Part of
Requesting in Social Interaction
Edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 26] 2014
► pp. 5586
References
Austin, John Langshaw
1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy
2007 [1789]An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2002The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014“What Does Grammar Tell Us About Action?” Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S
2006“Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1257–1280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew
2008“Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Judy
1984 “Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing With Potential or Actual Rejection." In Stuctures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Anna V
2013Turn-final or in English: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. Department of English. Madison WI, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Drew, Paul
1978“Accusations: The Use of Members' Knowledge of 'Religious Geography' in Describing Events.” Sociology 12: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984“Speakers' Reportings in Invitation Sequences.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 152–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992 “Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006 “Misalignments Between Caller and Doctor in ‘After-Hours’ Telephone Calls to a British GP's Practice: A Study in Telephone Medicine.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, 416–444. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Traci Walker
2010“Requesting Assistance in Calls to the Police.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard, and A. Johnson, 95–110. London: Rouledge.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1981“How to Make and Understand a Request.” In Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, ed. by H. Parret, M. Sbisa, and J. Verschueren, 195–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A
2007“Principles Shaping Grammatical Practices: An Exploration.” Discourse Studies 9: 299–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1979“The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation." In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by G. Psathas, 97-121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
1984“Notes on Story Structure and the Organization of Participation.” In Structures of Social Action, ed by J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 225–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1986 “Gesture As a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.Semiotica 62(1/2): 29–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Things and Their Embodied Environments”. In The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting the Boundaries of the Mind, ed. by L. Malafouris and C. Renfrew, 103–120. Cambridge, McDonald Institute Monographs (David Brown Book Co).Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Goodwin
Gordon, David, and George Lakoff
1975“Conversational Postulates.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, ed. by P. Cole, and J. Morgan, 83–106. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine
2006“‘Will You or Can't You?’: Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1081–1104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2002“The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1427–1446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012“The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel
1977Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1979“Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981“The Essential Inadequacies of Speech Act Models of Dialogue.” In Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, ed. by H. Parret, M. Sbisa, and J. Verschueren, 473–492. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013“Action Formation and Ascription.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna
1997Designing Social Actions: Grammar, Prosody and Interaction in Swedish Conversation, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Californa Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M
1978“Attributions of Responsibility: Blamings.” Sociology 12: 115–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984“Giving a Source or Basis: The Practice in Conversation of Telling ‘What I Know’.” Journal of Pragmatics 8 (4): 607–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988“Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy.” Communication Monographs 55: 360–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni
2012“Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? In Italian.” Discourse Processes 49: 426–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1980“Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ‘Can I Ask You A Question’. Sociological Inquiry 50: 104–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation. In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 28–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988“Pre-Sequences and Indirection: Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 12: 55–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992“Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided for Place for the Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (5): 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975“Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R
(1979) Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge, Cambrdige University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
Eds. (2001) Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam, Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2012“Establishing Joint Decisions in a Dyad.” Discourse Studies 14 (6): 779–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Perakyla
2012“Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005“The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction.” Discourse Studies 7: 481–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
Forthcoming. Grammar and Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Wootton, Anthony
1981aChildren's Use of Address Terms. In Adult-Child Conversations, ed. by P. French, and M. MacLure, 42–58. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1981b“Two Request Forms for Four Year Olds.” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 511–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 80 other publications

Alshammari, Bandar & Michael Haugh
2024. Troubles-Complaints and the Overall Structural Organization of Troubles-Remedy Sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction 57:2  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Anderson, Rebecca J, Patrick C Stone, Joseph T S Low & Steven Bloch
2020. Managing uncertainty and references to time in prognostic conversations with family members at the end of life: A conversation analytic study. Palliative Medicine 34:7  pp. 896 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. An Algorithm for Autonomous Co-constituting in Conjoint Co-constituting. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Transcription Conventions. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjoint Co-constituting’s Implications. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjoint Co-constituting, Constituting Face, and Future Research. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 392 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjointly Co-constituting Relating. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Researching Relating and Face in Everyday Interacting. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. What Is Individual in Communicating. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. What Is Social in Communicating. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Communicating & Relating, DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Two Projects. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjointly Co-constituting Relating and Face in Everyday Interacting. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Face Constituting Theory. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. The Conjoint Co-constituting Model of Communicating. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. An Alternate Representation of Conjoint Co-constituting. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2020. Conjointly Co-constituting the Social and the Individual in Communicating. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Baranova, Julija & Mark Dingemanse
2016. Reasons for requests. Discourse Studies 18:6  pp. 641 ff. DOI logo
Bernard, Mathieu, Claudia Gamondi, Anca-Cristina Sterie, Philip J Larkin, Ralf Jox & Gian Domenico Borasio
2024. Interdisciplinary research approach based on a mixed-methods design to explore patient altruism at the end of life: a study protocol. BMJ Open 14:5  pp. e085632 ff. DOI logo
Bloch, Steven & Charles Antaki
2022. How professionals deal with clients’ explicit objections to their advice. Discourse Studies 24:4  pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Clayman, Steven E & Heidi Kevoe-Feldman
2023. Dispatching First Responders: Language Practices and the Dispatcher’s Operational Role in Radio Encounters With Police Officers. Discourse & Society 34:5  pp. 547 ff. DOI logo
Clayman, Steven E. & Laura Loeb
2018. Polar Questions, Response Preference, and the Tasks of Political Positioning in Journalism. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:2  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf & Alexandra Gubina
2021. Positionally-sensitive action-ascription. Interactional Linguistics 1:2  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Diepeveen, Aafke, Jan Svennevig & Paweł Urbanik
2022. Suspects’ opportunities to claim their legal rights in police investigative interviews. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 28:2 DOI logo
Fasulo, Alessandra
2021. Chapter 3. Talking to children with atypical development. In Language and Social Interaction at Home and School [Dialogue Studies, 32],  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Harjunpää, Katariina
2021. Brokering co-participants’ volition in request and offer sequences. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326],  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2024. Chapter 7. Ostensible offers, politeness and sincere hypocrisy. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343],  pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Henderson, Gates
2021. Deontics at bedtime. Research on Children and Social Interaction 4:2 DOI logo
Heritage, John
2016. The Recruitment Matrix. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, John & Chase Wesley Raymond
2021. Preference and Polarity: Epistemic Stance in Question Design. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Hiramoto, Takeshi
2024. Framing offer-related actions as assistance at jewelry stores in Japan. Discourse Studies DOI logo
Hofstetter, Emily & Elizabeth Stokoe
2015. Offers of assistance in politician–constituent interaction. Discourse Studies 17:6  pp. 724 ff. DOI logo
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2023. Requêtes et gestion de l’expertise en contexte institutionnel : l’accomplissement multimodal des demandes de révision dans les salons de coiffure. Langage et société N° 179:2  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Humă, Bogdana, Jack B. Joyce & Geoffrey Raymond
2023. What Does “Resistance” Actually Look Like? The Respecification of Resistance as an Interactional Accomplishment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 42:5-6  pp. 497 ff. DOI logo
Humă, Bogdana, Elizabeth Stokoe & Rein Ove Sikveland
2020. Putting persuasion (back) in its interactional context. Qualitative Research in Psychology 17:3  pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Iversen, Clara & Heidi Kevoe‐Feldman
2024. The subjective and objective side of helplessness: Navigating between reassurance and risk management when people seek help for suicidal others. British Journal of Social Psychology DOI logo
Kendrick, Kobin H. & Paul Drew
2016. Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kent, Alexandra & Kobin H. Kendrick
2016. Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3  pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Kuroshima, Satomi
2023. When a request turn is segmented: Managing the deontic authority via early compliance. Discourse Studies 25:1  pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Laakso, Minna
2021. Learning to request in interaction. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326],  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Li, Hui & Jie Ji
2023. Native observers’ evaluations of ritual frame indicating expressions in Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2  pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Liang, Hongyan
2021. Absent appreciation in Mandarin Chinese interaction. East Asian Pragmatics 6:2 DOI logo
Lindholm, Camilla, Jenny Paananen, Melisa Stevanovic, Elina Weiste & Taina Valkeapää
2024. Requests for concrete actions in interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 34:2  pp. 190 ff. DOI logo
Lindwall, Oskar, Gustav Lymer & Jonas Ivarsson
2016. Epistemic status and the recognizability of social actions. Discourse Studies 18:5  pp. 500 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Shu
2020. Displaying entitlement. East Asian Pragmatics 5:3  pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Lynch, Michael & Jean Wong
2016. Reverting to a hidden interactional order: Epistemics, informationism, and conversation analysis. Discourse Studies 18:5  pp. 526 ff. DOI logo
Magnusson, Simon
2020. Constructing young citizens’ deontic authority in participatory democracy meetings. Discourse & Communication 14:6  pp. 600 ff. DOI logo
Mandelbaum, Jenny, Darcey deSouza, Wan Wei & Kaicheng Zhan
2022. Micro-moments of social support: Self-service-occasioned offers at the family dinner table. Communication Monographs 89:3  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Monteiro, David, Oriana Rainho Brás & Michel Binet
2024. Time-oriented decisions in Palliative Care team meetings. Discourse Studies DOI logo
Muntigl, Peter, Adam O. Horvath, Lynda Chubak & Lynne Angus
2020. Getting to “Yes”: Overcoming Client Reluctance to Engage in Chair Work. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
NAKAGAWA, Atsushi
2022. Conversation Analysis of Calls in Long-distance Caregiving. Japanese Sociological Review 73:2  pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Nilsson, Elin & Anna Olaison
2022. Persuasion in practice: Managing diverging stances in needs assessment meetings with older couples living with dementia. Qualitative Social Work 21:6  pp. 1123 ff. DOI logo
Nissi, Riikka
2016. Spelling out consequences: Conditional constructions as a means to resist proposals in organisational planning process. Discourse Studies 18:3  pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Nissi, Riikka & Kati Dlaske
2020. Empowerment as an affective-discursive technology in contemporary capitalism: insights from a play. Critical Discourse Studies 17:4  pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Nissi, Riikka & Heidi Hirsto
2023. Policing language in the world of new work: the commodification of workplace communication in organizational consulting. Applied Linguistics Review 14:4  pp. 775 ff. DOI logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2023. La requête dans les interactions institutionnelles : une introduction. Langage et société N° 179:2  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Rae, John P. & Monica Ramey
2020. Making and Taking Opportunities for Co-participation in an Interaction Between a Boy with Autism Spectrum Disorder and His Father. In Atypical Interaction,  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Rae, John P. & Monica Ramey
2020. Correction and repair: a comparative analysis of a boy with ASD interacting with a parent and with an ABA trainer. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 34:10-11  pp. 1018 ff. DOI logo
Raymond, Chase Wesley & Anne Elizabeth Clark White
2017. Time Reference in the Service of Social Action. Social Psychology Quarterly 80:2  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Raymond, Geoffrey, Lillian Jungleib, Don Zimmerman & Nikki Jones
2022. Rules and Policeable Matters. In The Ethnomethodology Program,  pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Raymond, Geoffrey & Don H Zimmerman
2016. Closing matters: Alignment and misalignment in sequence and call closings in institutional interaction. Discourse Studies 18:6  pp. 716 ff. DOI logo
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2023. Directives (with a special emphasis on requests). In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Stivers, Tanya, John Heritage, Rebecca K. Barnes, Rose McCabe, Laura Thompson & Merran Toerien
2018. Treatment Recommendations as Actions. Health Communication 33:11  pp. 1335 ff. DOI logo
Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell
2016. Proposals for Activity Collaboration. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:2  pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Sørensen, Søren Sandager
2021. Affiliating in Second Position: Response Tokens with Rising Pitch in Danish. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:1  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Tennent, Emma
2021. ‘I’m calling in regard to my son’: Entitlement, obligation, and opportunity to seek help for others. British Journal of Social Psychology 60:3  pp. 870 ff. DOI logo
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Chase Wesley Raymond
2021. The grammar of proposals for joint activities. Interactional Linguistics 1:1  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Thunman, Elin, Mats Ekström & Anders Bruhn
2020. Dealing With Questions of Responsiveness in a Low-Discretion Context: Offers of Assistance in Standardized Public Service Encounters. Administration & Society 52:9  pp. 1333 ff. DOI logo
Tuomenoksa, Asta, Suzanne Beeke & Anu Klippi
2023. People with aphasia and their family members proposing joint future activities in everyday conversations: A conversation analytic study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 58:2  pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Weatherall, Ann
2020. Constituting agency in the delivery of telephone-mediated victim support. Qualitative Research in Psychology 17:3  pp. 396 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Yaxin & Shuai Yang
2022. Power plays in action formation: The TCU-final particle ba (吧) in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Discourse Studies 24:4  pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
Wåhlin-Jacobsen, Christian Dyrlund & Johan Simonsen Abildgaard
2020. Only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches? Deontics and epistemics in discussions of health and well-being in participatory workplace settings. Discourse & Communication 14:1  pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Guodong, Yaxin Wu, Paul Drew & Chase Wesley Raymond
2024. The DIG Mandarin Conversations (DMC) Corpus. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 15:1  pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yanhong & Guodong Yu
2020. The sequential environments of positive assessments as responsive actions in Mandarin daily interaction. East Asian Pragmatics 5:3  pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Zinken, Jörg & Giovanni Rossi
2016. Assistance and Other Forms of Cooperative Engagement. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:1  pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
刘, 亚丹
2024. A Comparing of Two Requesting Forms Used by Child—“Wo Xiang/Yao” and “(Ni) Nengbuneng”. Modern Linguistics 12:02  pp. 627 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Series Editor Preface. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Introduction. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. xvii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Note on Sources. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Copyright Page. In Communicating & Relating,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.