethnologist 17 (4): 646–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 "Agency in Language." In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 451–473. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enfield, N.J
2007 A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.J and Stephen C. Levinson
eds. 2006 Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Enfield, N.J., and Jack Sidnell
2014 “Language Presupposes an Enchronic Infrastructure for Social Interaction.” In The Social Origins of Language: Studies in the Evolution of Language, ed. by Daniel Dor, Chris Knight, and Jerome Lewis, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gell, Alfred
1998 Art and Agency. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2006 “Human Sociality as Mutual Orientation in a Rich Interactive Environment: Multimodal Utterances and Pointing in Aphasia.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Interaction, ed. by N.J Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 97–125. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack
1977 The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin
1995 Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006 “The Distributed Cognition Perspective on Human Interaction.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by N.J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 375–398. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
James, William
1890 The Principles of Psychology. New York: H. Holt and Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul
2007 “Agency.” Current Anthropology 48 (3): 375–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Agent, Person, Subject, Self. A Theory of Ontology, Interaction, and Infrastructure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean
1988 Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
2006 “On the human ‘interaction engine’.” Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by N.J Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 36–69. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
McNeill, David
2005 Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, Donald A
1988 The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pagel, Mark
2012 Wired for Culture: Origins of the Human Social Mind. New York: W.W.Norton.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni
2012 “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49 (5): 426–458. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, and N.J. Enfield
2014 “The Ontology of Action, in Interaction.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by N.J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, and J. Sidnell, 411–433. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy A
1987 Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008 Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley
1949 Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Duranti, Alessandro & Nicco A. La Mattina
2022. The Semiotics of Cooperation. Annual Review of Anthropology 51:1 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Hansen, Jessica Pedersen Belisle
2022. Recruiting repair: Making sense of interpreters’ embodied actions in a video-mediated environment. Discourse Studies 24:6 ► pp. 719 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, John
2016. The Recruitment Matrix. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew
2016. Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Laakso, Minna
2021. Learning to request in interaction. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2023. Directives (with a special emphasis on requests). In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Råman, Joonas
2022. Multimodal Negotiation for the Right to Access Digital Devices Among Elderly Users and Teachers. In Shaping the North Through Multimodal and Intermedial Interaction [Arctic Encounters, ], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.