Article published in:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp. 94127
References

References

Appel, M., & Richter, T.
(2007) Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10, 113–134. Crossref
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M.
(2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation of the role of emotional transportation. PLOS ONE, 8, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S.
(2004) The empathy quotient. An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I.
(2001) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 42, 241–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L.
(1997) Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 105–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L.
(1991) Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. E., & Barnes, J. L.
(2015) The effects of reading material on social and non-social cognition. Poetics, 52, 32–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. E., Capps, S. C., & Barnes, J. L.
(2018) Fiction, genre exposure and moral reality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 12, 328–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, D., & Greitemeyer, T.
(2015) Immersed in virtual worlds and minds: Effects of in-game storytelling on immersion, need satisfaction, and affective theory of mind. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 646–652. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H.
(2008) Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cadwell, O. G.
(2015) Literary fiction’s influence on social cognitive brain activity. Proceedings of the National Conference on Undergraduate Research (pp. 570–574). Cheney, WA: Eastern Washington University.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T. -H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Navé, M., Nosek, B., Pfeiffer, T., Altmejd, A., Buttrick, N., Chan, T., Chen, Y., Forsell, E., Gampa, A., Heikensten, E., Hummer, L., Imai, T., … Wu, H.
(2018) Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 637–644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Castano, E.
(2012) Anti-social behavior in individuals and groups: An empathy-focused approach. In K. Deux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 419–445). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S.
(1987) The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium, 5. (pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.
(1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2001) Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 245–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Constanzo, M., & Archer, D.
(1993) The Interpersonal Perception Task-15 (IPT-15): A guide for researchers and teachers. Unpublished Manual.Google Scholar
Davis, M.
(1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H.
(1980) A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 1–19. http://​www​.uv​.es​/~friasnav​/Davis​_1980​.pdf
Davis, M. H., Mitchell, K. V., Hall, J. A., Lothert, J., Snapp, T., & Meyer, M.
(1999) Empathy, expectations, and situational preferences: Personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors. Personality, 67, 469–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, W. J.
(2012) Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39, 802–823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Mulder, H. N. M., Hakemulder, F., van den Berghe, R., Klassen, F., & van Berkum, J. J. A.
(2017) Effects of exposure to literary narrative fiction: From book smart to street smart? Scientific Study of Literature, 7, 129–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K.
(2014) The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes in the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8, 498–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dodell-Feder, D., Lincoln, S. H., Coulson, J. P., & Hooker, C. I.
(2013) Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: A new task for assessing theory of mind in adults. PLOS ONE, 8, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dodell-Feder, D. & Tamir, D. I.
(2018) Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1713–1727. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duval, C., Piolino, P., Bejanin, A., Eustache, F., & Desgranges, B.
(2010) Age effects on different components of theory of mind. Consciousness and Cognition 20, 627–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. -G., & Buchner, A.
(2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E.
(2013) Social cognition: From brains to culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fong, K., Mullin, J. B., & Mar, R. A.
(2013) What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 7, 370–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R.
(1993) Experiencing narrative worlds. On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T.
(1991) How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G.
(1991) The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–341). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Green, M. C., Garst, J., & Brock, T. C.
(2004) The power of fiction: Determinants and boundaries. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.) Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 161–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, J.
(2000) The Moral Laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J. F.
(2004) Foregrounding and its effect on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38, 193–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. E., & Bracken, C. C.
(2011) “I really liked that movie”: Testing the relationship between trait empathy, transportation, perceived realism and movie enjoyment. Media Psychology, 23, 90–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N.
(2016) Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 400–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hemingway, E.
(1988) The end of something. In Hemingway, E. In our time (pp. 42–46). London, England: Vintage.Google Scholar
Hsu, C., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M.
(2014) Fiction Feelings in Harry Potter: haemodynamic response in the mid-cingulate cortex correlates with immersive reading experience. Neuroport, 25, 1356–1361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ickes, W.
(Ed.) (1997) Empathic accuracy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Iguarta, J. -J.
(2010) Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films. Communications, 35, 347–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R.
(2012) The unlikely pilgrimage of Harold Fry. London, England: Random House.Google Scholar
Kanske, P., Böckler, A., Trautwein, F., & Singer, T.
(2015) Dissecting the social brain: Introducing the EmpaToM to reveal distinct neural networks and brain-behavior relations for empathy and theory of mind. NeuroImage 122, 6–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keen, S.
(2007) Empathy and the novel. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017a) Different stories: How levels of familiarity with literary and genre-fiction relate to mentalizing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 11, 474–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Panero et al. (2016): Failure to replicate methods caused failure to replicate results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 1–4. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018a) Reading literary fiction can improve theory of mind. Nature Human Behavior, 2, 604, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018b) Reading literary fiction and theory of mind: Three preregistered replications and extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 20, 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. C., Ongis, M., & Castano, E.
(2016) On literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind. Scientific Study of Literature, 6, 42–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. M.
(2015) Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50, 62–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 10, 82–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F.
(2015) Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9, 79–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kumkale, G. T., & Albarracín, D.
(2004) The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 143–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., Støle, H., & Begnum, A. C.
(2017) Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 2, 137–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehne, M., Engel, P., Rohrmeier, M., Menninghaus, M., Jacobs, A. M., & Koelsch, S.
(2015) Reading a suspenseful literary text activates brain areas related to social cognition and predictive inference. PLOS ONE, 10, 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A.
(2018a) Stories and the promotion of social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 257–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018b) Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55, 454–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
(2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J.
(2011) Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during and after reading. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 818–833. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B.
(2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Research in Personality, 40, 694–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B.
(2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34, 407–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W.
(2010) This story is not for everyone: Transportability and narrative persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 361–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J.
(2017) Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 11, 109–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nell, V.
(1988) The psychology of reading for pleasure: Needs and gratifications. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 6–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norman, G.
(2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 625–632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, S.
(2010) A manual for diagnostic analysis of nonverbal accuracy 2. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, Emory University.Google Scholar
Oakley, B. F. M., Brewer, R., Bird, G., & Catmur, C.
(2016) Theory of mind is not theory of emotion: A cautionary note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 818–823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K.
(1999) Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3, 101–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) The cognitive science of fiction. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3, 425–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paal, T., & Bereczkei, T.
(2007) Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 541–551. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
(2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 46–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) No support for the claim that literary fiction uniquely and immediately improves theory of mind: A reply to Kidd and Castano’s commentary on Panero et al. (2016) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 5–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penner, L. A., Fritzsche, B. A., Craiger, J. P., & Freifeld, T. R.
(1995) Measuring the prosocial personality. In J. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10) (pp. 147–163). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T.
(1986) Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pino, M. C., & Mazza, M.
(2016) The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PlOS ONE 11, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richter, D., Dietzel, C., & Kunzmann, U.
(2010) Age differences in emotion recognition: The task matters. The Journals of Gerontology, 66B, 48–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rocklage, M. D., Rucker, D. D., & Nordgren, L. F.
(2018) Persuasion, emotion, and language: The intent to persuade transforms language via emotionality. Psychological Science, 29, 749–760. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L.
(2018) Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013) Cognition and Emotion, 32, 130–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Aharon-Peretz, J.
(2007) Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3054–3067. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, T., & Lamm, C.
(2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slater, M. D.
(2002) Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 157–182). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M., & Zacks, J. M.
(2009) Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science, 20, 989–999. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F.
(1989) Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teding van Berkhout, E., & Malouff, J. M.
(2016) The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Counselling Psychology, 63, 32–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E.
(2004) Source credibility and attitude certainty: A metacognitive analysis of resistance to persuasion. Consumer Psychology, 14, 427–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R., & Felisberti, F. M.
(2017) Measuring mindreading : A review of behavioral approaches to testing cognitive and affective mental state attribution in neurologically typical adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Relationships between fiction media, genre, and empathic abilities. Scientific Study of Literature, 8, 261–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R. & Vallée-Tourangeau, F.
(2020) Narrative engagement and social cognition [Data set]. Open Science Framework. https://​osf​.io​/ca5b9/
van Kujik, I., Verkoeijen, P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A.
(2018) The effect of reading a short passage of literary fiction on theory of mind: A replication of Kidd and Castano (2013). Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 2–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, R., Bölte, S., & Dziobek, I.
(2017) Women know better what other women think and feel: Gender effects on mindreading across the adult life span. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Vuust, P., Dohn, A., Roepstorff, A., & Lund, T. E.
(2011) BOLD response to motion verbs in left posterior middle temporal gyrus during story comprehension. Brain & Language, 119, 221–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walter, H.
(2012) Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: Concepts, circuits and genes. Emotion Review, 4, 9–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zemborain, M. R., & Johar, G. V.
(2007) Attitudinal ambivalence and openness to persuasion: A framework for interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 506–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, L.
(2006) Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar