Cover not available
Part of
Imperative Turns at Talk: The design of directives in action
Edited by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 30] 2017
► pp. 1–24

Chapter 1
Imperative turns at talk

An introduction

| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
Article outline
  • 1.Prior research
  • 2.Profile of the volume
  • 3.Imperative turns: Conceptual issues
    • 3.1Variation in imperative forms
      • Morphological vs. syntactic marking
      • Singular vs. plural marking
      • Familiar vs. formal (T/V) marking
      • Aspect
    • 3.2Imperatives in their turns
    • 3.3Pragmatic dimensions of directive situations
      • The participation framework
      • The relation of the nominated action to the on-going activity
      • The degree of immediacy or urgency of the action nominated
      • The deontic rights and responsibilities of the participants
    • 3.4Imperative turns, actions, and sequences
  • 4.Structure of the volume
  • Author queries
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.01sor
References (38)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper (eds). 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter. 2010. “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2014. “Requesting – From Speech Act to Recruitment”. In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 2007. “Principles Shaping Grammatical Practices: An Exploration.” Discourse Studies 9 (3): 299–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukushima, Saeko. 2000. Requests and Culture. Politeness in British English and Japanese. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1979. “Footing.” Semiotica 25: 1–29. Reprinted in Forms of Talk (1981), by Erving Goffman, 124–159. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Interactive Footing”. In Reporting talk. Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2000. “Participation”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9 (1–2): 177–181.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 2004. “Participation”. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 222–244. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, Leo, and Miranda Stewart. 2005. Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark, and Mikhail Kissine. 2014. Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew. 2016. “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kent, Alexandra, and Kobin H. Kendrick. 2016. “Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (3): 272–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, and Tiina Keisanen. 2012. “Linguistic and Embodied Formats for Making (Concrete) Offers.” Discourse Studies 14 (5): 587–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffry N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Márquez Reiter, Rosina. 2000. Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay. A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. “The Situated Organization of Directives in French: Imperatives and Action Coordination in Video Games.” Nottingham French Studies 50 (2): 19–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva. 2009. “Politeness and Indirectness Across Cultures. A Comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian Requests.” Journal of Politeness Research 5 (2): 189–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2012. “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49 (5): 426–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salgado, Elizabeth Flores. 2011. The Pragmatics of Requests and Apologies: Developmental Patterns of Mexican Students. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts”. In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and J. L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Pragmatics: A Reader, ed. by S. Davis (1991), 265–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 1992. Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa. 2011. “Participants’ Deontic Rights and Action Formation: The Case of Declarative Requests for Action.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures 52. ([URL])
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2012. “Deontic Authority in Interaction. The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Ludo Lejeune (with Umarani Pappuswamy, Valentin Goussev). 2013a. “The Morphological Imperative”. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL], Accessed on 2016-05-01.)
van der Auwera, Johan, and Ludo Lejeune (with Valentin Goussev). 2013b. “The Prohibitive”. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL], Accessed on 2016-05-01.)
van der Auwera, Johan, Nina Dobrushina, and Valentin Goussev. 2013. “Imperative-Hortative Systems”. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL], Accessed on 2016-05-01.)
Vine, Bernadette. 2004. Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1985. “Different Cultures, Different Languages, Different Speech Acts: Polish vs. English.” Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Cross Cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Second edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xrakovskij, Victor S. (ed). 2001. Typology of Imperative Constructions. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg. 2016. Requesting Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Eva Ogiermann. 2013. “Responsibility and Action: Invariants and Diversity in Requests for Objects in British English and Polish Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 256–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Riou, Marine, Karim Tazarourte, Delphine Hugenschmitt, Christian Di Filippo & Pierre-Yves Gueugniaud
2023. Faire faire les gestes qui sauvent : requêtes des régulateurs pour guider les appelants dans des appels d’urgence médicale en France. Langage et société N° 179:2 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Weiser-Zurmühlen, Kristin
2022. How to Get a Grip on Processes of Communalization and Distinction in Group Interactions—An Analytical Framework. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Hilla Polak-Yitzhaki, Xiaoting Li, Ioana Maria Stoenica, Martin Havlík & Leelo Keevallik
2021. Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Betz, Emma, Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm & Peter Golato
2020. Chapter 1. Mobilizing others. In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Muntigl, Peter, Adam O. Horvath, Lynda Chubak & Lynne Angus
2020. Getting to “Yes”: Overcoming Client Reluctance to Engage in Chair Work. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Stevanovic, Melisa
2020. Chapter 5. Mobilizing student compliance. In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen, Veronika Drake, Andrea Golato & Emma Betz
2020. Chapter 3. Mobilizing for the next relevant action. In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2020. Chapter 5. English why don’t you X as a formulaic expression. In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Bodnaruk, Elena, Larisa Reznichenko, S. Cindori, O. Larouk, E.Yu. Malushko, L.N. Rebrina & N.L. Shamne
2019. Paradigmatics, semantics and pragmatics of the imperative in German. SHS Web of Conferences 69 ► pp. 00023 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.