Cover not available
Part of
Imperative Turns at Talk: The design of directives in action
Edited by Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Studies in Language and Social Interaction 30] 2017
► pp. 175–211

Chapter 6
Requests for here-and-now actions in Russian conversation

This chapter examines interactional dimensions of requests for material objects and other immediate practical actions in Russian conversation, focusing on the most common form these requests take – imperative verb constructions. Even though the Russian language has a rich variety of constructions for performing requests, imperative requests are ubiquitous across situations and settings. This predominance of imperative requests in Russian appears to be quite unique cross-linguistically, as the majority of studied languages use imperative requests less frequently and only under limited pragmatic conditions. Using video recordings of interactions between family and friends, this chapter shows that “plain” – i.e., unadorned or unelaborated – imperatives are a default or unmarked request form for here-and-now actions. This argument is supported, on the one hand, by a numerical prevalence of imperative requests across various interactional configurations, and, on the other hand, by how agreeing responses to different request constructions are produced. The analysis shows that imperative requests convey a presumption of the addressee’s compliance and availability, and request responses are designed to corroborate or reassert this presumption, enacting and renewing an expectation of willing and unquestionable assistance. Overall, the study advances our understanding of language‑ and culture-specific variations in the organization of collaboration and assistance in social interaction.

Keywords: Russian , imperative , Conversation Analysis , requests , collaborative action , diminutive morphology , politeness , directives , deontic stance , please
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data
  • 3.Russian imperative as a morphological form
  • 4.Plain imperatives
    • 4.1Advancing a collaborative activity: bilateral requests
    • 4.2Contiguous and non-contiguous requests
      • 4.2.1Low-cost actions: Addressee has committed to the activity
      • 4.2.2High-cost actions: Addressee has not committed to the activity
  • 5.Modulating imperative requests
    • 5.1Using diminutive morphology
    • 5.2Using pozhaluysta ‘please’
  • 6.Modulating requests via extended turn designs
  • 7.Interrogative request forms
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 18 August 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.06bol
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2010 Imperatives and commands: Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles, and Alexandra Kent
2012 “Telling People What to Do (and, Sometimes, Why): Contingency, Entitlement and Explanation in Staff Requests to Adults with Intellectual Impairments.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 876–889. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baranova, Julija, and Mark Dingemanse
In press. “Accounts for Requests in Russian Interaction.” Discourse Studies.
Benacchio, Rosanna
2002 “Конкуренция видов, вежливость и этикет в Русском императиве [Aspectual competition, politeness and etiquette in the Russian imperative].” Russian Linguistics 26 (2): 146–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Vid i kategorii vezhlivosti v slavianskom imperative: Sravnitelʹnyi analiz. [Aspect and categories of politeness in Slavic imperative: A comperative analysis]. Berlin: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Birjulin, Leonid A, and Viktor S. Xrakovskij
2001 “Imperative Sentences: Theoretical Problems.” In Typology of Imperative Constructions, ed. by Viktor S. Xrakovskij, 3–50. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina B.
2008 “Reopening Russian Conversations: The Discourse Particle -to and the Negotiation of Interpersonal Accountability in Closings.” Human Communication Research 34: 99–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. “Nu-prefaced Responses in Russian Conversation.” In At the Intersection of Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial Particles Across Languages ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen Amsterdam John Benjamins
2016 “A Simple da?: Affirming Responses to Polar Questions in Russian Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 100: 40–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope
2010 “Questions and Their Responses in Tzeltal.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2627–2648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
2014 “Benefactors and Beneficiaries: Benefactive Status and Stance in the Management of Offers and Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014 “What Does Grammar Tell Us about Action?” Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter
2010 “Directives: Entitlement and Contingency in Action.” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S, and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorodnych, Anatoly
1995 “A Study of Requests in English, Russian and Ukrainian.” Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 30: 55–63.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2014a “Requesting – From Speech Act to Recruitment.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(eds) 2014b Requesting in social interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durst-Andersen, Per
1995 “Imperative Frames and Modality: Direct vs. Indirect Speech Acts in Russian, Danish, and English.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (6): 611–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, N. J. Enfield, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Mark Dingemanse, Kobin H. Kendrick, and Jörg Zinken
2014 “Recruitments across Languages: A Systematic Comparison.” Talk presented at the 4th International Conference on Conversation Analysis [ICCA 2014], University of California, Los Angeles, June 25–29, 2014.Google Scholar
Forsyth, James
1970 A Grammar of Aspect: Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1978 “Response Cries.” Language 54: 787–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, Trine
2006 “ ‘Will You or Can’t You?’: Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (7): 1081–1104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2010 “Minimal Answers to Yes/No Questions in the Service of Sequence Organization.” Discourse Studies 12 (3): 283–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
2016 “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
2003 “Selecting Next Speaker: The Context-sensitive Operation of a Context-free Organization.” Language in Society 32 (2): 177–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna
2005 “Language as Social Action: A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny S.
2014 “How to Do Things With Requests: Request Sequences at the Family Dinner Table.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 215–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mills, Margaret Hill
1991 “The Performance Force of the Interrogative in Colloquial Russian: From Direct to Indirect Speech Acts.” The Slavic and East European Journal 35 (4): 553–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “Conventionalized Politeness in Russian Requests: A Pragmatic View of Indirectness.” Russian Linguistics 16 (1): 65–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva
2009 “Politeness and In-directness Across Cultures: A Comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian Requests.” Journal of Politeness Research 5: 189–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Type Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68: 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni
2012 “Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives and Mi X? Interrogatives in Italian.” Discourse Processes 46 (5): 426–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Request System in Italian Interaction.” PhD doctoral dissertation, Radboud University.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2000 “On Turns’ Possible Completion, More or Less: Increments and Trail-offs.” Annual Conference of the National Communication Association, Seattle, Washington, November, 2000.Google Scholar
2004 “On Dispensability.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 95–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shmelev, Dmitrii Nikolaevich
2002 “O znachenii vida v povelitel’nom naklonenii [About the meaning of aspect in the imperative].” In Izbrannye trudy po russkomu jazyku, 271–279. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2001 “Simple Answers to Polar Questions: The Case of Finnish.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret Selting, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 405–431. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2004 “"No No No" and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research 30 (2): 260–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Morality and Question Design: ‘Of Course’ as Contesting a Presupposition of Askability.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 82–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J.
1997 Interaction and the Development of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “A Puzzle about Please: Repair, Increments, and Related Matters in the Speech of a Young Child.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 40 (2–3): 171–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xrakovskij, Viktor S.
1988 “Императивные формы НСВ и СВ в русском языке и их употребление [Imperative forms of imperfective and perfective aspect in Russian and their use].” Russian Linguistics 12 (3): 269–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg
2015 “Contingent Control over Shared Goods. ‘Can I have x’ Requests in British English Informal Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 82: 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Requesting Responsibility: The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, and Eva Ogiermann
2013 “Responsibility and Action: Invariants and Diversity in Requests for Objects in British English and Polish Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (3): 256–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Bolden, Galina B.
2023. Chapter 2. Repetitional responses to polar questions in Russian conversation. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Bolden, Galina B., John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2023. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Clayman, Steven E & Heidi Kevoe-Feldman
2023. Dispatching First Responders: Language Practices and the Dispatcher’s Operational Role in Radio Encounters With Police Officers. Discourse & Society 34:5 ► pp. 547 ff. DOI logo
Durst-Andersen, Per & Xia Zhang
2021. Chinese as a Mother Tongue in the Context of Global English Business Communication. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Durst-Andersen, Per & Xia Zhang
2022. Chinese as a Mother Tongue in the Context of Global English Business Communication. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 935 ff. DOI logo
Durst-Andersen, Per & Xia Zhang
2022. Chinese as a Mother Tongue in the Context of Global English Business Communication. In The Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language Studies, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Golato, Peter
2020. Chapter 4. Recruitments in French. In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Hoey, Elliott M.
2022. Self-authorizing action: Onlet me Xin English social interaction. Language in Society 51:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Stephanie Hyeri & Mary Shin Kim
2020. Chapter 2. Requesting here-and-now actions with two imperative formats in Korean interaction. In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Mustajoki, Arto & Alla Baikulova
2020. The risks of misunderstandings in family discourse. Language and Dialogue 10:3 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Mustajoki, Arto & Alla Baikulova
2022. Avoidance of cognitive efforts as a risk factor in interaction. Discourse Studies 24:3 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Raymond, Chase Wesley
2022. Suffixation and sequentiality. Interactional Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rudneva, Ekaterina
2019. How Russians pre-request and seek assistance: a study of interaction in two communities of practice. Russian Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen, Veronika Drake, Andrea Golato & Emma Betz
2020. Chapter 3. Mobilizing for the next relevant action. In Mobilizing Others [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 33], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Urbanik, Paweł
2020. Getting others to share goods in Polish and Norwegian: Material and moral anchors for request conventions. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.