Article published In:
Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 9:1 (2019) ► pp.3452
References (32)
References
Alexandrov, V. E. (2007). Literature, literariness, and the brain. Comparative Literature, 59(2), 97–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T. & Green, M. (2015). The transportation scale–short form (TS–SF), Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (2018). Imaginary engagement, real-world effects: Fiction, emotion, and social cognition. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 125–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benthian, C. (2012). The Literariness of new media art – a case for expanding the domain of literary studies. Journal of Literary Theory, 61, 311–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carney, J., Wlodarski, R. & Dunbar, R. (2014). Inference or enaction? The impact of genre on the narrative processing of other minds. PLoS ONE, 9(12): e114172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung-Fat-Yim, A., Peterson, J. & Mar, R. (2017). Validating self-paced sentence-by-sentence reading: Story comprehension, recall, and narrative transportation. Read Writ, 301, 857–869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M. (2011). The scientific study of literature: what can, has, and should be done. Scientific Study of Literature, 11, 59–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C. (2013). Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 31, 28–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duchamp, L. (2015). A few thoughts about critics, legitimacy, and comfort. The Cascadia Subduction Zone, 5(2), 1–7.Google Scholar
Emmott, C., Sanford, A. J., & Dawydiak, E. J. (2007). Stylistics meet cognitive science: Studying style in fiction and readers’ attention from an interdisciplinary perspective. Style, 411, 204–224.Google Scholar
Fong, K., Mullin, J., & Mar, R. (2013). What you read matters: the role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavaler, C. (2017). Science fiction makes you stupid, Comments, The Patron Saint of Superheroes, [URL]
Hanauer, D. (1998). Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of formalist, stylistic, and conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 191, 565–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 3421, 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2017). Different stories: How levels of familiarity with literary and genre fiction relate to mentalizing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1141, 474–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Reading literary fiction and theory of mind: Three preregistered replications and extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 522–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. M. (2016). Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 101, 82–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, M., Benesh, N., & Zhang, B. (2008). Computationally discriminating literary from non-literary texts. In S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova, & J. Auracher (Eds.), Directions in empirical literary studies: In honor of Willie van Peer. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. (2009). The neuropsychology of literariness [Abstract]. Conference on Neuroaesthetics, September 24–26, Copenhagen. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from [URL]
(2011). Science in the perspective of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature, 11, 7–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Foregrounding and the sublime: Shelley in Chamonix. Language and Literature, 161, 155–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panero, M. E., Black, J., Barnes, J. L., Weisberg, D. S., Goldstein, T. R., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1111, e46–e54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N. (2017). yarrr: A companion to the e-book “YaRrr!: The Pirate’s Guide to R”. v. 0.1.5. [URL]
Rayner, K., Schotter, E., Masson, M., Potter, M. & Treiman, R. (2016). So much to read, so little time: how do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(1), 4–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. (2007). Foregrounding in poetic discourse: Between deviation and cognitive constraints. Language and Literature, 16(2), 169–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tukachinsky, R. (2014). Experimental manipulation of psychological involvement with media. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
(2007). Introduction to foregrounding: a state of the art. Language and Literature, 161, 99–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, L. A., Hesse, S. J., Petkova, Z., & Trudeau, L. (2009). “This story is right on”: The impact of regulatory fit on narrative engagement and persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(3), 447–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D. H., Zunshine, L., & Holquist, M. (2012). Theory of mind and embedding of perspective: A psychological test of a literary “sweet spot.” Scientific Study of Literature, 21, 301–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kukkonen, Karin & Ylva Østby
2022. Readers during the Covid-19 pandemic. Scientific Study of Literature 12:1-2  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Nicholes, Justin
2020. Science fiction prototyping’s features and impact on college students’ perceptions of writing. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.