In Danish talk-in-interaction, imperative verbs often occur together with modal particles. This paper investigates three such combinations of imperatives and modal particles. We argue that the combinations are best understood as separate social action formats performing different actions in specific interactional contexts, rather than as modifications or modalizations of an imperative. The modal particles (bare and lige) investigated are the ones that occur most frequently with imperatives in our data. Both might on some occasions be translated into ‘just’ in English, but they are not synonymous in Danish. The investigated actions formats are: (1) imperative+lige, which is used to perform a request for an action that is portrayed as being part of a common project, (2) imperative+bare, which is used to grant permission, and (3) bare+imperative, which is used to advise the recipient to carry out a specific action as a solution to a problem. The action formats are designed to show consideration of the recipient’s benefits of the proposed actions in specific ways, and they make differential claims of entitlement, deontic authority, and moral accountability. As a more general point, we propose that an approach to grammatical formats that begins with the actual use of combinations of words and structures in interactional contexts, is more revealing than starting with a default understanding of the interactional function of a grammatical structure (for instance, that the imperative has a “commanding” function) and then see combinations with other words and structures as modifications of this default function.
2006 “ ‘Will You or Can’t You?’: Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1081–1104.
Heinemann, Trine
2009 “Two Answers to Inapposite Inquiries.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 159–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinemann, Trine
2016 “From Looking to Seeing: Indexing Delayed Intelligibility of an Object with the Danish Change-of-state Token n↑å↓:” Journal of Pragmatics 104: 108–132.
Heinemann, Trine, Anna Lindström, and Jakob Steensig
2011 “Addressing Epistemic Incongruence in Question-Answer Sequences Through the Use of Epistemic Adverbs.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 107–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinemann, Trine, and Jakob Steensig
Forthcoming. “Justifying Departures from Progressivity: The Danish Turn-initial Particle altså.” In At the Intersection of Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial Particles Across Languages ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen Amsterdam/Philadelphia John Benjamins
Heinemann, Trine, and Jakob Steensig
In preparation. “Seeing it our way versus seeing it my way – Two formats for mobilizing joint attention to an object in Danish talk-in-interaction..”
Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi
1992 “Dilemmas of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions Between Health Visitors and Firsttime Mothers”. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 359–417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack
2005 “The Scandinavian Languages.” In Comparative Syntax, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, and Richard S. Kayne, 420–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holt, Elizabeth
1996 “Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 219–245.
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke
1987Establishing Agreement: An Analysis of Proposal-acceptance Sequences. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam. Dordrecht: Foris.
Jefferson, Gail
1984 “Notes on Some Orderlinesses of Overlap Onset.” In Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, ed. by Valentina D’Urso, and Paolo Leonardi, 11–38. Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.
1981 “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles Telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter.’” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 399–422.
2017 “Accepting Remote Proposals.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Naturalistic Studies of Talk-in-interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, ed. by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rossi, Giovanni
2012 “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 49: 426–458.
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation. Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1998 “Body Torque.” Social Research 65 (3): 535–596.
Sidnell, Jack
2007 “ ‘Look’-prefaced Turns in First and Second Position: Launching, Interceding and Redirecting Action.” Discourse Studies 9 (3): 387–408.
2014 “The Social and Moral Work of Modal Constructions in Granting Remote Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 145–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Steensig, Jakob, and Trine Heinemann
In preparation. “Pursuing Imperative Compliance: The Case of Danish Imperative+nu.”
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321.
Stivers, Tanya
2004 “ ‘No no no’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research 30 (2): 260–293.
2023. Multimodal methods for managing deontic rights in interdisciplinary trials. Multimodality & Society 3:4 ► pp. 399 ff.
Steensig, Jakob, Maria Jørgensen, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen & Søren Sandager Sørensen
2023. Toward a Grammar of Danish Talk-in-Interaction: From Action Formation to Grammatical Description. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:2 ► pp. 116 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.