Everyone agrees that a computer could never understand and appreciate literature, but the fields of computational linguistics and discourse processing have made important advances in automatic detection of language and discourse characteristics. We have analyzed literary texts and political speeches with two computer tools, namely Coh-Metrix and Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC). Coh-Metrix provides hundreds of measures that funnel into 5 principal components: word concreteness, syntactic simplicity, referential cohesion, deep cohesion, and narrativity. LIWC classifies words on 80 categories, such as first person pronouns, negative emotions, and social words. This paper illustrates how computer tools can unveil new insights about literature and can empirically test claims by literary scholars and social scientists. Our approach offers a computational science of literature.
Samadi, Mohammad Amin, Spencer Jaquay, Yiwen Lin, Elham Tajik, Seehee Park & Nia Nixon
2024. Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, ► pp. 885 ff.
Junker, Christine R., Mark S. Cubberley & Stephen J. Jacquemin
2022. Swirling currents. Scientific Study of Literature 12:1-2 ► pp. 28 ff.
SURIÁ MARTÍNEZ, Raquel
2018. Intercambiando experiencias en grupos online: análisis del estado emocional de los padres de hijos con discapacidad. Siglo Cero. Revista Española sobre Discapacidad Intelectual 49:2 ► pp. 59 ff.
Jacobs, Arthur M., Sarah Schuster, Shuwei Xue & Jana Lüdtke
2015. A Coh-metrix Study of Writings by Majors of Mechanic Engineering in the Vocational College. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:9 ► pp. 1929 ff.
Windsor, Leah C., Nia Dowell & Art Graesser
2014. The Language of Autocrats: Leaders' Language in Natural Disaster Crises. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 5:4 ► pp. 446 ff.
Murray, Tom, Xiaoxi Xu & Beverly Park Woolf
2013. An Exploration of Text Analysis Methods to Identify Social Deliberative Skill. In Artificial Intelligence in Education [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7926], ► pp. 811 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.